Jump to content
HWBOT Community Forums
liq_met

Correct it

Recommended Posts

On 5/6/2018 at 3:57 PM, TheRedBaron said:

Seems to be a special OEM part. I know that this stuff is created from Gigabyte but if identifies itself as Lenovo, I just have it their way.

  • Thanks 1

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
On 24 Май 2018 г. at 10:17 PM, Strunkenbold said:

fixed

Nforce500 is a rebrand from NF4, so it is correct.

Ok. What w/ http://hwbot.org/hardware/processor/core_2_duo_e6540/ exatly there is e6540? You do a wipeout http://hwbot.org/hardware/motherboard/k9n_ultra_(ms-7250_v2.0)/ ?

Сould you add this picture https://cloud.mail.ru/public/5kQC/fF4BBBPKm in http://hwbot.org/submission/3277266 ? Not "edit" option.

Yet there: http://hwbot.org/search/submissions/permalink?username=lelik9&mbModelId=209&mbManufacturerId=207

Edited by Liq-met

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
On 5/14/2018 at 8:40 PM, Mr.Scott said:

http://hwbot.org/hardware/processor/phenom_ii_x4_970t/

No such thing as a 970T.

It is a 970 BE  rev. E0  Zosma core.

The only sub in your 970T class is a 970 BE unlocked to 6 cores.

Needs to be moved and the 970T classification removed.

 

On 5/15/2018 at 8:26 AM, yosarianilives said:

If the 970 be was capable of being unlocked to 6 cores then it should be called 970t. The normal 970 be was based on deneb. All thuban based cpus have a "t" after the number. Although for some reason the thuban based one is also called 970 be, even though by AMD's naming standards it would be called 970t. I think that it's still a good idea to call it 970t to distinguish it or else perhaps name it "970 be (zosma)" and add deneb for the normal cpu, as it is a different cpu than the deneb version.

Mr. Scott is right that this CPU is not a "970T" - it is "Thuban" based ("Zosma") without the "T" and that should be how it is named. We confuse this because the rest of that 4 core "Zosma" lineup also had a "T". The "T" however does not mean "T" for "Thuban", this is a misunderstanding. The "T" is for Turbo. "Thuban" had the first implementation of AMD Turbo Core which is why that was appended to the end of the model names.

The "Zosma" 970 Black Edition does not feature Turbo Core, hence the absence of the "T". Regardless of the fact that it matches the clockspeed of the "Deneb" 970 Black Edition, L3 cache latency / IMC performance is different (~1866 MHz DDR3 limit of "Deneb"/"Propus"/"Regor" removed, and a minor IPC loss due to L3 cache configuration) and still differentiates it enough that it deserves its own page.

On 5/15/2018 at 6:20 PM, Mr.Scott said:

The proper class is 970 BE Zosma.

Thuban has nothing to do with it.

HWB uses CPU World for reference for every other CPU. There is no reason not to use it for this one.

 

http://www.cpu-world.com/CPUs/K10/AMD-Phenom II X4 970 Black Edition - HDZ970FBK4DGR.html

Well, "Thuban" does have something to do with the CPU existing, but not in the way that the "T" stands for "Thuban"

On 5/16/2018 at 8:17 AM, yosarianilives said:

Zosma is the Thuban die. That's like saying that Heka and Propus aren't just Deneb with cache or cores disabled. Or that Sargas isn't just Regor with a core disabled. But I get what you're talking about with AMD's codenames for the soft disabled versions of each of their dies.

Just some fun facts....
"Zosma" is always the "Thuban" die.
"Heka" is always "Deneb".
"Propus" is actually its own die, with no L3, or the HyperTransport PHYs that "Deneb" / "Shanghai" include, though some "Propus" CPUs are "Deneb" inside.
"Regor" is also its own die, though some "Regor" CPUs are "Propus" / "Deneb" inside.
"Sargas" is always "Regor" inside.

Some "Propus" chips are "Deneb" with disabled L3, however, this is easily differentiated physically by the 5-letter stepping code on the IHS :
AACYC / CACAC / CACDC / CACYC AC ... **C** = Deneb,
AADIC / AADHC / CADIC / CADHC / NADHC / NADIC ... **D** = Propus.

Regardless of what die the supposed "Propus" CPU is in reality, CPUID and stepping (BL-C2 / BL-C3) will identify as "Propus", though performance is the same and they always share the same errata as their "Deneb" counterparts (RB-C2 / RB-C3).

"Regor" is the same way, some "Regor" (DA-C2 / DA-C3) are actually 2-core dies physically while others are full "Propus" or full "Deneb" physically. Again, the actual "Regor" die shares the same errata and performance as "Propus" and "Deneb". 

CACAC /  CACEC ... etc. = Deneb, 
NADIC ... etc. = Propus, 
NAEGC / NAEKC = Regor

TL;DR
Basically, 3rd letter of 5 letter stepping code = C, the die is Deneb. D = Propus, E = Regor. This goes for the whole 45nm Athlon II / Phenom II lineup regardless of SKU.

On 5/24/2018 at 2:14 PM, Strunkenbold said:

Yes, there is no 970T on CPUWorld. But we create separate categories for different cores. So there would be still two 970 categories. One Deneb, one Zosma.

As it is such a rare piece of hardware and Im not sure that CPUworld has the correct informations, I just leave it as 970T like CPU-Z identified it.

Well, the "T" is still wrong. This chip doesn't have Turbo Core.
You guys should fix it, and it can keep its own page.
The CPU-Z identification is incorrect, as shown in the actual specification line: "AMD Phenom II X4 970 Processor"
https://valid.x86.fr/show_oc.php?id=1913942


I studied AMD a bit much in 2008-2012. The last era where AMD didn't give a **** about wafer mask costs because their yields at 45nm were actually half decent.

Cheers,
Sam

Edited by BeepBeep2
  • Like 1
  • Thanks 2

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
13 hours ago, BeepBeep2 said:

Well, the "T" is still wrong. This chip doesn't have Turbo Core.
You guys should fix it, and it can keep its own page.
The CPU-Z identification is incorrect, as shown in the actual specification line: "AMD Phenom II X4 970 Processor"
https://valid.x86.fr/show_oc.php?id=1913942

Okay point taken.

Corrected the core to Zosma and renamed the category to Phenom II X4 970 BE (Zosma). Also renamed the Deneb category to Phenom II X4 970 BE (Deneb), to not confuse the people.

As we have now two ugly categories more in the db I hope everyone is happy now.

  • Thanks 1

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
1 hour ago, Strunkenbold said:

 

Corrected the core to Zosma and renamed the category to Phenom II X4 970 BE (Zosma). Also renamed the Deneb category to Phenom II X4 970 BE (Deneb), to not confuse the people.

As we have now two ugly categories more in the db I hope everyone is happy now.

Thank you.........and I'm sorry.

  • Haha 1

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
On 6/1/2018 at 1:50 AM, Strunkenbold said:

 

Thank you and I'm think on it worth a look at: shared 4 MB. Looks like E6500k . Accuracy to accuracy.

Do an outwipe http://hwbot.org/hardware/motherboard/122_ck_nf66_t1/ , there are errors in other benchmarks, e.g., cpu freq-y and Memory Freq.

Don`t done:

https://hwbot.org/submission/674208  nForce 680i sli

Where write to corect it? There is chipset should be removed on nForce 630a:

http://hwbot.org/submission/967542 http://hwbot.org/submission/2178270

https://hwbot.org/search/submissions/permalink?username=Vservera&gpuId=1371 odd cart

https://hwbot.org/submission/2189046 odd see query

https://hwbot.org/submission/2170225_schwarzer_kaiser_3dmark2001_se_unichrome_pro_1995_marks P5V-VM DH

Radeon HD 3100:

https://hwbot.org/submission/844764 https://hwbot.org/submission/844766 or bug of gpuz

Radeon HD 3000:

http://hwbot.org/search/submissions/permalink?username=strannik20&gpuId=1541

hd_3000, because http://www.gigabyte.ru/products/page/mb/ga-78lmt-usb3rev_41#kf

https://hwbot.org/submission/2641964_noms_3dmark03_radeon_hd_3200_7433_marks

https://hwbot.org/search/submissions/permalink?username=Ghouli&gpuId=450 X800 xt

GMA 4500MHD (GM45:

https://hwbot.org/search/submissions/permalink?username=SEndero Luminoso&gpuId=1401

https://hwbot.org/search/submissions/permalink?username=liteon&gpuId=1401

recalculate:

https://hwbot.org/submission/3597504_dark_knight_3dmark03_gma_x4500_(g43_g41)_1842_marks/
https://hwbot.org/submission/3597503_dark_knight_3dmark2001_se_gma_x4500_(g43_g41)_4369_marks/

https://hwbot.org/submission/2100132 Mobility Radeon 9000 (64bit)? and further

https://hwbot.org/submission/1067143

https://hwbot.org/submission/562336

https://hwbot.org/submission/2343597

https://hwbot.org/submission/2668860 CKD-VISUM 

https://hwbot.org/submission/2575976

https://hwbot.org/submission/2298001

Delete:

https://hwbot.org/submission/1022709_maduk_reference_frequency_ga_965p_s3_475_mhz delete quote on GA-7VA

https://hwbot.org/submission/1019834_zsolt_93_3dmark06_geforce_9500_gt_gddr3_128_bit_7041_marks/

https://hwbot.org/submission/2919526 https://hwbot.org/submission/2919530 without tabs lokki

https://hwbot.org/search/submissions/permalink?username=Joa3d43&gpuId=1401video benchmarks  without tabs

https://hwbot.org/submission/2260318 https://hwbot.org/submission/2301177 *kenny*

https://hwbot.org/submission/1043383_hamedy12_3dmark2001_se_gma_4500mhd_(gm45_gs45)_4513_marks
https://hwbot.org/submission/582585_h3x0r_3dmark03_geforce_7900_gs_19_marks/

https://hwbot.org/submission/3413318_ostseebengel72_gpupi___1b_geforce_gtx_1080_17sec_295ms/

https://hwbot.org/submission/2283261_dejo_3dmark2001_se_hd_graphics_3000_39489_marks/  ??

https://hwbot.org/submission/2452679_joa3d43_3dmark2001_se_gma_x4500_(g43_g41)_6952_marks

Edited by Liq-met
Addition

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
Posted (edited)

https://hwbot.org/submission/640781 Pentium 4 'D' 945

https://hwbot.org/submission/2391579_zombie568_reference_frequency_p8h61_m_lx_99.77_mhz/ -M LX2

Take back all subs w/ https://hwbot.org/submission/787685 > https://hwbot.org/search/submissions/permalink?userId=9429&gpuId=1264 , there is bug of gpuz. True here https://hwbot.org/submission/

https://hwbot.org/search/submissions/permalink?username=ivan_ua&gpuId=1264 Here need write data of bug, all case version of gpuz 1.5 .

https://hwbot.org/search/submissions/permalink?username=JIeIIIKa63&gpuId=1291  1024

https://hwbot.org/search/submissions/permalink?username=SerpentXSF&gpuId=1818 GMA X4500 (G43, G41)

https://hwbot.org/search/submissions/permalink?username=Coolbits&gpuId=1489 all w/ 7600 GS DDR2, bug of gpuz

https://hwbot.org/search/submissions/permalink?username=mortowkx&gpuId=1772&gpuBatchId=1247 HD Graphics (Sandy Bridge)

https://hwbot.org/search/submissions/permalink?username=Warrior_oF_Byte&gpuId=1311 Quadro NVS 210S on case to was 2 solution for Am2

d915gav/:
https://hwbot.org/submission/781530_joker_pcmark05_athlon_xp_3000_(barton)_3358_marks

https://hwbot.org/search/submissions/permalink?username=delly&mbModelId=2464&mbManufacturerId=120

https://hwbot.org/search/submissions/permalink?username=dasrega&gpuId=884GeForce 7900 GS AGP

https://hwbot.org/search/submissions/permalink?username=sparkey247&cpuId=334 (Northwood, HT) 

D201GLY :

https://hwbot.org/submission/816593 https://hwbot.org/submission/816594 https://hwbot.org/submission/816595 https://hwbot.org/submission/816597

Allow sub w/ date older 2012 age? https://hwbot.org/submission/2469046_leegit_3dmark05_gma_x4500hd_(g45)_1746_marks/

https://hwbot.org/submission/2522315 why Mobile?

https://hwbot.org/submission/2433989 GeForce 9600 GSO GDDR2 (G92, 192bit) https://hwbot.org/submission/2167210  https://hwbot.org/submission/2387620 GeForce 9600 GSO GDDR2 (G92, 192bit) new carts?

https://hwbot.org/submission/915215 https://hwbot.org/submission/915225 https://hwbot.org/submission/915227

https://hwbot.org/submission/2483424 also is MSM7225A 600MHz

https://hwbot.org/submission/2912068 see query

Why dont have this  result https://hwbot.org/submission/4169935 in https://hwbot.org/benchmark/testcpu/rankings

Which difference between https://hwbot.org/submission/3622996 and  https://hwbot.org/submission/2889077 if  they have device id  181? The true geforce4_mx_440 should have 171 https://hwbot.org/submission/3472226

Edited by Liq-met
hello Strunkenbold

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Strunkenbold decided to get some rest, now I'm running database back again.

 

Fixed you requests.

  • Haha 1

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.


×
×
  • Create New...