Hi,

 

there are many sockel 939 results in the sockel 754 category of this cpu in Superpi.

 

I have reported some results 2 times but nothing changed, for now i cant report this results because of moderated by hwbot crew.

 

http://www.hwbot.org/listResults.do?cpuModelId=251&applicationId=3&filterUser=true&filterBlocked=true&limit=100

 

most of the results have'nt any verification.

 

http://www.hwbot.org/result.do?resultId=506883 no verification

 

http://www.hwbot.org/result.do?resultId=719498 2nd place, verification = link to forum post = sockel 939 Winchester

 

http://www.hwbot.org/result.do?resultId=525888 no verification

http://www.hwbot.org/result.do?resultId=511146 wrong verification, not possible with this speed

http://www.hwbot.org/result.do?resultId=504201 wrong verification, Description: A64 Mobile DTR 3000+ 2808MHz...

http://www.hwbot.org/result.do?resultId=507404 no verification, not possible with this speed

http://www.hwbot.org/result.do?resultId=505997 wrong verification, not possible with this speed

http://www.hwbot.org/result.do?resultId=504946 no verification, not possible with this speed

http://www.hwbot.org/result.do?resultId=504387 no verification, not possible with this speed

http://www.hwbot.org/result.do?resultId=504456 no verification, not possible with this speed

http://www.hwbot.org/result.do?resultId=727436 verification link to forum post = Ultra D = 939

http://www.hwbot.org/result.do?resultId=505245 no verification

http://www.hwbot.org/result.do?resultId=506003 no verification, not possible with this speed

http://www.hwbot.org/result.do?resultId=504279 wrong verification, A64 DTR 3000+@ 2.783ghz = mobile 3000+

http://www.hwbot.org/result.do?resultId=554687 no verification

http://www.hwbot.org/result.do?resultId=504529 no verification

http://www.hwbot.org/result.do?resultId=527638 no verification, not possible with 2575MHz

http://www.hwbot.org/result.do?resultId=506082 no verification, not possible with 2610MHz

check the dates on those scores please.

 

He's quite correct about some of the performance products being a "bit" too good for single channel setups of this kind. Deleting them is perhaps wrong, but they need to be moved to the corresponding 939 category.

 

http://www.hwbot.org/result.do?resultId=527638 84563

http://www.hwbot.org/result.do?resultId=506003 84480

http://www.hwbot.org/result.do?resultId=504456 86064. but a8n-e is a 939 mobo so no 754 result

http://www.hwbot.org/result.do?resultId=511146 84750

 

These are the sub 86k ones I found in OP's list, but I have a feeling that the "limit" of s754 is alot higher than that. Just need to test some more before I conclude, my 90k runs were not very optimized:p

 

Performance products are quite handy in situastions like this, but I hope there is enough knowledge in the crew about K8 that they see that these PP's are jsut as bad as a 42k PP would be on an E8600, and therefore need to be moved;)

I don't deny there might be some incorrect HW matches, but checking the data on submissions is important too

 

I agree to that. But your post looked a bit as if you were thinking all of them looked reasonable for the CPU type/speed, which is why I started talking about PP.

Some real S754 3000+ for compare:

 

30.000s http://www.hwbot.org/result.do?resultId=506810 3GHz

31.719s http://www.hwbot.org/result.do?resultId=562698 2,94GHz

33,641s http://www.hwbot.org/result.do?resultId=826332 2,75GHz full optimized sub timings

 

regards

http://www.hwbot.org/result.do?resultId=719498

 

this one should be moved to sockel 939 winchester.

 

And please take a look on all links in my first post.