March 14, 20188 yr Everybody and their mother is getting 64.8 global pts on x265 4K. Working as intended?
March 17, 20188 yr Author 7 hours ago, AlphaC said: I didn't get any, so the system might just be buggy Yes... It was not so obvious when I noticed this issue, but a little after many people suddenly got + thousands of global points points from subs that seem to be just average.
March 18, 20188 yr Crew Full recalc is in progress, wished this was communicated and would have been bettter if the bot was down for a few days to speed things up. Let us hope this will go smoother than last time
March 20, 20188 yr Author 6 hours ago, richba5tard said: I've triggered a full recalc of x265 after installing the latest patch, and the rankings look great! http://hwbot.org/benchmark/hwbot_x265_benchmark_-_4k I'm going to trigger a full recalc of all applications with points now. Cool, good work. It might clear some general confusion in the future, if a kind of notice banner that informs about ongoing changes/expected anomalies is shown on the HWbot scores page...
March 20, 20188 yr 11 hours ago, richba5tard said: I've triggered a full recalc of x265 after installing the latest patch, and the rankings look great! http://hwbot.org/benchmark/hwbot_x265_benchmark_-_4k I'm going to trigger a full recalc of all applications with points now. They're looking like less bugged pts for x265, but did you pull 1c globals? http://hwbot.org/benchmark/hwbot_x265_benchmark_-_4k/rankings?cores=1#start=0#interval=20
March 20, 20188 yr Crew 1 minute ago, richba5tard said: I wonder whether this is because the #1 spot is just soo low in absolute score. HWBOT X265 took about an hour or so, but the time to recalc a ranking is related to how many submissions are linked to that ranking, and whether all points are enabled. There are 884523 rankings on hwbot (unique app / hardware combinations). 770467 if you disregard the rankings which do not award points. This is not something that can be recalculated overnight. On the test server it took 48h if i'm not mistaken, but there is no load on that server. If a full re-calc is happening, I'd definitely recommend stopping subs during that time as a minimum to try and reduce load, but still allow people to check scores etc, or even pull the site completely for a short while if it would dramatically speed up the re-calc.
March 20, 20188 yr 3 minutes ago, richba5tard said: I wonder whether this is because the #1 spot is just soo low in absolute score. Ooooh that hurt absolutely savage. But more seriously is the algorithm having issue with that?
March 20, 20188 yr I did find the issue, I think. It doesn't show if you look at the rankings but for some reason there are some non 1c scores as part of the 1c ranking. So the #1 1c score shows up as 5th globally, and it's far enough behind the "1st" score so as not to receive pts. http://hwbot.org/submission/3770515_yosarianilives_hwbot_x265_benchmark___4k_celeron_g470_0.61_fps
March 30, 20188 yr hey oh here i suppose the points for ranks #2 to 6 are not correct ?http://hwbot.org/benchmar k/hwbot_x265_benchmark_-_4k/rankings?start=0&cores=1#start=0#interval=20 same goes with hw points? http://hwbot.org/benchmark/hwbot_x265_benchmark_-_4k/rankings?hardwareTypeId=processor_2958&cores=1#start=0#interval=20
March 30, 20188 yr Crew Why do you think these are not correct? You get global points in relation to no 1 result on percentage and top 5 get bonus points on top of this. I think on hardware the same, but not sure if top 5 or top 3 now. This is determined by date of submission iirc when results are identical. This was made to prevent especially on xtu that 150 guys get top spot points at same amount. richba5tard can explain this better, but that\s the main scheme
March 30, 20188 yr Crew That's my understanding as well, looks to be rightish to me (assuming global is top5 and hw is top3)
March 30, 20188 yr 8 hours ago, websmile said: Why do you think these are not correct? You get global points in relation to no 1 result on percentage and top 5 get bonus points on top of this. I think on hardware the same, but not sure if top 5 or top 3 now. This is determined by date of submission iirc when results are identical. This was made to prevent especially on xtu that 150 guys get top spot points at same amount. richba5tard can explain this better, but that\s the main scheme ok got it, i was stuck with rev6, sams rank = same score top10 would have been nicer Edited March 30, 20188 yr by bolc
Join the conversation
You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.