Crew Leeghoofd Posted July 11, 2016 Crew Posted July 11, 2016 Very good efficiency Tobias, well done Quote
Guest Sinebrychof Posted July 11, 2016 Posted July 11, 2016 (edited) Almost too good to be true. Edited July 11, 2016 by Sinebrychof Quote
TaPaKaH Posted July 11, 2016 Posted July 11, 2016 Why? This score's efficiency is 2.249 pts/GHz, which is worse than 2.254 pts/GHz and 2.267 pts/GHz once achieved by dhenzjhen. Quote
Recommended Posts
Join the conversation
You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.