Why was this score removed from the competition ?

Result is now visible , but still not in Team Cup

https://hwbot.org/benchmarks/hwbot_x265_benchmark_-_1080p/submissions/5896164

?

It's even not valid for regular ranking as the Memory tab is empty

25 minutes ago, Leeghoofd said:

It's even not valid for regular ranking as the Memory tab is empty

All required elements are there.
You asked for CPU-Z tabs of CPU, Memory and Motherboard.

I have all the tabs open.

Not my fault if cpu-z has problems with certain motherboards or platforms.

Why X265 Benchmark reads all clocks ... and cpu-z does not ?
Memory tab is empty for clock and timings in cpu-z.

But,all system specs and clocks are there , on the picture. (thanks to X265).

Besides , this is a score that no one would challenge , cause it's almost stock.

Compo rules:

CPU-Z versions from 2.13 or newer, on older problematic platforms older CPU-Zversions are allowed

Works fine on 2.15: https://hwbot.org/benchmarks/hwbot_x265_benchmark_-_1080p/submissions/5685555

it's not more than just open a tab, than I would avoid all detection if there should be nothing listed lol, CPUZ would open lightning fast
You should know better, but something changed somehow

case closed

4 hours ago, Leeghoofd said:

Compo rules:

CPU-Z versions from 2.13 or newer, on older problematic platforms older CPU-Zversions are allowed

Works fine on 2.15: https://hwbot.org/benchmarks/hwbot_x265_benchmark_-_1080p/submissions/5685555

it's not more than just open a tab, than I would avoid all detection if there should be nothing listed lol, CPUZ would open lightning fast
You should know better, but something changed somehow

case closed

I see version 2.08 used in the link you provided not 2.15

I assure you , i didn't adjust any cpu-z setting.
It was run in default state.

These are the rules of the benchmark
https://hwbot.org/benchmarks/hwbot_x265_benchmark_-_1080p/rules/5245

These are the rules of the TC
https://hwbot.org/competitions/HWBOT%20Team%20Cup%202025

I did nothing wrong either way.
To be more accurate i don't see any kind of mention in the rules about cpu-z hardware detection problems (even the partial ones , like in my case).
You should add , for future use.

I repeat myself , i provided what was asked for open cpu-z tabs and it's not my fault , if the latest (at that time) cpu-z version was partialy working in my system.

You have a proper and verified hardware detection by the software used , and it's on the screenshot.
You have the cpu type used with clocks , multi and fsb
You have the memory type used with clocks and size
You have the motherboard type used and bios version
You have the operating system used
You have HPET enabled
You have a very normal score for the clocks

.... and you decide to pull this result out of the competition , for what ???

Sorry but i cannot accept your point of view.

Case open.

Well we agree to disagree, nothing more to add, No need to accept my or any moderator's point of view


Once more rules stated for the TC 2025 compo: (they overrule as always standard HWBot rules so no need to bring those up, pure waste of time)


CPU-Z versions from 2.13 or newer, on older problematic platforms older CPU-Z versions are allowed

No clue how one could misinterpret the BOLD rule addition.

Nevertheless you have been a loooong time bencher, you should know better as scores have been pulled for minor details like not showing the benchmark version, covering the CPU-Z version, no windows time,...



It's quite simple you don't have mem timings readout, Did you try CPU-Z 2.15 or older?


This sub for TC 2025 has proper readouts for the same motherboard for the chipset and mem timings on CPU-Z 2.15

https://hwbot.org/benchmarks/hwbot_x265_benchmark_-_1080p/submissions/5876792


And now the thread is locked and your sub is pulled. Hope you reached your objectives now.