TASOS Posted December 4, 2018 Share Posted December 4, 2018 At this point , i would like to remind (once again) , that teams still get TPP , from buggy and non existent benchmarks The first time i mentioned that a couple of months ago ... i was not listened. And now we are talking about removing TPP from inactive team members. I dont know where we are heading. 1 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
richba5tard Posted December 4, 2018 Author Share Posted December 4, 2018 1 minute ago, TASOS said: At this point , i would like to remind (once again) , that teams still get TPP , from buggy and non existent benchmarks The first time i mentioned that a couple of months ago ... i was not listened. And now we are talking about removing TPP from inactive team members. I dont know where we are heading. Removing buggy benchmarks is fine by me, but is unrelated to the point algorithm. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
TASOS Posted December 4, 2018 Share Posted December 4, 2018 (edited) 24 minutes ago, richba5tard said: Removing buggy benchmarks is fine by me, but is unrelated to the point algorithm. Yes I agree that is not relative to the point algorithm. But it's an example of "not fair handle" in between similar facts about team points. In case 1 , we dont want TPP from inactive members In case 2 , we award teams with HTPP and GTPP , for non existent benchmarks and buggy benchmarks too. I dont know if you undestand what i'm trying to say here. EDIT : i was referring to ucbench and hwbot prime Edited December 4, 2018 by TASOS Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Members GeorgeStorm Posted December 4, 2018 Members Share Posted December 4, 2018 45 minutes ago, TASOS said: Yes I agree that is not relative to the point algorithm. But it's an example of "not fair handle" in between similar facts about team points. In case 1 , we dont want TPP from inactive members In case 2 , we award teams with HTPP and GTPP , for non existent benchmarks and buggy benchmarks too. I dont know if you undestand what i'm trying to say here. EDIT : i was referring to ucbench and hwbot prime I see your point and agree, in that if you're going to remove TPP from inactive members, TPP in general should be looked at (in terms of what benches get it, much in the same way it's regularly looked at for hw and global points) Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Mr.Scott Posted December 4, 2018 Share Posted December 4, 2018 10 hours ago, TASOS said: Scott If an old team member , with a 10 year old sub , is still best of it's class ... (today's team benchers cant even come close to his scores) , no TPP ??? No, because he is no longer actively benching for his team. That doesn't take away from a legendary score at all. It's just his team will not be able to profit from it forever due to not benching any more. Can't help your team if you don't bench. 8 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
bigblock990 Posted December 4, 2018 Share Posted December 4, 2018 33 minutes ago, Mr.Scott said: No, because he is no longer actively benching for his team. That doesn't take away from a legendary score at all. It's just his team will not be able to profit from it forever due to not benching any more. Can't help your team if you don't bench. Boom nailed it. 4 2 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest Posted December 5, 2018 Share Posted December 5, 2018 Dead wood Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
richba5tard Posted December 5, 2018 Author Share Posted December 5, 2018 @TASOS Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
TASOS Posted December 5, 2018 Share Posted December 5, 2018 10 hours ago, Mr.Scott said: No, because he is no longer actively benching for his team. That doesn't take away from a legendary score at all. It's just his team will not be able to profit from it forever due to not benching any more. Can't help your team if you don't bench. I have the right to disagree ... and i do. 2 1 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
TASOS Posted December 5, 2018 Share Posted December 5, 2018 1 hour ago, richba5tard said: @TASOS Yes , that's a nice move for 2019 But in the meanwhile , delete all GTPP and HTPP for Hwbot prime and UCbench , that dont exist but keep altering the Team Rankings. 2 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Mr.Scott Posted December 5, 2018 Share Posted December 5, 2018 13 hours ago, TASOS said: I have the right to disagree ... and i do. It's ok. We don't have to agree, and I don't hold it against you. 1 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
richba5tard Posted December 6, 2018 Author Share Posted December 6, 2018 I shall make a poll whether inactive members should contribute to rankings or not, as it seems to divide the community. I'll also make one for which 3d benches need to keep global points. Are polls needed for hardware points too? Or is that fine as is? 3 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
bigblock990 Posted December 6, 2018 Share Posted December 6, 2018 7 minutes ago, richba5tard said: I shall make a poll whether inactive members should contribute to rankings or not, as it seems to divide the community. I'll also make one for which 3d benches need to keep global points. Are polls needed for hardware points too? Or is that fine as is? Make a poll please. 1 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Fasttrack Posted December 6, 2018 Share Posted December 6, 2018 1 hour ago, richba5tard said: I shall make a poll whether inactive members should contribute to rankings or not, as it seems to divide the community. I'll also make one for which 3d benches need to keep global points. Are polls needed for hardware points too? Or is that fine as is? It is indeed a very nice and hopeful change, that the community's opinions are taken into account. Because the "climate" till several months back ( all understand what I mean ), was "our way or piss off". Respect 1 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
richba5tard Posted December 6, 2018 Author Share Posted December 6, 2018 I have no strong opinions on which should get points and which not. Obviously I prefer benchmarks which integrate well with HWBOT, but no point in stuffing benchmarks down your throat. ? Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
ozzie Posted December 7, 2018 Share Posted December 7, 2018 how bout this then fred ? have a few coldies with micahel and a good yak about it, after all hes been here for years and knows what benches work for whatever and what doesnt and been the comps mod for years, seems a good idea to me Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
o_professore Posted December 16, 2018 Share Posted December 16, 2018 @richba5tard I sent you some private messages, could you read it and reply me, please? I'm waiting for you almost half year. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
ozzie Posted December 16, 2018 Share Posted December 16, 2018 ^^^^ sounds familiar Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
richba5tard Posted December 17, 2018 Author Share Posted December 17, 2018 On 12/16/2018 at 1:40 AM, o_professore said: @richba5tard I sent you some private messages, could you read it and reply me, please? I'm waiting for you almost half year. I barely ever respond to pm's. Nothing personal @o_professore Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
richba5tard Posted December 17, 2018 Author Share Posted December 17, 2018 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
richba5tard Posted December 17, 2018 Author Share Posted December 17, 2018 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Administrators websmile Posted December 29, 2018 Administrators Share Posted December 29, 2018 So we still have no security rules for marketplace like 60 days joined for access? I also cannot find forum rules where this should be stated. Is this goig to be changed or will we have this forever now?^^ Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
MetalRacer Posted December 29, 2018 Share Posted December 29, 2018 Would be nice to see some type of recourse taken against the swindlers such as such as HWBOT accounts banned and all submissions removed. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Cautilus Posted December 30, 2018 Share Posted December 30, 2018 I would agree with some marketplace restrictions, with formal rules & consequences for bad behaviour. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
ozzie Posted December 30, 2018 Share Posted December 30, 2018 might wanna include 1 rule for all and not another for the selected as well Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Join the conversation
You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.