Posted January 24, 20187 yr This video not intend to offend, attack or accuse any overclocker, but just prove that failures. I sent no scores since 2015, and even my best scores I did not send (we made in events and Live streams), so I am no more pro active in the League. But I keep overclocking, teaching and sharing the art of overclocking every day, that I like too much, and remember two years ago, we reported a bug in Futuremark's detection system (System Info). In it, the decrease of the base clock of the CPU changed the time and took it out of synchrony (time of the benchmark different from the time of the windows), improving the results in a unreal way. Many people criticized our work, but a few days later, Futuremark made the change and Hwbot recognized our information as legitimate: http://hwbot.org/newsflash/3225_futuremark_tightens_rtc_validation_check_following_tecmundo_and_rbuass_findings We are always studying and evaluating the possibilities and this time, again with Futuremark, we discovered a serious fault. We from GALAX team reported it to Futuremark and we hope that the problem will be corrected soon. Apart from that, we would like to make it clear that we like it very much and consider its high quality tests, and not intend to drive that question for anyone. I even noticed we have a new Revision and wish the best for Hwbot and all community. Maybe someday I will be back to the league. Sorry the broken english rbuass
January 24, 20187 yr Author I forgot! Added captions in English, since very few will understand Portuguese. Just set to see subtitles. Ronaldo
January 24, 20187 yr Great job and thanks for english captions. I think we should dump all old scores and start fresh when they can fix it or you are allowing possible cheats to benefit. Orrrrr Allow lod Edited January 24, 20187 yr by Splave
January 24, 20187 yr Good find! I have never understood why LOD banned for timespy but allowed for ALL other 3dmark??
January 24, 20187 yr Author You can't validate (or must not) Fire Strike Ultra, Extreme, Performance. The last not allow LOD
January 24, 20187 yr Author Great job and thanks for english captions. I think we should dump all old scores and start fresh when they can fix it or you are allowing possible cheats to benefit. Orrrrr Allow lod Agree Not only allow, but teach everybody how to apply to improve the scores. Don't need to worry about the old scores, but to keep fair for everyone that nice tweak from now, in my opinion. Further, there are about 50 combinations per benchmark to find the best... that's a lot of job 😠Edited January 24, 20187 yr by rbuass
January 24, 20187 yr Now find for this benchmark as well : http://hwbot.org/submission/3621696_rauf_3dmark2001_se_geforce_gtx_1080_ti_223164_marks
January 25, 20187 yr really you could have kept quiet and just benefited yourself, very gracious of you to share
January 25, 20187 yr Author really you could have kept quiet and just benefited yourself, very gracious of you to share Thanks Splave. That comment comes from you, a highest level overclocker is very nice to me. I consider very important. Best wishes.
January 26, 20187 yr Hi All, You don't have to wait for the benchmark to start running and try to trick it. When using nvidia inspector do not apply it to the "global profile" , open the drop down select the "Time Spy Profile" change the settings and hit apply. That's it no more input required. It will open and give a valid result every time while keeping the LOD settings. All The Best Hillguy Edited January 26, 20187 yr by Hillguy
January 29, 20187 yr Hi All, You don't have to wait for the benchmark to start running and try to trick it. When using nvidia inspector do not apply it to the "global profile" , open the drop down select the "Time Spy Profile" change the settings and hit apply. That's it no more input required. It will open and give a valid result every time while keeping the LOD settings. All The Best Hillguy It is exactly like that.
January 30, 20187 yr As I remember, it is not the first time that Ronaldo helps the oc community, and in the past that had not been appreciated
Join the conversation
You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.