Jump to content
HWBOT Community Forums

-> Validated score still wrong? Let us know here


Recommended Posts

Did I post this in the wrong thread???

If so, please let me know the right place??;)

 

I often check new 06 submissions with good scores to learn something from them;)

A good result is almost always good teacher, so if I find a good one I usually check it in detail.

Yesterday, I found a very good 06 result with relatively low cpu/gpu clocks;

http://hwbot.org/community/submission/2120636_cix1978_3dmark06_geforce_gtx_580_43047_marks?tab=info

I got interested how to achieve this and checked it in detail.

FPSs in GT1/2 part are high and I assumed the cpu clock was much higher than 6.15GHz.

CPU Test score is also high and the clock must have been around 6.15GHz.

FPSs in GT3/4 part isn't that high, maybe due to low gpu clock

but the HDR/SM3.0 score seems higher. So I calculated the socore from FPSs with the formula from 06 White Paper;

HDR/SM3.0 Score = 50x(Canyon Flight FPS + Deep Freeze FPS)

 

50x(220.30+168.319)=19417

 

and this is lower than the score in screenshot : 19659.

This formula usually works fine for the calculation but this time ???

There is no ORB link in the result so I cannot check anymore.

Is this 06 bug or something?

Could you check this please?

 

Thanks:)

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • 1 month later...

http://www.hwbot.org/community/submission/2126516_nwd_wprime_32m_athlon_mp_1800_1min_3sec_844ms

Sorry Alex, but your solution here doesn't agree with the rules.

3.4. Unlocked CPUs and Modded Video Cards

Again this is a subject where we have to trust on the honesty of the submitter; if you have a CPU with unlocked multiplier, please only submit results under the hardware category of its original model. Don’t emulate other models to gain HWboints, if you are caught you will get penalized or even banned. The same goes for video cards which are modified either with a flashed BIOS or modded software, post your scores in the category of the original hardware.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Did I post this in the wrong thread???

If so, please let me know the right place??;)

 

Hello gyrock-san! I am not a result mod, but I looked at the result screenshot.... it is not clear.

 

My eyes are not so good, but I think Canyon Flight FPS are 228.850

 

If that is put into the formula, 50(228.850 + 168.319) = 19858.45

 

I think the SM3 score is 19859

 

The problem is the detail in the screenshot, a better resolution would be nice

 

 

 

If the scores are high for the MHz, I do not know :)

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • 3 weeks later...
  • 1 month later...

http://hwbot.org/community/submission/1050800_xandelly_pcmark_2005_core_2_e8600_3.33ghz_23621_marks?tab=more

 

XP startup of 333MB/S, but no option to report.

 

Even if a user does not participate in the rankings, I think the scores should still follow the rules.

 

:)

 

 

 

 

 

Also:

 

http://hwbot.org/community/submission/2148368_cruzen_pcmark_2005_core_2_e8600_3.33ghz_23070_marks?tab=more

 

Validated score, but screenshot isn't for PCM05

Edited by K404
Link to comment
Share on other sites

http://hwbot.org/community/submission/1050800_xandelly_pcmark_2005_core_2_e8600_3.33ghz_23621_marks?tab=more

 

XP startup of 333MB/S, but no option to report.

 

Even if a user does not participate in the rankings, I think the scores should still follow the rules.

 

:)

 

 

 

 

 

Also:

 

http://hwbot.org/community/submission/2148368_cruzen_pcmark_2005_core_2_e8600_3.33ghz_23070_marks?tab=more

 

Validated score, but screenshot isn't for PCM05

 

pwned, I can report them :D

http://hwbot.org/result.history.do?resultId=1050800

 

http://hwbot.org/result.history.do?resultId=2148368

 

:P

Link to comment
Share on other sites

http://hwbot.org/community/submission/933415_aciddman_wprime_32m_2x_athlon_64_3800_x2_manchester_29sec_0ms?tab=info

Listed as 2X 3800 X2's in the single class. Not possible on the listed AM2 motherboard with a 939 CPU. Also, "not participating in HWB ranking" is checked yet was awarded a gold and 1.5 points for a class that doesn't exist. This whole submission stinks and should be blocked.

Also tried to report it in the conventional way, but would not accept the report.:confused:

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • Crew
http://hwbot.org/community/submission/933415_aciddman_wprime_32m_2x_athlon_64_3800_x2_manchester_29sec_0ms?tab=info

Listed as 2X 3800 X2's in the single class. Not possible on the listed AM2 motherboard with a 939 CPU. Also, "not participating in HWB ranking" is checked yet was awarded a gold and 1.5 points for a class that doesn't exist. This whole submission stinks and should be blocked.

Also tried to report it in the conventional way, but would not accept the report.:confused:

 

Fixed Scotty :)

Link to comment
Share on other sites

http://hwbot.org/community/submission/933284_aciddman_pcmark_2005_2x_athlon_64_3800_x2_manchester_6179_marks

Listed as 2X 3800 X2's in the single class. Not possible on the listed AM2 motherboard with a 939 CPU. Also, "not participating in HWB ranking" is checked yet was awarded a gold and 1.5 points for a class that doesn't exist. This whole submission stinks and should be blocked.

Also tried to report it in the conventional way, but would not accept the report.:confused:

 

Same thing as the last one. tia :)

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • Crew
http://hwbot.org/community/submission/933284_aciddman_pcmark_2005_2x_athlon_64_3800_x2_manchester_6179_marks

Listed as 2X 3800 X2's in the single class. Not possible on the listed AM2 motherboard with a 939 CPU. Also, "not participating in HWB ranking" is checked yet was awarded a gold and 1.5 points for a class that doesn't exist. This whole submission stinks and should be blocked.

Also tried to report it in the conventional way, but would not accept the report.:confused:

 

Same thing as the last one. tia :)

 

Fixed, i think... page is too low, or something else :rolleyes:

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Same happens here Danutz, my pi 32 score is 0h 13m 01 343s, and i've tried all formulas to post the correct value, but no sucess, the result go crazy just like 15 days 34 h etc, or i get 13 seconds, i dont know if its a bug or me.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

×
×
  • Create New...