bartx Posted August 21, 2008 Share Posted August 21, 2008 http://hwbot.org/result.do?resultId=750127 http://hwbot.org/result.do?resultId=732603 Scores are blocked, but both were done running default settings - you can't change anything in free version 3DM 2003. In 2001 if you change something, below score is message "Benchmark was not run using default settings" or sth. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
maxine Posted August 22, 2008 Share Posted August 22, 2008 Resolution Not shown (and is a 6800GT in 6800 categ) http://www.hwbot.org/result.do?resultId=643971 Resolution Not shown: http://www.hwbot.org/result.do?resultId=749279 Geforce 6800 ultra in 6800(simple) AGP http://www.hwbot.org/result.do?resultId=758024 Geforce 6800GS PCI Express in AGP categ (abit GD8 havent AGP): http://www.hwbot.org/result.do?resultId=554919 FAKE: Rivatunner have the focus in taskbar but no window rivatuner focus. http://www.hwbot.org/result.do?resultId=686843 Ati X1050 in 9550 categ: http://www.hwbot.org/result.do?resultId=738346 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
knopflerbruce Posted August 22, 2008 Share Posted August 22, 2008 FAKE: Rivatunner have the focus in taskbar but no window rivatuner focus.http://www.hwbot.org/result.do?resultId=686843 http://www.hwbot.org/result.do?resultId=738346 Situations like that happens quite often to me here;) I noticed it once last night. No idea why it happens, but is there any other reason that this may be a fake score? Like a score that doesn't match the HW? Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Just Learnin' Posted August 22, 2008 Share Posted August 22, 2008 Prescott in Northwood category: http://www.hwbot.org/result.do?resultId=694722 user has points in both categories. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
alibabar Posted August 22, 2008 Share Posted August 22, 2008 (edited) Dear moderators, I have some complains about some moderated scores. Can you please check again those one: http://www.hwbot.org/result.do?resultId=551858 (score still in 7600GS DDR2 category instead of 7600GS (DDR3) category!) http://www.hwbot.org/result.do?resultId=546205 (score still in 7600GS DDR2 category instead of 7600GS (DDR3) category!) http://www.hwbot.org/result.do?resultId=764738 (score still in 7600GS DDR2 category instead of 7600GS (DDR3) category!) http://www.hwbot.org/result.do?resultId=546204 (score still in 7600GS DDR2 category instead of 7600GS (DDR3) category!) Added! http://www.hwbot.org/result.do?resultId=760157 (score still in 8600GT DDR2 category instead of 8600GT (DDR3) category!) http://www.hwbot.org/result.do?resultId=760391 (score still in 8600GT DDR2 category instead of 8600GT (DDR3) category!) http://www.hwbot.org/result.do?resultId=760170 (score still in 8600GT DDR2 category instead of 8600GT (DDR3) category!) http://www.hwbot.org/result.do?resultId=760235 (score still in 8600GT DDR2 category instead of 8600GT (DDR3) category!) Many thanks! Edited August 23, 2008 by alibabar added one more Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
The Nemesis Posted August 23, 2008 Share Posted August 23, 2008 I'd like to know what am I missing that causes this result to be blocked. http://www.hwbot.org/compare.do?resultId=758341 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Just Learnin' Posted August 23, 2008 Share Posted August 23, 2008 I'd like to know what am I missing that causes this result to be blocked. http://www.hwbot.org/compare.do?resultId=758341 This is what it says in the entry modifications log: reported by user due to lack of validation (Screenshot is invalid - test results are absent.) insufficient verification for rankings (Please make the screenshot more informative. The result window MUST be on the scrennshot. ) Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
The Nemesis Posted August 24, 2008 Share Posted August 24, 2008 (edited) This is what it says in the entry modifications log: so result details are required? Not just the result score? This is getting irritating. At first the results block because it was covering up what resloution the benchmark was ran in. Now this. Edited August 24, 2008 by The Nemesis Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Just Learnin' Posted August 24, 2008 Share Posted August 24, 2008 so result details are required? Not just the result score? This is getting irritating. At first the results block because it was covering up what resloution the benchmark was ran in. Now this. 3DMark03 submission rules Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
The Nemesis Posted August 24, 2008 Share Posted August 24, 2008 3DMark03 submission rules Thanks for pointing me in the right directions. I ran the benchmark and included futmark link. Guess it's time to purchase '03 since free version only holds 5. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
chris_oktabit Posted August 26, 2008 Share Posted August 26, 2008 (edited) Hello guys, I miss something in my wprime results and i dont know what, so...please help me to correct them. For example this http://www.hwbot.org/result.do?resultId=766180 The problem is at wprime version? or because cpu-z shows 1.000Mhz and no 2.000Mhz? Please let me know to fix it. Thanks! Edit: Ok i find it, the problem is the wprime version. Edited August 26, 2008 by chris_oktabit Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
maxine Posted August 28, 2008 Share Posted August 28, 2008 (edited) Please fix this "Admin validated" results, tnx: Resolution not showed: http://www.hwbot.org/result.do?resultId=643971 6800ultra in 6800(simple) categ: http://www.hwbot.org/result.do?resultId=758024 Edited August 28, 2008 by maxine Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Patrickclouds Posted August 30, 2008 Share Posted August 30, 2008 http://www.hwbot.org/result.do?resultId=758106 the screenshot says 195sek but its uploaded with 2min 14sec (that would be about 134sec) Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
u22 Posted September 1, 2008 Share Posted September 1, 2008 http://www.hwbot.org/result.do?resultId=768158 wprime @ AMD @ 0sec Global RANK 1 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
S_A_V Posted September 3, 2008 Share Posted September 3, 2008 (edited) http://hwbot.org/result.do?resultId=750467 - was checked by moderator http://hwbot.org/result.do?resultId=755636 One bugged score by dejanperkovic (OC-Lab2) with 3870X2+3870 and Maximus Formula posted in both HD3870X2 and HD3870 (3x crossfire) categories.... Maximus Formula have only two PCI-E x16 slots so there is no way to install three HD3870 cards on this mobo. Anyway it has bugged fps in Battle of Proxycon (1417 fps - no way) so both result entries must be removed. Edited September 3, 2008 by S_A_V Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Just Learnin' Posted September 5, 2008 Share Posted September 5, 2008 Prescott in Northwood category, person has points in both categories with this CPU: http://www.hwbot.org/result.do?resultId=694722 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Thor941 Posted September 5, 2008 Share Posted September 5, 2008 Hi All, I have submitted yesterday evening several scores but 2 have not been validated and I don't understand why, it was 1 score in 3DM01 and 1 in Wprime 32Mo Can somebody from the crew tell me? Thx a lot. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
71proste Posted September 9, 2008 Share Posted September 9, 2008 (edited) Pls delete it http://www.hwbot.org/result.do?resultId=768071 reported few times already and nothing Edited September 9, 2008 by 71proste Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
71proste Posted September 9, 2008 Share Posted September 9, 2008 (edited) No I didn't,last time you said one time is enough,so im confuse now I"ll do it,just give me few seconds EDIT: thanks,you're always the best Edited September 9, 2008 by 71proste Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
71proste Posted September 9, 2008 Share Posted September 9, 2008 I was joking I know,me too mate ,heh Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
71proste Posted September 11, 2008 Share Posted September 11, 2008 I was joking http://www.hwbot.org/result.do?resultId=768064 did you removed,r you sure?? Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
71proste Posted September 11, 2008 Share Posted September 11, 2008 I knew it,ok cheers one more time Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
maxine Posted September 12, 2008 Share Posted September 12, 2008 Please fix this "Admin validated" results, tnx: Resolution not showed: http://www.hwbot.org/result.do?resultId=643971 6800ultra in 6800(simple) categ: http://www.hwbot.org/result.do?resultId=758024 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
TASOS Posted September 13, 2008 Share Posted September 13, 2008 http://www.hwbot.org/forum/showpost.php?p=23197&postcount=137 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
knopflerbruce Posted September 13, 2008 Share Posted September 13, 2008 it's not CF, it's a single X1900XTX Crossfire Edition. dont know about the SuperPi score, none was deleted with 22.844 X1900 CF edition has xt clocks @ stock, so it should be in the xt-category, not xtx. FYI. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Join the conversation
You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.