ObscureParadox_3XS Posted January 30, 2020 Share Posted January 30, 2020 Could also say just Pentium 4 DDR2? That way it if anyone wants to use a 478 to 775 adapter they're more than welcome to. It wouldn't be as competitive but it's opens up the options a bit 1 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
bigblock990 Posted January 30, 2020 Share Posted January 30, 2020 @mickulty It wasn't me who made the agp suggestion Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
mickulty Posted January 30, 2020 Share Posted January 30, 2020 1 hour ago, bigblock990 said: @mickulty It wasn't me who made the agp suggestion Apologies, i misread... we can blame @Noxinite instead Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
mickulty Posted January 30, 2020 Share Posted January 30, 2020 2 hours ago, ObscureParadox said: Could also say just Pentium 4 DDR2? That way it if anyone wants to use a 478 to 775 adapter they're more than welcome to. It wouldn't be as competitive but it's opens up the options a bit Yeah I think that's sensible. I'm a big fan of there being plenty of options, same as how AMD+DDR1+AGP implies you could run a Duron and that's fine. Simpler rules, more people can enter, people can make silly subs for fun, doesn't mess with the 'meta'. Probably a good idea to ban Xeons though because otherwise it'll turn into an all-Dempsey competition. So the stipulations would be: DDR2 only CPUs from the Netburst (Pentium 4, 65nm), Netburst (Pentium 4, 90nm), Netburst (Pentium 4, 130nm) and Netburst (Pentium 4, 180nm) families No Xeons 1 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
ground Posted January 30, 2020 Share Posted January 30, 2020 (edited) 775, no intel chipsets, 9x multiplier, Geekbench 3 Singlecore (or any other bench thats somewhat mem related) and ddr2 Edited January 30, 2020 by ground1556 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
ObscureParadox_3XS Posted January 30, 2020 Share Posted January 30, 2020 13 minutes ago, ground1556 said: 775, no intel chipsets, 9x multiplier, Geekbench 3 Singlecore (or any other bench thats somewhat mem related) Some people just want to watch the world burn 5 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
yosarianilives Posted January 30, 2020 Share Posted January 30, 2020 47 minutes ago, ObscureParadox said: Some people just want to watch the world burn 55 minutes ago, ground1556 said: 775, no intel chipsets, 9x multiplier, Geekbench 3 Singlecore (or any other bench thats somewhat mem related) I too like having to bin boards for working status, not binning for mhz 1 2 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
ground Posted January 30, 2020 Share Posted January 30, 2020 alternatively most creative destruction of a 775 nvidia board (video required) Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
mickulty Posted January 30, 2020 Share Posted January 30, 2020 1 hour ago, ground1556 said: 775, no intel chipsets, 9x multiplier, Geekbench 3 Singlecore (or any other bench thats somewhat mem related) and ddr2 Restrict it to single channel as well so i can be competitive with my half-broken Fatality F-I90HD rather than having to use an nvidia board ? I hate this suggestion but only on an emotional level, not a logical one, which I think means it's actually a good idea. I'm suspicious that it comes 2 hours after I posted a garbage refclk sub with a comment complaining about my new nvidia board though... Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
yosarianilives Posted February 11, 2020 Share Posted February 11, 2020 Couple stage ideas: ddr3 - hwbot prime 30m lga 1155 ddr3 - system stability tester 32m pi - per core fm2 and am3+ ddr3 - amd 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 8 core ycruncher 1b ddr2 - ycruncher 25m per core ddr2 - mathbench ddr1 - speedsys ddr1 - test cpu ddr4 - ycruncher 10b per core misc - pcmark android Would be nice to see some benches that don't get any love have stages. If there's any reason that we don't see these benches normally (ie; blackhole is a slot machine) would be interested to know as I don't have the history myself. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
mickulty Posted February 11, 2020 Share Posted February 11, 2020 9 minutes ago, yosarianilives said: ddr3 - amd 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 8 core ycruncher 1b Hahaha yes, this. I'm in favour of all ycruncher stages but this in particular. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
yosarianilives Posted February 11, 2020 Share Posted February 11, 2020 8 minutes ago, mickulty said: Hahaha yes, this. I'm in favour of all ycruncher stages but this in particular. Indeed! All kinds of glorious fullpot action combined with a solid mix fx and am3, also known as two of the best oc platforms ever made Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
cbjaust Posted February 11, 2020 Share Posted February 11, 2020 What about a GPUPI for CPU per core AMD DDR3 stage? 1 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
ozzie Posted April 29, 2020 Share Posted April 29, 2020 what ever is decided doesnt really matter what benches , theyre always good well put together benches for comps, great competiton from countries from all over the world, good blokes in it, and the mods always do a great job with it, the teams cup is the best comp bot has ever run IMO, year after year , i missed the last one hopefully not this one, ddr4 boards i think it should be a board that most of the ddr4 boys have got or can get quite easily for the comp, of course theres a difference between the LN2 board and non LN2 boards in ddr4 which i think is something to be considered in whatever stages chosen for the ddr4 section there is a question id like to ask also , now that bot has been taken over has the system/data base been fixed or addressed for results, ??? year after year weve had this issues of the data base not being able to keep up and compute scores for teams correctly, regardless of what comp, will it be the same this year and is the the OC-ESPORTS link fixed to follow it, that has been a problem in past years ,personally i find it easier and much more easier to follow than the home page on bot to follow and navigate to for the comp/s cheers Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
chispy Posted May 4, 2020 Share Posted May 4, 2020 (edited) Would like to see 01 back to life , maybe in old platforms 775 or 1366 and gtx 7600gt or amd 2600 xt , back to using xp ... Edited May 4, 2020 by chispy 1 1 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
yosarianilives Posted May 11, 2020 Share Posted May 11, 2020 With a potential start of Mid June or Early July would be good to start announcing stages if possible. I know you're busy with everything going on so if you don't have time no worries Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
ozzie Posted May 22, 2020 Share Posted May 22, 2020 i would suggest b4 any more comps go ahead that bot gets the site sorted out "properly" this time, long long overdue, or do we need another revision implemented? like the last 4 or so that we had to have that did bugger all except create more confusion on top of the already confusion , and it isnt bots mods fault, they do a great job with what they get given, if it were me id be paying someone like matt thats doing benchmate to go thru it and fix it "once and for all", coz otherwise i can see the same sort of stuff of the past happening again Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Crew Leeghoofd Posted May 24, 2020 Author Crew Share Posted May 24, 2020 We will need to continue the fight or struggle as I like to call it, to work with what we have. I'm expecting slow but positive changes in the upcoming months. The programmers (old and new) had a solid meeting how this beast ticks. I honestly had no clue what they were talking about but it was clear that urgent updates to the code need to be implemented asap and a dedicated follow up is mandatory. A test server has been created already to see how the engine reacts to new or optimized code. But I'd rather not want it to be a rush job. These competition and submission boints need to be spot on and not like now, hit and miss. Sadly many lack the patience to wait for it... And think changes happen over nite... 2 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
ozzie Posted May 24, 2020 Share Posted May 24, 2020 thats fair enough alby, least theyre having a go at it, ? Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest Digg_de Posted June 1, 2020 Share Posted June 1, 2020 Is it DDR1-DDR4 again? I want SuperPI 32m with DDR1, DDR2, DDR3 and DDR4. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Crew Leeghoofd Posted June 1, 2020 Author Crew Share Posted June 1, 2020 28 minutes ago, Digg_de said: Is it DDR1-DDR4 again? I want SuperPI 32m with DDR1, DDR2, DDR3 and DDR4. Maybe but maybe not.... Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
ground Posted June 1, 2020 Share Posted June 1, 2020 6x multiplier ddr2 or ddr3 Geekbench 3 Multicore (no multi CPU) Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
yosarianilives Posted June 1, 2020 Share Posted June 1, 2020 (edited) 37 minutes ago, ground1556 said: 6x multiplier ddr2 or ddr3 Geekbench 3 Multicore (no multi CPU) I like this stage cause it implies that you can run amd and that'd be perfectly fine even if you wouldn't do very well. Make it ddr2 though, I don't want to have to source big chips on lga 2011, pretty sure ivy has enough ipc+cores that even at 600 mhz it'd win let alone with bclk and straps Edited June 1, 2020 by yosarianilives Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
ground Posted June 1, 2020 Share Posted June 1, 2020 1 hour ago, yosarianilives said: I like this stage cause it implies that you can run amd and that'd be perfectly fine even if you wouldn't do very well. Make it ddr2 though, I don't want to have to source big chips on lga 2011, pretty sure ivy has enough ipc+cores that even at 600 mhz it'd win let alone with bclk and straps no 6x multi available on modern stuff as far as I know. Starting at 8x... Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
keeph8n Posted June 1, 2020 Share Posted June 1, 2020 Let the ES chips play on that new new 1 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Join the conversation
You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.