In the end AMD in this golden era can not give any sample for winer or lacky draw?

Maybe they will.

Corrected below

Edited April 29, 20215 yr by GTI-R

Will Cezanne be legal for this competition? I feel it should be, as it is AMD.

Edit: maybe not legal for the competition until the products are actually announced. To be fair, the ES versions of Cezanne have been available second-hand for quite a while now.

Edited March 15, 20215 yr by Sparky's__Adventure

To me It's just "all in", including upcoming CPUs. It's not a real competition, more like exploring the limits, thus the 1 year lifespan.

It can be divided to sub-categories/stages, if there was some sort of a "official" ranking.

Edited March 15, 20215 yr by I.nfraR.ed

3 hours ago, I.nfraR.ed said:

To me It's just "all in", including upcoming CPUs. It's not a real competition, more like exploring the limits, thus the 1 year lifespan.

It can be divided to sub-categories/stages, if there was some sort of a "official" ranking.

Does it provide comp points and stuff? Personally I'd agree I like it being all in but I know generally comp legality goes by comp start date

its a lowest clock possible yes?

I want to challenge
I don't know how to turn 5600X into 5G

Is this about the lowest clock or longest runtime?

shortest time with CPU at 5GHz or less

On 5/9/2021 at 1:12 AM, cbjaust said:

shortest time with CPU at 5GHz or less

Or base clocks 3.7ghz.

So.. we just allowing obvious 5031mhz now in the LCC.. or mods asleep on holiday? Last time i checked.. subbing a cheat got you ban from comp. My how the bots changed.

Mat is crosschecking this with the Hwinfo guy. I'm awaiting further news.(look at the date...).. So any other problem?

 

I have provided some more details as a comment under the submission in question.

Don't think it is an intentional cheat and doesn't deserve bans or something like that, just doesn't belong to the LLC competition.

It would be plain stupid to still show the actual clock in cpuz if trying to deceive others.

It might be a simple mistake with setting 100.6 instead of 100.06 bclk, although I don't know what is the minimal step that Asus board allows.

Benchmate version used seems to be the same as in my test run, but for some reason doesn't show the maximum effective clock - might be due to different win10 build (older) or the benchmate build itself?

PS: The score is "impossible" with the claimed clocks, unless someone finds a magical tweak. Have to try newer agesa though, there might be slight improvement in performance.

Edited December 27, 20214 yr by I.nfraR.ed

I already Pm'ed Mat your info 

and another one...