Amd_ocer Posted April 27, 2017 Share Posted April 27, 2017 You worry too much, auto works fine so does LLC 3 you just need to set V_Core to accommodate your needs. Auto will have a larger droop under load. I never had issue with that until I pushed harder and the droop started to increase. Then I raised it to LLC 3 which kept load voltage ~ .025V lower than BIOS setting under load. I am actually not worried about vdroop: at worst your stress test will fail, at best you save your CPU. I am worried about LLC allowing the CPU to go much higher than the idle set limit in BIOS when CPU is under load. At best it should keep it within that limit, not go OVER it... What MB manuf should do is have 2 vcore voltages: one for idle, and another for load, so CPU will bounce between these two values depending on load. LLC can cause dangerous results especially that we dont know exactly what is the voltage limit for each LLC level, Auto included... It does not help when majority of software are not measuring correctly, so what you see is not what you get Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
I.nfraR.ed Posted April 27, 2017 Share Posted April 27, 2017 Common, even at LLC5 it is going slightly above what set in bios. It's not like going to 1.8V when 1.4V is set. I don't see what danger you're talking about. Also, what voltage limit on each LLC? You can measure it under socket for actual voltage. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Amd_ocer Posted April 27, 2017 Share Posted April 27, 2017 Common, even at LLC5 it is going slightly above what set in bios. It's not like going to 1.8V when 1.4V is set.I don't see what danger you're talking about. Also, what voltage limit on each LLC? You can measure it under socket for actual voltage. That depends greatly on each MB, I have seen ugly voltage overshooting with LLC being used under load on many boards. Maybe not the Crosshair, I cannot confirm until I get one. I will try to find the measurement points for the DMM once I get CPU / MB... Does Asus even mention what is the voltage variance between each LLC level used? Meaning if it is set at 1.40 in BIOS, what is the range of voltage it would vary between each LLC level used? Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
ReDXfiRe Posted April 27, 2017 Share Posted April 27, 2017 With new BIOS 0079 even with LLC 4; it doesn't go higher than what you specify in Vcore so there's no danger. In older BIOS with LLC 5 you would see higher than specified in Vcore. I have it running on LLC 4 at 1.42 volts and it never surpasses 1.42. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
chew* Posted April 28, 2017 Share Posted April 28, 2017 (edited) Llc 1002 bios Bios set 1.4v LLC 5 optimized phase control....not extreme ( are you on ln2? No...then do not use extreme) Load @ measure pad 1.44-1.45 Load @ socket 1.40-1.41 idle 1.39. Speculation without even owning this particular board? Priceless. Using software to monitor voltage? Silly. Edited April 28, 2017 by chew* Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Amd_ocer Posted April 28, 2017 Share Posted April 28, 2017 (edited) Well maybe Asus should clarify their voltage expected range with each of their LLC levels, so we dont have to do all this guessing and manual checking work? Ya they should, and that is the root problem, not me trying to get the info I need... Speculation based on lack of info from manuf is Normal. Measuring at socket with a dmm should not be a requirement for 95% of users, unless you are doing hardcore OCing or require some crazy accuracy, which is again, not the case for 95% of users. Otherwise, it is AMD and the motherboard manuf that should tell software engineers how to accurately find and display all these necessary voltages. It is not rocket science, nor should it be the way it is today. You are lucky you are not dealing with hundreds of amps and hundreds of volts otherwise you would be thinking very hard b4 suggesting to use a dmm. Just saying... Ya let me open my case and measure with a dmm every time I need a vcore or SOC reading... far from practical or ideal.. Assuming nothing get shorted....thats what I call silly I been using dmm for over 10 years, for all kind of applications, but this is NOT where I wanna use a dmm while OCing or getting some simple voltages on a $300+ board and a $400+ CPU.. Edited April 28, 2017 by Amd_ocer Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
gupsterg Posted April 29, 2017 Share Posted April 29, 2017 (edited) The Stilt posted this info on OCN regarding LLC on C6H, this one is also good information. Then Raja@Asus also did some oscilloscope tests, see this post, then in this post he states the same thing as The Stilt on "voltage point". Then a member did some testing of ProbeIt point vs Socket using DMM (which will not show under/overshoot like oscilloscope). The conclusion was drawn that CPU Core Voltage (SVI2 TFN) in HWiNFO is ~ what CPU get, but again as SW and slow read, accuracy is a factor IMO. So I use as "ballpark". Edited April 29, 2017 by gupsterg Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
dsquitieri1 Posted April 29, 2017 Share Posted April 29, 2017 Anyone using new 1106 bios yet? If so is it any better? Sent from my SM-N920V using Tapatalk Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
gupsterg Posted April 29, 2017 Share Posted April 29, 2017 1106 did not allow voltage change for several of us on OCN. The UEFI is supposed be removed from Asus site but delay AFAIK. 1107 is working AOK so far for several of us, in this post by Elmor. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
dsquitieri1 Posted April 29, 2017 Share Posted April 29, 2017 1106 did not allow voltage change for several of us on OCN. The UEFI is supposed be removed from Asus site but delay AFAIK. 1107 is working AOK so far for several of us, in this post by Elmor. Thanks , where is 1107 downloadable at, i have not seen it Sent from my SM-N920V using Tapatalk Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
dsquitieri1 Posted April 29, 2017 Share Posted April 29, 2017 Thanks , where is 1107 downloadable at, i have not seen it Sent from my SM-N920V using Tapatalk I keep getting error when try ing to go there Sent from my SM-N920V using Tapatalk Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
zeneffect Posted April 29, 2017 Share Posted April 29, 2017 I keep getting error when trying to go there Sent from my SM-N920V using Tapatalk CROSSHAIR-VI-HERO-ASUS-1107 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
dsquitieri1 Posted April 29, 2017 Share Posted April 29, 2017 CROSSHAIR-VI-HERO-ASUS-1107 Thanks! Sent from my SM-N920V using Tapatalk Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Amd_ocer Posted April 30, 2017 Share Posted April 30, 2017 The Stilt posted this info on OCN regarding LLC on C6H, this one is also good information. Then Raja@Asus also did some oscilloscope tests, see this post, then in this post he states the same thing as The Stilt on "voltage point". Then a member did some testing of ProbeIt point vs Socket using DMM (which will not show under/overshoot like oscilloscope). The conclusion was drawn that CPU Core Voltage (SVI2 TFN) in HWiNFO is ~ what CPU get, but again as SW and slow read, accuracy is a factor IMO. So I use as "ballpark". Best post with the most useful info right there. Thanks! Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Achill3uS Posted April 30, 2017 Share Posted April 30, 2017 1106 not changing the multipiler, not working with turbov and also not changing the voltage with 1800X for me. going to test 1107 right now. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
chew* Posted April 30, 2017 Share Posted April 30, 2017 I like older bios better. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
flanker Posted May 1, 2017 Share Posted May 1, 2017 1001/1002 best for me. Im still waiting for some BIOS with more memory timings (May/June?) and good performance not only in modern benchmarks, but also in legacy. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
xoqolatl Posted May 8, 2017 Share Posted May 8, 2017 I thought I had killed my board over the weekend. I tried to adjust Vcore in TurboV Core, moved the slider from 1.6 to 1.625 V, clicked apply - instant death, code 8_. After drying everything up and waiting a few hours the board displayed only 0I (not 01 - vertical bar on 2nd segment closer to first segment), even with other CPUs, memory combinations, CMOS clear - anything I tried. I left it to sit without battery overnight and flashed 1107 this morning with USB flashback, and behold, it lives Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
flanker Posted May 9, 2017 Share Posted May 9, 2017 Sometimes, what I seen, you are doing change in turbov only "vcore", but with running of turbov are many others settings changed. Its a bug of software. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Ace123 Posted May 12, 2017 Share Posted May 12, 2017 What cooling are you running on that chew? Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
chew* Posted May 13, 2017 Share Posted May 13, 2017 What cooling are you running on that chew? That was -40c...nasty coldbug range. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
flanker Posted May 26, 2017 Share Posted May 26, 2017 (edited) Guys, did you tried last beta BIOS? CROSSHAIR-VI-HERO-ASUS-9943 Edited May 26, 2017 by flanker Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
zeneffect Posted May 27, 2017 Share Posted May 27, 2017 Guys, did you tried last beta BIOS?CROSSHAIR-VI-HERO-ASUS-9943 Yes, I went back to 1001 for 32m if that's any indication. For other stuff it might be great Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
flanker Posted May 29, 2017 Share Posted May 29, 2017 What do you think? Anyone get in? AMD Ryzen Superpi 32M challenge - 200 USD Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
chew* Posted May 29, 2017 Share Posted May 29, 2017 (edited) Want to make it more challenging...limit it to 5 gig...imo sub 6:59 is super easy...sub 6:59 is a challenge @ 5 gig sort of...i have calculated 6:46 to be realistic @ 5.0 with crappy mem speeds... A 5.4 chip can do 5:59....now that is a challenge... What your going to get is just some sloppy high clocked innefeccient score that someone wallet wins just to cash in. Make it $50 first to 6:59 @ 5gig $150 first person to 5:59 any speed... Then you will see impressively tuned proper runs Edited May 29, 2017 by chew* Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Join the conversation
You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.