Jump to content
HWBOT Community Forums

Athlon64 3000+ Newcastle S754

Recommended Posts



there are many sockel 939 results in the sockel 754 category of this cpu in Superpi.


I have reported some results 2 times but nothing changed, for now i cant report this results because of moderated by hwbot crew.




most of the results have'nt any verification.


http://www.hwbot.org/result.do?resultId=506883 no verification


http://www.hwbot.org/result.do?resultId=719498 2nd place, verification = link to forum post = sockel 939 Winchester


http://www.hwbot.org/result.do?resultId=525888 no verification

http://www.hwbot.org/result.do?resultId=511146 wrong verification, not possible with this speed

http://www.hwbot.org/result.do?resultId=504201 wrong verification, Description: A64 Mobile DTR 3000+ 2808MHz...

http://www.hwbot.org/result.do?resultId=507404 no verification, not possible with this speed

http://www.hwbot.org/result.do?resultId=505997 wrong verification, not possible with this speed

http://www.hwbot.org/result.do?resultId=504946 no verification, not possible with this speed

http://www.hwbot.org/result.do?resultId=504387 no verification, not possible with this speed

http://www.hwbot.org/result.do?resultId=504456 no verification, not possible with this speed

http://www.hwbot.org/result.do?resultId=727436 verification link to forum post = Ultra D = 939

http://www.hwbot.org/result.do?resultId=505245 no verification

http://www.hwbot.org/result.do?resultId=506003 no verification, not possible with this speed

http://www.hwbot.org/result.do?resultId=504279 wrong verification, A64 DTR 3000+@ 2.783ghz = mobile 3000+

http://www.hwbot.org/result.do?resultId=554687 no verification

http://www.hwbot.org/result.do?resultId=504529 no verification

http://www.hwbot.org/result.do?resultId=527638 no verification, not possible with 2575MHz

http://www.hwbot.org/result.do?resultId=506082 no verification, not possible with 2610MHz

Link to comment
Share on other sites

check the dates on those scores please.


He's quite correct about some of the performance products being a "bit" too good for single channel setups of this kind. Deleting them is perhaps wrong, but they need to be moved to the corresponding 939 category.


http://www.hwbot.org/result.do?resultId=527638 84563

http://www.hwbot.org/result.do?resultId=506003 84480

http://www.hwbot.org/result.do?resultId=504456 86064. but a8n-e is a 939 mobo so no 754 result ;)

http://www.hwbot.org/result.do?resultId=511146 84750


These are the sub 86k ones I found in OP's list, but I have a feeling that the "limit" of s754 is alot higher than that. Just need to test some more before I conclude, my 90k runs were not very optimized:p


Performance products are quite handy in situastions like this, but I hope there is enough knowledge in the crew about K8 that they see that these PP's are jsut as bad as a 42k PP would be on an E8600, and therefore need to be moved;)

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • 2 weeks later...

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

  • Create New...