l0ud_sil3nc3 Posted November 27, 2020 Share Posted November 27, 2020 (edited) Also tried another cpu, but super low cb as well: Edited November 27, 2020 by l0ud_sil3nc3 1 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
George_o/c Posted November 27, 2020 Share Posted November 27, 2020 Holy balls these numbers are faaast! 2032 IF 1:1 32GB CL14 daaaamn It's a pitty that CPU has coldbug so high Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
chew* Posted November 27, 2020 Share Posted November 27, 2020 (edited) yep davis was a tad faster than this on the giga which was faster back then. This was one of the fastest 4 gig results back then. looks like 5000 series does it easily. Now ill have to break it down see if cpu model impacts results or we don't need the highest cache cpu to play the game. I imagine at your experience level you tested 2x8 also loud so coldbug was bad regardless i gather? Edited November 27, 2020 by chew* Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
I.nfraR.ed Posted November 27, 2020 Share Posted November 27, 2020 (edited) 10 hours ago, l0ud_sil3nc3 said: Here's a few 4Ghz runs for comparison 2100 IF vs 2033 IF both 1:1 Also tried this cpu out on cold but -120c cb really kills the clocks Wait, 2033 is much faster than 2100? Is that the slow down some people talk about? I guess you don't want to disclose your timings, but if you run latest beta of ZenTimings, could you spot some differences in non user-configurable timings? I don't have 5000 series to check myself. Is it strap related? For example, is it the same if you use the lower strap and clock the bclk up or is it just some internal strap that makes things waaay slacker? Edited November 27, 2020 by I.nfraR.ed Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
flanker Posted November 28, 2020 Share Posted November 28, 2020 I think 1800MHz low timings could be still better than FCLK 2000 MHz for SUperpi (with current AGESA). Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
flanker Posted November 28, 2020 Share Posted November 28, 2020 15 hours ago, I.nfraR.ed said: Wait, 2033 is much faster than 2100? Is that the slow down some people talk about? I guess you don't want to disclose your timings, but if you run latest beta of ZenTimings, could you spot some differences in non user-configurable timings? I don't have 5000 series to check myself. Is it strap related? For example, is it the same if you use the lower strap and clock the bclk up or is it just some internal strap that makes things waaay slacker? I think this is reason of current agesa, but. Still I think 1800 MHz FCLOCK cpould be a little quicker than 2033 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
shar00750 Posted November 28, 2020 Share Posted November 28, 2020 (edited) Got score under 5 minuts . 5600x at 6050mhz 4:54.300 @flanker Edited November 28, 2020 by shar00750 6 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
flanker Posted November 28, 2020 Share Posted November 28, 2020 this is briliant! New AMD record in Superpi 32M! 1 2 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Max-Hardware_Numb3rs Posted November 28, 2020 Share Posted November 28, 2020 1 hour ago, shar00750 said: Got score under 5 minuts . 5600x at 6050mhz 4:54.300 @flanker Well done! And thanks, now I know what to do next session 1 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
l0ud_sil3nc3 Posted November 29, 2020 Share Posted November 29, 2020 On 11/27/2020 at 12:02 PM, chew* said: yep davis was a tad faster than this on the giga which was faster back then. This was one of the fastest 4 gig results back then. looks like 5000 series does it easily. Now ill have to break it down see if cpu model impacts results or we don't need the highest cache cpu to play the game. I imagine at your experience level you tested 2x8 also loud so coldbug was bad regardless i gather? Hey @chew* haven't had a chance to actually test 2x8GB yet, but it's on the chopping block tonight I only have a 5950x so I can't comment on the lower core count cpu's but I imagine having more cache can only be a good thing just like Zen 2. CB is shit on the two samples I tried at any fclk. On 11/27/2020 at 1:11 PM, I.nfraR.ed said: Wait, 2033 is much faster than 2100? Is that the slow down some people talk about? I guess you don't want to disclose your timings, but if you run latest beta of ZenTimings, could you spot some differences in non user-configurable timings? I don't have 5000 series to check myself. Is it strap related? For example, is it the same if you use the lower strap and clock the bclk up or is it just some internal strap that makes things waaay slacker? @I.nfraR.ed it seems like it's way slower at both 4/5Ghz on this end. I can even train 2133/4266 but not stable. I'm not sure I know about this slow down, but simply running pi 1M you can see the difference, as well as checking with aida64 as all memory operations are slower at 2100 IF vs 2033 IF. Will try the latest beta of ZT and compare, the copy I had wouldn't open so I'm glad to see you it's been updated for Vermeer. As for bclk the Aqua doesn't seem to like bclk, or could simply be user error I don't know if it's memory divider but even 1900/3800 seems super fast as well. 2 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
chew* Posted November 30, 2020 Share Posted November 30, 2020 (edited) probably error correction feature in cpu causing slowdown. bclk on asrock x370 was limted to like 110 previously have to kill all devices no nvme best to physically unplug the bluetooth/wifi from board as it knocks it out will probably break it. pci e gen 1 etc etc all the AMD bclk tricks will be needed for it to maybe work. Edited November 30, 2020 by chew* 2 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
I.nfraR.ed Posted December 4, 2020 Share Posted December 4, 2020 (edited) First tries with 5600X, currently on Win 10. Not bad for this board, I think. I can't boot XP anymore with this gen and bios. Edited December 4, 2020 by I.nfraR.ed 2 1 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
SparkysAdventure Posted December 4, 2020 Share Posted December 4, 2020 @l0ud_sil3nc3What did your CB reject 5950Xs do ambient? Also, were they retail? Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
flanker Posted December 8, 2020 Share Posted December 8, 2020 Today are two good Superpi32M results by AMD. First 32M (for short time AMD WR) 4m 51.494s by @gnasherrr https://hwbot.org/submission/4622720_gnasherrr_superpi___32m_ryzen_9_5950x_4min_51sec_494ms Later today @safedisk did current AMD WR in 32M 4m 45.918s on Ryzen 9 5900X https://hwbot.org/submission/4622833_safedisk_superpi___32m_ryzen_9_5900x_4min_45sec_918ms 2 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
George_o/c Posted December 9, 2020 Share Posted December 9, 2020 wow almost 6200mhz 32m by safedisk! ? Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
l0ud_sil3nc3 Posted December 10, 2020 Share Posted December 10, 2020 On 12/4/2020 at 9:02 PM, Sparky's__Adventure said: @l0ud_sil3nc3What did your CB reject 5950Xs do ambient? Also, were they retail? 4800+ on air, yes they are retail. 2 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
I.nfraR.ed Posted December 10, 2020 Share Posted December 10, 2020 (edited) I've tried all the tweaks from the old Bulldozer Conditioner (yes, I've disassembled it some time ago and know exactly what it does), also some of my own test tweaks I was working on for the previous zen generations. If anything, one of the registers makes it extremely slow and the whole system gets laggy. Most of the registers are undocumented, the BKDG for 15h has more information than the document for 17h, but there's probably no parity between all the features and a specific bit in a register on 15h might be something else on 17h. Also Zen doesn't support Trailing Bit Manipulation (TBM) instruction set or at least the matching bit is marked as "Reserved" and that's one of the significant tweaks from BDC. Others don't really improve the performance in SuperPi. They had some positive effect on Gen1 last time I tried, but it seems all performance bias tweaks aren't applicable on Vermeer, perhaps nothing significant to tweak anymore with this gen. My modded XP is still working with Vermeer, but is slower than untuned Windows 10. Wazza doesn't help either, so I guess it is game over for XP. I've noticed it was slow with 3000G. It was fine with first gen though, perhaps with Zen+, too. Back on Windows 10 now. PS: Untweaked Windows 7 is also slower for me. PS2: At least now I know which register kills the performance completely and will try to tune the old perf bias options. Edited December 10, 2020 by I.nfraR.ed Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
flanker Posted December 10, 2020 Share Posted December 10, 2020 What I remember on Zen or Zen+, on my side worked second Superpi 32M run. Tahts mean after first one I got any results and after I do not closed Superpi, but running 32M again and ussually I got better socre by 2-4s Not tested it on Zen2 or Zen3 yet. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
I.nfraR.ed Posted December 10, 2020 Share Posted December 10, 2020 Yes, that's because of the hw prefetchers, but on XP and Zen3 haven't experienced the same. Granted my bios lacks those options. Most of the times 3rd run is very slow already and have to restart the system. 1 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
flanker Posted December 10, 2020 Share Posted December 10, 2020 @Dancop Dancops 5GHz run and propably current 5GHz WR ever https://www.facebook.com/HWBOT.Dancop/posts/2404525896360301 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Dancop Posted December 11, 2020 Share Posted December 11, 2020 Yes, thanks Michal, that's what I did and hopefully many will play now. I think with the right os and tweaks, we might see 5.39ish 1 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Crew Leeghoofd Posted December 11, 2020 Crew Share Posted December 11, 2020 Still beats me why people only post on facebook... don't get it 1 1 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Dancop Posted December 11, 2020 Share Posted December 11, 2020 I'm sorry mister hwbot! Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Crew Leeghoofd Posted December 11, 2020 Crew Share Posted December 11, 2020 opened a compo for this: Superpi32 LLC is easier to monitor, compare,... locked at max 5006Mhz. 2 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Dancop Posted December 11, 2020 Share Posted December 11, 2020 Please guys... Would be great to sub only with timings visible. It's all about playing with the os Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Join the conversation
You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.