Jump to content
HWBOT Community Forums

HWBOT UNIGINE RULES DISCUSSION THREAD


Leeghoofd
 Share

Recommended Posts

  • Leeghoofd pinned this topic
  • 5 months later...
  • Crew
On 1/30/2021 at 2:41 AM, Leeghoofd said:

UNIGINE SUPERPOSITION SERIES

Unigine is another pay2win app?
Or is there a way to validate the free edition? Couldn't find it, any guides for oldies?

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • Crew
5 hours ago, Leeghoofd said:

Yes you need a registered version to validate on their site

Thank you. I don't have problems to buy certain benchmarks, I just can't catch up with all them changing around. Half a year ago I bench them all one way, now half of them doesn't work that way anymore.
Another reason why 3D01, Spi, Pifast are my favourite :D

Link to comment
Share on other sites

4 hours ago, Leeghoofd said:

There's no fix, it is not officially supported, hence why there's no multi GPU ranking on their site

:(
So since the rules require vali link multi GPU subs for superposition are no longer possible?

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • Crew

Yes multi GPUs are allowed, just add the link. If there is something fishy I can ask it to the Unigine Team to check it...

On your side it just errors out as they have no official leaderboard for it.

  • Like 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • 2 months later...
  • Crew

@Leeghoofd, I've posted two Superposition results under my profile and now the first link is dead. I see it in my profile but it's unpublished. And I can't see a way to publish them both, only one. Could you clear out, how exactly do I provide a validation link for each submission?

TIA.

Edited by Antinomy
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Yeah, I noticed that happened too with a previous Superposition result when I subbed something for the team cup. It would appear that Unigine's site only allows for single submission to be public facing/published at any given point.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • Crew
2 hours ago, Mr.Scott said:

Just delete the valid link requirement in the comp.

It's not just about the comp, all subs require valid links. And as I see, you can only make one link public at a time. So for 20 subs on different cards you need like what, 20 keys? So much for their HWBot support.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • Crew

Nobody will,

 

Reply from unigine guys

User can select which link to publish. It's done simply because in other way there would be garbage results in the global leaderboards submitted by the same person multiple times. So in each preset you can select only a single score that you want to display in public.

 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • Crew
15 hours ago, Leeghoofd said:

It's done simply because in other way there would be garbage results in the global leaderboards submitted by the same person multiple times.

Well, there's that little company UL that doesn't seem to have such a problem.
So I've thrown my money for nothing...

  

19 minutes ago, Mr.Scott said:

Omit the link then. I mean, is it really needed?


I suppose the initial idea was to validate everything that can be validated.

Edited by Antinomy
Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • Crew
5 hours ago, klopcha said:

For each new benchmark, it would be good to specify the minimum requirements: version of the Windows, CPU (SSE 2/3/4...), GPU (SM 2/3/4...or DX version).

not gonna complicate the current rules with info one can derive himself

 

7 hours ago, Antinomy said:

Well, there's that little company UL that doesn't seem to have such a problem.
So I've thrown my money for nothing...

I suppose the initial idea was to validate everything that can be validated.

Unigine is looking into our proposals...

Link to comment
Share on other sites

2 hours ago, Leeghoofd said:

Unigine is looking into our proposals...

Allow special setting in account to show all submissions. They can keep default setting as "show only the best sub" but user should be able to override it.

Or, let their rankings show only best sub from user while other submissions are being kept available and accessible using direct link.

Edited by TerraRaptor
  • Like 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • Crew
3 hours ago, Leeghoofd said:

not gonna complicate the current rules with info one can derive himself

Well, the requirements would indeed be very nice to see. You never know what new tests require or new versions of old ones like Benchmate a month or two ago after an update.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

 Share

×
×
  • Create New...