chew* Posted March 23, 2017 Share Posted March 23, 2017 (edited) timings? Cause single 12-12-12 win over dual 18-16-16... Apples to apples 12-12-12 2933 is less than 3 seconds ahead of 16-14-14 2933. Timings are worth something...but not a whole lot. Cas latency is worth the most. Edited March 23, 2017 by chew* Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
chew* Posted March 24, 2017 Share Posted March 24, 2017 Infrareds No cmos battery tweak. Massmans not genuine windows activation pop up tweak Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Massman Posted March 25, 2017 Author Share Posted March 25, 2017 Looking good! But you really need get a board with clockgen haha Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
chew* Posted March 25, 2017 Share Posted March 25, 2017 Looking good! But you really need get a board with clockgen haha Where courage, motivation and ignorance meet, a persistent idiot awakens Working on it but me handicapped I think is fair for now Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
chew* Posted March 27, 2017 Share Posted March 27, 2017 Progress with 32G dual rank on a non ref clock board. 3200mhz booted and validated Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Alex@ro Posted March 27, 2017 Share Posted March 27, 2017 beta bios with new agesa? Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
chew* Posted March 27, 2017 Share Posted March 27, 2017 beta bios with new agesa? No sir. Just a persistant brilliant idiot. 0511 bios on prime x370 Bios says microcode is same as 0504. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
filmbot Posted March 28, 2017 Share Posted March 28, 2017 Ok Here goes timings versus fabric single rank and dual rank. Single rank 2933 IMG Single rank 3200 IMG Dual Rank 2666 IMG Dual rank 2933 IMG Conclusion Single rank speed + fabric wins ( we pretty much knew this ) Dual rank Application specific tossup. cheers What are you meaning by "fabric"? Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Johan45 Posted March 30, 2017 Share Posted March 30, 2017 Looks like a lot of the results in the OP are being run with Win10 which is obviously bugged and not allowed Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
chew* Posted April 2, 2017 Share Posted April 2, 2017 (edited) Ok been working my ASuS off on this. Finally found some efficiency. Now if only I could find better memory O_o Your turn chispy Edited April 2, 2017 by chew* 1 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
zeneffect Posted April 2, 2017 Share Posted April 2, 2017 Ok been working my ASuS off on this. Finally found some efficiency. Now if only I could find better memory O_o Your turn chispy welcome back Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
chispy Posted April 3, 2017 Share Posted April 3, 2017 Ok been working my ASuS off on this. Finally found some efficiency. Now if only I could find better memory O_o Your turn chispy I will give it my best this week my good old friend Chew , i am having a nightmare and a very hard time trying to install windows xp and i think it's not possible so i will do it on windows 7 like everyone else. Nice efficiency you got there Chew :celebration: well done ! Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
chew* Posted April 3, 2017 Share Posted April 3, 2017 Xp is in the works. For now we have found some effeciency in 7 though. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
I.nfraR.ed Posted April 3, 2017 Share Posted April 3, 2017 Can we all test at 4GHz or 5GHz, please. There's more to be optimized. I've tried Win7 x86, but it appears to be slower for me, but might try a diff version later. Just for a start Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
chispy Posted April 3, 2017 Share Posted April 3, 2017 Can we all test at 4GHz or 5GHz, please. There's more to be optimized. I've tried Win7 x86, but it appears to be slower for me, but might try a diff version later. Just for a start Sure will do I.nfraR.ed 4Ghz it is :celebration: Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
chew* Posted April 3, 2017 Share Posted April 3, 2017 (edited) not fast or effecient but since memory is a huge factor........... Dual rank pc3400 cas is set 17 in bios. Looks like things are getting better Edited April 5, 2017 by chew* Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
rivaldokfc Posted April 7, 2017 Share Posted April 7, 2017 not fast or effecient but since memory is a huge factor........... Dual rank pc3400 cas is set 17 in bios. Looks like things are getting better how about the 1.94A beta bios? Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
chew* Posted April 7, 2017 Share Posted April 7, 2017 how about the 1.94A beta bios? Recently swapped....even better. Collecting results atm.... 3200 14-14-14 running prime stable....preety impressive for pc3400 16-16-16 bin....i would expect 15-15-15 3200@ best for that bin normally... Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
chew* Posted April 8, 2017 Share Posted April 8, 2017 Here you go.....taichi 1.94a 2x 16g Dual Rank PC 3200 @ 14-14-14-34 Ok so its bench stable big deal right? How about pretty damn brutal 13+ hours stress test stable? Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
zeneffect Posted April 10, 2017 Share Posted April 10, 2017 zeneffect`s SuperPi - 32M score: 8min 26sec 189ms with a Ryzen 7 1700X Dang just a few MHz off, I got something else though if you want me to sub it Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
zeneffect Posted April 17, 2017 Share Posted April 17, 2017 (edited) subbed, your turn. 8:19s are definitely doable @ 4ghz edit: 8:18s Edited April 18, 2017 by zeneffect 1 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
zeneffect Posted April 19, 2017 Share Posted April 19, 2017 (edited) I guess Windows 10 subs in 32m will always be an uphill battle. Oddly enough, Windows 7 when done right is actually faster. Edited April 19, 2017 by zeneffect Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
chew* Posted April 25, 2017 Share Posted April 25, 2017 It beats Monkey but sux monkey ballz... Definitely not efficient for 4.6 but efficient enough for 2800... Imc coldbug is sooooooo fun... Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
flanker Posted April 25, 2017 Share Posted April 25, 2017 did you tried with wazza or not? I will to know this weekend in practice, what is IMC coldbug Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
chew* Posted April 26, 2017 Share Posted April 26, 2017 If you notice I pulled 3 secs off time with considerably less memory speed without software tweaking Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Join the conversation
You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.