superpatodonaldo Posted November 11, 2020 Share Posted November 11, 2020 don't remember if already asked: ryzen 5xxx allowed ot not? Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Crew Leeghoofd Posted November 11, 2020 Crew Share Posted November 11, 2020 38 minutes ago, superpatodonaldo said: don't remember if already asked: ryzen 5xxx allowed ot not? nope sorry no Vermeer 2 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Crew Leeghoofd Posted November 11, 2020 Crew Share Posted November 11, 2020 1 hour ago, Digg_de said: HWBOT Country Cup 2020 - Memory Frequency Verification screenshot includes CPUZ 1.94 (or newer) tabs for CPU, Memory & Motherboard. (For 3D GPUZ and GPUZ sensor tab) No SPD Tab? no it is okay, we can see that in the CPUZ verification link Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
SpinCykle Posted November 12, 2020 Share Posted November 12, 2020 Hello, I've tried to submit a Port Royal Score for Stage 1 and I'm receiving this error... "This submission was made with an Engineering Sample or unreleased hardware" Why is this happening? I'm not using either an ES or unreleased hardware? Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Crew Leeghoofd Posted November 12, 2020 Crew Share Posted November 12, 2020 58 minutes ago, SpinCykle said: Hello, I've tried to submit a Port Royal Score for Stage 1 and I'm receiving this error... "This submission was made with an Engineering Sample or unreleased hardware" Why is this happening? I'm not using either an ES or unreleased hardware? Don't submit with a XTU profile, enter all the hardware manually Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
SpinCykle Posted November 12, 2020 Share Posted November 12, 2020 1 hour ago, Leeghoofd said: Don't submit with a XTU profile, enter all the hardware manually Thanks, I thought I tried that and was still running into an error. Maybe my score was accepted. I knew it wasn't going to be in the top 5 but I'd still like to participate. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Crew Leeghoofd Posted November 12, 2020 Crew Share Posted November 12, 2020 1 hour ago, SpinCykle said: Thanks, I thought I tried that and was still running into an error. Maybe my score was accepted. I knew it wasn't going to be in the top 5 but I'd still like to participate. There's no software that I would know off besides XTU that would give this error while submitting. If you want you can pass me the screenshot and FM link and I can try to sub it for you Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Crew Leeghoofd Posted November 13, 2020 Crew Share Posted November 13, 2020 Small update on the Unigine stage: thx to user Gt403cyl it became apparent that Unigine's website does not support multiple GPU configurations. This means if you submit the score to their website the verification link afterwards will not work (404 error) Therefore we will remove the verification link for this competition. The request was forwarded that their leaderboard would support multiple GPU configurations in the future. 3 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Crew Leeghoofd Posted November 16, 2020 Crew Share Posted November 16, 2020 KRIEG Mathbench received another update for better score stability. Version 1.2 required for future subs gents 1 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
superpatodonaldo Posted November 16, 2020 Share Posted November 16, 2020 hope next time no update during the comp... it's a non-sense 1 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
ginger_nuts81 Posted November 16, 2020 Share Posted November 16, 2020 1 hour ago, Leeghoofd said: KRIEG Mathbench received another update for better score stability. Version 1.2 required for future subs gents This is making it difficult to sandbag scores you know 1 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Crew Leeghoofd Posted November 16, 2020 Crew Share Posted November 16, 2020 I still have version 1.3 by Benchmate up my sleeve... 2 2 1 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
yosarianilives Posted November 16, 2020 Author Share Posted November 16, 2020 11 hours ago, superpatodonaldo said: hope next time no update during the comp... it's a non-sense If you found the glitches that caused the need for update you'd understand, pretty sure will need version 1.3 as there's a MAJOR flaw that wasn't patched in 1.2. Waiting on dev response but they reply quickly so perhaps it will be fixed. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
TASOS Posted November 17, 2020 Share Posted November 17, 2020 23 hours ago, Leeghoofd said: KRIEG Mathbench received another update for better score stability. Version 1.2 required for future subs gents Is there any chance that version 1.1 scores higher than 1.2 ? or there is something wrong with my system ? Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
ginger_nuts81 Posted November 17, 2020 Share Posted November 17, 2020 52 minutes ago, TASOS said: Is there any chance that version 1.1 scores higher than 1.2 ? or there is something wrong with my system ? Personally I found it scored similar on my E8400 and 2600x 1 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
superpatodonaldo Posted November 17, 2020 Share Posted November 17, 2020 I mean, if we don't know very well how it runs or if it's bugged and so on, we don't need it for a big comp like this ? 1 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
ginger_nuts81 Posted November 17, 2020 Share Posted November 17, 2020 I personally think knowing how it calculates a score and knowing how the calculations are done would be great as well. Patch notes would be icing on the top Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Matsglobetrotter Posted November 17, 2020 Share Posted November 17, 2020 I think that there need to be a time to mature/quarantine new hardware and new benchmarks before they are used in competitions/point giving challenges. like 2-3 months even if scores are posted on the bot. For hardware. Based on that some new ryzens have even been noticed to break even CPUz with wrong reporting. Thus any new hardware need to be going through informal tests by users and experts on a number of benchers before they are confirmed. To for example update benchmate or other envelope. For benchmarks. Based on that its not fair to have updates in the middle of competition to have to re-run scores based on issues found. Meanwhile cudos to the developers who keep correcting the issues found and for the guys who can actually find such issues ? 1 1 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Crew Leeghoofd Posted November 17, 2020 Crew Share Posted November 17, 2020 Mathbench was in beta for a long time, it was requested to be used. Now some glitches were found with older hardware & affinity and directly fixed by the dev team. Aren't we slightly overreacting? Like has your country already 4 LN2'ed scores done? With the development team immediately reacting/fixing I think this competition is ideal to get stuff sorted. 1 1 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest Digg_de Posted November 17, 2020 Share Posted November 17, 2020 (edited) Germany not sure about Math Bench Stage. AMD DDR2 optimal using is a AM2 Board + AM3 CPU and AM2+ Board + AM3 CPU for two Scores? Or has the CPU to be AM2 and AM2+ also Board? Edited November 17, 2020 by Digg_de Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Crew Leeghoofd Posted November 17, 2020 Crew Share Posted November 17, 2020 It has been configured by CPU socket, so if its an AM3 cpu it will count as an AM3 , unless there's some weird bug in the code (don't be surprised), other possible selection was mobo socket. 1 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
yosarianilives Posted November 17, 2020 Author Share Posted November 17, 2020 56 minutes ago, Digg_de said: Germany not sure about Math Bench Stage. AMD DDR2 optimal using is a AM2 Board + AM3 CPU and AM2+ Board + AM3 CPU for two Scores? Or has the CPU to be AM2 and AM2+ also Board? Optimal list is something like 1090t, qx9650, x5470, and ??? Og phenom could be used but they kinda suck so may lose to qx9300 or socket F 1 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
superpatodonaldo Posted November 18, 2020 Share Posted November 18, 2020 19 hours ago, Leeghoofd said: Mathbench was in beta for a long time, it was requested to be used. Now some glitches were found with older hardware & affinity and directly fixed by the dev team. Aren't we slightly overreacting? Like has your country already 4 LN2'ed scores done? With the development team immediately reacting/fixing I think this competition is ideal to get stuff sorted. imo it could be used in an other comp, not a big one like CC or TC, but, I repeat, just my opinion btw no problem, will improve it Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
unityofsaints Posted November 18, 2020 Share Posted November 18, 2020 1 hour ago, superpatodonaldo said: imo it could be used in an other comp, not a big one like CC or TC, but, I repeat, just my opinion There are other comps? ? 1 1 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
ProKoN Posted November 20, 2020 Share Posted November 20, 2020 Stage 10 hyper pi 32 m Is this per cpu socket? Are we allowed to disable cores and hyperthreading? Thanks in advance Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Join the conversation
You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.