Jump to content
HWBOT Community Forums

HWBot Prime 2016 Tweak


speed.fastest

Recommended Posts

Hello, I want to share HWBot Prime Tweak to the next level performance. So i think will be alot of people re-benching :P

 

Check at my score efficiency with i3 6100 @ 4707MHz : speed.fastest`s HWBOT Prime score: 4893.54 pps with a Core i3 6100

image_id_1598046.jpg

 

The magic is JRE 9 64bit combined with Windows 10 x64 :D

I hope this will easier to who that find HWBot Prime Tweak.

 

Edit: Build 108 seems like not working with HWBot Prime. Try build 107 or 106.

 

Edit 2 : Link added : JRE 9 EA Build 106

https://drive.google.com/file/d/0B2mrL4IrCzQEb3dCTlRmYTgyWlU/view?usp=sharing

 

Edit 3 : Link added : JRE 9 EA Build 107

https://drive.google.com/file/d/0B2mrL4IrCzQEcjZSUTFVTmRmMEU/view?usp=sharing

 

Added guide how to fix broken saving score function for JRE9 118 or above from @Spiedie

tl:dr https://dl.dropboxusercontent.com/u/45025086/hwbot/HWBotPrimeFor9.zip, extract and double click run.cmd

 

get activation.jar out of JAF 1.1 from Java Archive Downloads - Java Platform Technologies

get jaxb .jars from lib folder, downloaded from https://jaxb.java.net/2.2.11/

place jars in same folder (need hwbotprime-0.8.3.jar, activation.jar, jabx-api.jar, jaxb-core.jar, jaxb-impl.jar)

create file run.cmd or run.bat with contents:

start javaw -cp .\* org.hwbot.bench.BootStrap

double click run :)

 

if you still can't save datafiles, replace javaw with java to see the errors

Edited by speed.fastest
  • Thanks 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • Replies 89
  • Created
  • Last Reply

Top Posters In This Topic

  • Administrators

Why buggy? I mean it is different Java, and I tested and results were reproducable within margins after every reboot, frequency scaling was logical and I simply think as much as 9 changed results it might as well have changed the characteristics of rerun orgys. Sure it needs observation, but when software base changes, also characteristics of result optimization can change. Let´s simply watch it, for the start I think all works normal

Link to comment
Share on other sites

This is what you get if you throw every java you can get at every system you can get your hands on. 5 runs per java version, 80+ different java versions. Ill let everyone else test skylake :P

 

Min 3583.77, max 3591.22, diff 7.45, ratio 0.21%, best jre8u31 i5-2400S

Min 3602.00, max 3608.58, diff 6.58, ratio 0.18%, best jre7u51 i7-2630QM

Min 7458.67, max 7499.40, diff 40.73, ratio 0.55%, best jre7u15 2xE5-2670

Min 4589.02, max 5390.52, diff 801.50, ratio 17.47%, best jre9u83 i5-3570k 4Ghz

Min 4919.96, max 4958.63, diff 38.67, ratio 0.79%, best jre7u76 i7-4712MQ

Min 1555.62, max 1592.32, diff 36.70, ratio 2.36%, best jre6u3 D925

Min 3989.60, max 4384.42, diff 394.82, ratio 9.90%, best jre6u20 G3258 4.7Ghz

Min 1639.32, max 1643.54, diff 4.22, ratio 0.26%, best jre8u51 G470

Min 1666.20, max 1698.01, diff 31.81, ratio 1.91%, best jre7u71 Atom Z3740D

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • Crew
test g3258

version : 8.0.110.12

os : win7 64

4,7ghz 4228.16

 

test g3258

version : 9.0.0.53

os : win7 64

4,7ghz 4337

 

test g3258

version : 9.0.x.x

os : win7 64

4,7ghz 4429

 

How many runs is this ? I tried 10 consecutieve runs on a 2600K, 3770K, 4770K & 5960x and didn't get any significant boost with the new 9 106-107 Java version versus my preferred ones ( version depending on the CPUs )... usually the new 9 version was even slower lol...

 

We are looking for a whopping boost of +400/500points as with Skylake...

Edited by Leeghoofd
Link to comment
Share on other sites

So Spiedie's best efficiency is with jre6u20 (Win7?)

Min 3989.60, max 4384.42, diff 394.82, ratio 9.90%, best jre6u20 G3258 4.7Ghz

 

And Raules had better luck with version : 9.0.x.x on W7 64

test g3258

version : 9.0.x.x

os : win7 64

4,7ghz 4429

 

I guess it's time to do some testing and see what I get

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.


×
×
  • Create New...