Crew Leeghoofd Posted February 10, 2019 Crew Share Posted February 10, 2019 (edited) - No limitations on processor speed. - Both Retail and ES hardware are allowed, however no server hardware, ASrock and no LGA 3467 setups - Single processor sockets only!! - PRO OC round 1 will focus on 2D only, The next round same CPU specs but with GPU limitation and 3D only. Round 3 will be a mix of 2D & 3D Current stages: Cinebench Extreme Superpi 32M Geekbench 4 multicore Memory maximum frequency Start date 15/02/2019 at 12:00 CET -- Closing date 15/04/2019 12:00 Verification screenshot includes: Full res desktop screenie, no clipping allowed!!! The Taskbar remains fully visible, including the iwndows time For maximum memory frequency, memory: only CPU-Z memory tab required on the competition background. And a validation link ofc For the other stages: CPU-Z for CPU, memory and mainboard tab are required Edited February 10, 2019 by Leeghoofd 3 1 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Rauf Posted February 11, 2019 Share Posted February 11, 2019 I like that you banned Asrock! 1 2 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Crew Leeghoofd Posted February 11, 2019 Author Crew Share Posted February 11, 2019 No clue how that error got here 1 4 1 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Crew Leeghoofd Posted February 13, 2019 Author Crew Share Posted February 13, 2019 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Splave Posted February 14, 2019 Share Posted February 14, 2019 On 2/11/2019 at 5:52 AM, Leeghoofd said: No clue how that error got here 1 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Splave Posted February 14, 2019 Share Posted February 14, 2019 Memory maximum frequency Is there a percentage we can work with from valid to screenshot ( I forget what is normally used ) Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Crew Leeghoofd Posted February 14, 2019 Author Crew Share Posted February 14, 2019 (edited) yes sir ASRock, 2% btn screenie and validation file (the latter counts ofc) was the standard, but with current memory speeds 1% might be more relastic. Wha t do you guys think Edited February 14, 2019 by Leeghoofd 2 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Splave Posted February 14, 2019 Share Posted February 14, 2019 1% is fine I think if we only need 1 cpuz window Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
bigblock990 Posted February 14, 2019 Share Posted February 14, 2019 Looks good Leeghoofd 1 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Splave Posted February 15, 2019 Share Posted February 15, 2019 is the APEX XI and GENE XI allowed as its not widely available in north america? thx Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Crew Leeghoofd Posted February 15, 2019 Author Crew Share Posted February 15, 2019 In pro anything goes besides server and lga46575858 1 2 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Splave Posted February 16, 2019 Share Posted February 16, 2019 Any ideas for extreme r15. There is no way to avoid covering the render. This is at 1920x1080 1 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Noxinite Posted February 16, 2019 Share Posted February 16, 2019 (edited) With AMD/Nvidia new cards you can upscale the resolution of your monitor. Nvidia DSR and I don't remember for AMD. Edited February 16, 2019 by Noxinite 1 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Mr.Scott Posted February 16, 2019 Share Posted February 16, 2019 (edited) VSR on AMD. 260X and newer. Other than that, you need a 4K monitor. Edited February 16, 2019 by Mr.Scott 1 1 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Crew Leeghoofd Posted February 16, 2019 Author Crew Share Posted February 16, 2019 (edited) 3 hours ago, Splave said: Any ideas for extreme r15. There is no way to avoid covering the render. This is at 1920x1080 we have to double the screenies than, one full screen with the score and rendered scene, add a 2nd with required CPUz and the CB screen bit moved to the right.. Edited February 16, 2019 by Leeghoofd Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Mr.Scott Posted February 16, 2019 Share Posted February 16, 2019 1 hour ago, Leeghoofd said: we have to double the screenies than, one full screen with the score and rendered scene, add a 2nd with required CPUz and the CB screen bit moved to the right.. This would be considered acceptable then? 1 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Crew Leeghoofd Posted February 16, 2019 Author Crew Share Posted February 16, 2019 yes 2 screenies required for one sub IF you can't display the background, CPU-Z and rendered scene in the same screenie ofc 1 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Splave Posted February 16, 2019 Share Posted February 16, 2019 Thankyou Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
macsbeach98 Posted February 16, 2019 Share Posted February 16, 2019 Wasnt the idea of having to show the full render to stop cheats modifying it to get a boost in the score. How the hell can that be legal the right side and bottom half of the render is off the screen in both shots bring on the cheats. 1 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Crew Leeghoofd Posted February 16, 2019 Author Crew Share Posted February 16, 2019 Hence why it is a beta, we just want to see how it performs, so sad that immediately we think of cheating... Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
macsbeach98 Posted February 16, 2019 Share Posted February 16, 2019 Alby I dont admire your job of moderating scores and making sure everything is above board I was just pointing out the obvious. I myself wont be submitting it until I have a monitor for it. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
bigblock990 Posted February 16, 2019 Share Posted February 16, 2019 1 hour ago, Leeghoofd said: Hence why it is a beta, we just want to see how it performs, so sad that immediately we think of cheating... Two screens as you laid out seems like a perfectly acceptable workaround to test this bench for the compo 1 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Bulshooter Posted February 16, 2019 Share Posted February 16, 2019 32M Error i cant upload a score, system said wrong Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
ksateaaa23 Posted February 17, 2019 Share Posted February 17, 2019 (edited) 11 hours ago, Leeghoofd said: we have to double the screenies than, one full screen with the score and rendered scene, add a 2nd with required CPUz and the CB screen bit moved to the right.. rendered scene is not full. we had a discussion on our forums and full image can be fit only in 2k resolution. for cpu-z tabs little space is needed. so 2715*1527 fits evrything comfortably. now i am using 2880*1620. all new nvidia cards starting from gtx 970 onwards support it.(DSR) and all amd cards starting from r7 260 series.(VSR). most subs (almost 70% )should go either because image blocked or rendered image not full. how about having a rule, what to be accepted. another way is just to ignore everything since it's beta bench....... Edited February 17, 2019 by ksateaaa23 2 1 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
phil Posted February 17, 2019 Share Posted February 17, 2019 Tested as suggested with DSR on a GT 710 (fish),looks the way to go. 2 2 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Join the conversation
You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.