OBR Posted April 19, 2011 Share Posted April 19, 2011 (edited) Box Box Accessories ... Board angled Board angled Board angled Front view Backside Front panel connectors SATA 3G+6G Mems slots CPU area Back panel PCI-E slots SB heatsink NB+VRM heatsink BIOS switch + Additional ATX Power 1 SB SATA 6G driver Marvell Two BIOSes Next ATX Power 2 + Main ATX Buck 2-phase controller for Mems Mems VRM - 2 analogue phases TrenchMOS mosfets Vishay NB VRM - 2 analogue phases TrenchMOS mosfets Vishay Display driver Nuvoton and display Measuring points, Reset switch Buttons PWM Frequency switches, max is 1000 kHz, Reset CMOS button 6-phase Intersil Buck controller for CPU. CPU VRM has 12 mosfets (phases), divided by Vishay freq dividers to 6-phases on Intersil ... 12x DrMOS Vishay Vishay SiC769CD, Renesas has more better characteristics ... LAN chip cheap USB 3.0 EtronTech Uncore VRM - 3 analogue phases, controlled by 2-fase Intersil Buck controller Intersil ISL6312 - Two phases Buck ICS Clock Super I/O Realtek audio Freq/phase divider Vishay ... on back of PCB Edited April 20, 2011 by OBR Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
OBR Posted April 19, 2011 Author Share Posted April 19, 2011 (edited) BIOS Edited April 20, 2011 by OBR Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
OBR Posted April 20, 2011 Author Share Posted April 20, 2011 (edited) 400 KHz, idle VCore - LoadLine OFF 800 KHz, idle VCore - LoadlIne LVL2 800 kHz, LoadLine ON - Cinebench xCPU DDR3 - 1.7V Load This VRM is tuned extremely great! Max ripple at any load was +/- 50mV which is really great result ... Edited April 23, 2011 by OBR Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
OBR Posted April 20, 2011 Author Share Posted April 20, 2011 First impressions: solid board, 222 BCLK on Air with pretty old C0 Core i7-920 set directly from BIOS to OS and SuperPi 32M ... later will test with Core i7-990X and some cheapest Xeon under LN2 ... BCLK Buttons really works, but not with higher BCLK then 220 MHz ... maybe problem of old bios? Problems: Plastic pins on VRM heatsink - bad contact with mosfets! Plastic pins on High-end board? No actual Voltage readings in BIOS ... Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Massman Posted April 20, 2011 Share Posted April 20, 2011 What BIOS are you on? Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
OBR Posted April 20, 2011 Author Share Posted April 20, 2011 014 - 16/03/2011? Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Hondacity Posted April 20, 2011 Share Posted April 20, 2011 Problems: Plastic pins on VRM heatsink - bad contact with mosfets! Plastic pins on High-end board? No actual Voltage readings in BIOS ... Pics of plastic pins? no actual voltage also on p67a-ud4 lol Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
SF3D Posted April 20, 2011 Share Posted April 20, 2011 Pics of plastic pins? There is multiple pictures about those white plastic pins in the first post Thanks for posting OBR! Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
chew* Posted April 20, 2011 Share Posted April 20, 2011 (edited) BCLK Buttons really works, but not with higher BCLK then 220 MHz ... maybe problem of old bios? Had board up to 253 with buttons.........also did a you tube of bclking on the fly in 3d to show limits of 3d benching at 234/235. 014 bios. Edited April 20, 2011 by chew* Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
OBR Posted April 21, 2011 Author Share Posted April 21, 2011 ive played with only one hour, have to test today better, btw what is your PCI-E for that high BCLK? Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
chew* Posted April 21, 2011 Share Posted April 21, 2011 (edited) ive played with only one hour, have to test today better, btw what is your PCI-E for that high BCLK? Board seems to like 112. Tested with 3 bloomfields to 248 @ 112, high limit seems like 120 hard drive dependant, needed for 250+ if you are booting these speeds like I am. Edited April 21, 2011 by chew* Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
OBR Posted April 21, 2011 Author Share Posted April 21, 2011 better now, but which disk are you using? With my SSD it seems as a max ... Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
chew* Posted April 21, 2011 Share Posted April 21, 2011 mechanical WD's. Gonna have to drop to slow mode soon 1 or 2 bclk more. Won't effect 2d. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
OBR Posted April 23, 2011 Author Share Posted April 23, 2011 look at this video: Strange BLCK fluctuation ... BTW. Oscilograph screens added ... Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
TaPaKaH Posted April 23, 2011 Share Posted April 23, 2011 this makes such a nice base for lots of marketing CPU-Z validations Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
chew* Posted April 23, 2011 Share Posted April 23, 2011 this makes such a nice base for lots of marketing CPU-Z validations True but that is common for 920's at an unstable QPI or uncore........ I can do same on an asus with a clarkdale and have........ It's up to the overclocker if he chooses to submit a bugged result. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Hondacity Posted April 23, 2011 Share Posted April 23, 2011 look at this video: Strange BLCK fluctuation ... BTW. Oscilograph screens added ... GIGABUTT stability there LOL... thanks obr Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Hondacity Posted April 23, 2011 Share Posted April 23, 2011 There is multiple pictures about those white plastic pins in the first post Thanks for posting OBR! ok just saw the two plastic pins... i guess thats hicookie's choice? or gigabutt's? lmao Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
OBR Posted April 23, 2011 Author Share Posted April 23, 2011 (edited) Its not bug with wrong BCLK only in Cpuz, but this BCLK fluctuation is REAL! Look ... BCLK was 235 x 21! ! ! Real screenshot: Bugged screenshot: Result is higher, BCLK has to be a 235! but is higher for real ... not only in Cpuz ... Something is wrong with that OC controller on board ... this CPU under air, cannot to reach 262 BCLK and 5,2 GHz Edited April 23, 2011 by OBR Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
chew* Posted April 23, 2011 Share Posted April 23, 2011 Its not bug with wrong BCLK only in Cpuz, but this BCLK fluctuation is REAL! Look ... BCLK was 235 x 21! ! ! Real screenshot: Bugged screenshot: Result is higher, BCLK has to be a 235! but is higher for real ... not only in Cpuz ... Something is wrong with that OC controller on board ... this CPU under air, cannot to reach 262 BCLK and 5,2 GHz Doubt the speed is actually higher, just because Aida thinks it higher and scores better doesn't mean its actual. We have seen similar trends with other benches. maxmem for instance can be exploited by raising AMD's NB multi in windows.........but the reality is it actually can not be raised. However the benchmark still reflects higher scores becasue it thinks the clocks are higher. My guess is certain benches can be impacted and certian ones can't. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
SoF Posted April 27, 2011 Share Posted April 27, 2011 that bclk problem is as old as x58 - happens on any board around the bclk limits... Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
dinos22 Posted April 28, 2011 Share Posted April 28, 2011 ive seen this behaviour on just about every X58 board i tested, asus, evga, gigabyte etc etc. As SoF said no news there X58 chipset going wild a little when at the limit Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
xxbassplayerxx Posted April 28, 2011 Share Posted April 28, 2011 Yep. I demonstrated this on my RIIIE. It happens when the board reaches its QPI limits: Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
sin0822 Posted April 29, 2011 Share Posted April 29, 2011 (edited) funny you can still validate lol, i can't believe you thought i hit 276 lol. I hear that the bug is a bug yes, but its for real i actually hit 276blck for a few milliseconds and then done. But its not something i will submit as i feel it is partly cheating. I have seen this happen on other non GB X58 boards in other threads, make you question some of these insane high blcks even with minor testing. Anyways i feel as though this board is built for gulftown much more than bloomfield. i like the plastic pushpins, easier to keep track of, my contact to MSOFETs were fine. Edited April 29, 2011 by sin0822 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Join the conversation
You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.