randyenergy Posted February 13, 2018 Share Posted February 13, 2018 Excellent!! Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Dancop Posted February 13, 2018 Share Posted February 13, 2018 Not bad! Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
poparamiro Posted February 13, 2018 Share Posted February 13, 2018 Pasiune si dedicatie, bravo! Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Members GeorgeStorm Posted February 13, 2018 Members Share Posted February 13, 2018 Daym. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
ikki Posted February 13, 2018 Share Posted February 13, 2018 oh------!! Nice run!! Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Crew Vivi Posted February 13, 2018 Crew Share Posted February 13, 2018 whoaaa Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Splave Posted February 13, 2018 Share Posted February 13, 2018 Core at 2925mhz? Or Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
H2o vs. Ln2(BANNED) Posted February 13, 2018 Share Posted February 13, 2018 (edited) I am glad you are entertained Allen...just make me fart so badly Edited February 13, 2018 by H2o vs. Ln2 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
mickulty Posted February 13, 2018 Share Posted February 13, 2018 He actually did it, the absolute madman. Grats on an awesome score. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Hyperhorn Posted February 13, 2018 Share Posted February 13, 2018 For me it's interesting to see that Vince's run is faster for all finished batches after the first one with an advantage of up to 28 ms after batch 9 finished. From "Batch 19 finished" to "PI value output" however his system needs 114 ms, while Slinky is noticably faster with 98 ms. At first you might think that the higher-clocked 7980X with faster RAM outperformed the lower clocked 7960X with slower RAM in this phase of the benchmark in some way, but watching at the statistics segment it seems that some small hickup with Titan V #2 lead to the loss of the WR. Slinky's values are way more even in comparison. Anyway, congratulations! Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
FireKillerGR Posted February 13, 2018 Share Posted February 13, 2018 could it be the different version of gpupi? Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
unityofsaints Posted February 13, 2018 Share Posted February 13, 2018 Yes it's just an efficiency thing. Nothing to see here folks, Vince rerun in 3,2,1... Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
_mat_ Posted February 13, 2018 Share Posted February 13, 2018 ..., but watching at the statistics segment it seems that some small hickup with Titan V #2 lead to the loss of the WR. Slinky's values are way more even in comparison. Anyway, congratulations!Actually card #1 and #3 are the problem, card #2 was the most efficient. You have to look at the percentage of batches calculated, #2 did 32% of the whole calculation in about the same time as #1 did only 21%. On the software part, there was only a minor upgrade of the CUDA toolkit between 3.0 and 3.1, so there shouldn't be much difference. I think this is a good case for hardware efficiency through better stability.  Well done, H2o! Try GPUPI 3.2 as well, it should have a little less overhead, because it doesn't use a physical log file on a disk anymore. That could scrape off another ms maybe. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Traktor Posted February 14, 2018 Share Posted February 14, 2018 Congrads! You Did it! Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Nazar Posted February 14, 2018 Share Posted February 14, 2018 Great! By the way, what waterblock you are using on VRM?? Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
H2o vs. Ln2(BANNED) Posted February 15, 2018 Share Posted February 15, 2018 same old ek-r5e, r4e or r4be I can't confirm sorry, have to be mod as only one size will fit the screw Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Join the conversation
You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.