March 11, 201114 yr Was at the office of TONES (http://www.tones.be) today to check out their latest hardware and found this in the 2600K trays: Looks like Intel engineering failed at "previous + 1" numbering.
March 11, 201114 yr is that possible? the right side looks like 3.48 than 3.40 GHz to me lol Both are 3.40, the other one is just blurred out.
March 11, 201114 yr Author Graphical code is different though Yes. Need to upgrade my eyes to read graphical code
March 11, 201114 yr told you you need to look the whole SN, not only the last 4 digits at least both of these can come under one warranty
March 11, 201114 yr Intel QC for SB just laughing when they saw retail end customer started to do cpu binning for them:) From thousands of 2600Ks sold worlwide only a few that can go >5.8Ghz..a few in Japan, two in Europe and one in US and a little bit more that can go >5.7Ghz worldwide..So far Of course a few probly can be found at "in house" mobo makers QVT testing lab and probly a lot of peep that own 2600K but never bother to try boot up at >56X Dunno abot 2500K though.. Edited March 12, 201114 yr by dumo
March 11, 201114 yr Oh GOD ... not again Intel Investigating Sale of Fake Core I7 Chip http://www.pcworld.com/article/190983/intel_investigating_sale_of_fake_core_i7_chip.html
March 11, 201114 yr 5150 vs 5350 or so. Need to check my little green book. Keep me posted on the new load at Tones (I assume all are the same batch)?
March 12, 201114 yr Oh GOD ... not again Intel Investigating Sale of Fake Core I7 Chip http://www.pcworld.com/article/190983/intel_investigating_sale_of_fake_core_i7_chip.html That's from last May
March 12, 201114 yr That's from last May I know. But now we have Massman-Gate ... which is from ... yesterday , and Intel is going to investigate further. Anyway , dont bother. I was joking
Join the conversation
You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.