removed

Edited February 13Feb 13 by 44rtie
It was stupid remark, which i made for other reasons and conclusions, had a really bad week with other issues which made do it, didn't know the comments were connected with the forum, just noticed a way to correct this, my bad!

Salty ( moderator 3D) gaaat je PM'n

Sorry; ik heb iets te snel een conclusie getrokken. Het is weer eens mother nature (DX9) wat bij deze versie een rare score gaf (dat had ik een half jaar geleden ook al eens), komt dat bij anderen ook vaker voor bij deze?

Het is 2e keer binnen een paar dagen zodoende

5 hours ago, 44rtie said:

Het is 2e keer binnen een paar dagen zodoende

check your DM's at Discord plz

5 hours ago, 44rtie said:

Sorry; ik heb iets te snel een conclusie getrokken. Het is weer eens mother nature (DX9) wat bij deze versie een rare score gaf (dat had ik een half jaar geleden ook al eens), komt dat bij anderen ook vaker voor bij deze?

when you're on the edge of stability this happens very often with 3dmark03 nature test.

19 hours ago, 44rtie said:

Sorry; ik heb iets te snel een conclusie getrokken. Het is weer eens mother nature (DX9) wat bij deze versie een rare score gaf (dat had ik een half jaar geleden ook al eens), komt dat bij anderen ook vaker voor bij deze?

19 hours ago, 44rtie said:

Het is 2e keer binnen een paar dagen zodoende

You could have spotted it yourself , that those scores (149438 and 150524) were bugged.

A few days earlier you uploaded this
https://hwbot.org/benchmarks/3dmark03/submissions/5963293

So , with common sense only , a few mhz more on core and mem , wouldn't have given you a +49000 score.

Also keep in mind that it's not logical to have a GT4 score higher than GT1 ... and unfortunately you have more bugged 2k3 scores in your profile.
Check them your self.

13 hours ago, saltycroissant said:

when you're on the edge of stability this happens very often with 3dmark03 nature test.

or maybe the 3D moderator should have a check

On 2/1/2026 at 10:20 AM, TASOS said:

You could have spotted it yourself , that those scores (149438 and 150524) were bugged.

A few days earlier you uploaded this
https://hwbot.org/benchmarks/3dmark03/submissions/5963293

So , with common sense only , a few mhz more on core and mem , wouldn't have given you a +49000 score.

Also keep in mind that it's not logical to have a GT4 score higher than GT1 ... and unfortunately you have more bugged 2k3 scores in your profile.
Check them your self.

or maybe the 3D moderator should have a check

Tasos, you're right looking to it afterwards which is easy (should make spreadsheets with my score and such, to improve my scores and find out `hick ups).
I gave the card a service with some improvements, so I did another set of runs, I did not look at the previous scores that closely to have notice the big differences.
My guess was if it's valid on 3DMark why it shouldn't be valid, of course it could be a glitch one time but a few days later i had even little better result, looking closer I get why maybe it was way too high.
Inspected the detailed scores after Salty's remarks and found out where the bench went wrong, one had a very high score in mother nature and the other had a high score at Trolls liar which caused the high total score, it happend a half year before and at that time i personally didn't totally agree with the removal.
I've joined 1,5 year ago and have done quite a few benches so I have some experience and I love participating over here but know little of the inner workings of the benches, if it sticks to wall maybe I am doing something good, I do it for fun and the geeky learning curve.
I've been totally transparant most of the times when I make my screenshots (with more than enough system information), I even add the detailed scores even when it's not necessary, I got nothing to hide even when I'm maybe stupid with my settings or such.
LIke i told Salty; If the score wasn't the number one position no one had noticed it including me had noticed it.
The scores weren't correct and I will be on my guard with the 3DMark 03 next time, my bad!

Enjoy your weekend, Aart

14 hours ago, 44rtie said:

Tasos, you're right looking to it afterwards which is easy (should make spreadsheets with my score and such, to improve my scores and find out `hick ups).
I gave the card a service with some improvements, so I did another set of runs, I did not look at the previous scores that closely to have notice the big differences.
My guess was if it's valid on 3DMark why it shouldn't be valid, of course it could be a glitch one time but a few days later i had even little better result, looking closer I get why maybe it was way too high.
Inspected the detailed scores after Salty's remarks and found out where the bench went wrong, one had a very high score in mother nature and the other had a high score at Trolls liar which caused the high total score, it happend a half year before and at that time i personally didn't totally agree with the removal.
I've joined 1,5 year ago and have done quite a few benches so I have some experience and I love participating over here but know little of the inner workings of the benches, if it sticks to wall maybe I am doing something good, I do it for fun and the geeky learning curve.
I've been totally transparant most of the times when I make my screenshots (with more than enough system information), I even add the detailed scores even when it's not necessary, I got nothing to hide even when I'm maybe stupid with my settings or such.
LIke i told Salty; If the score wasn't the number one position no one had noticed it including me had noticed it.
The scores weren't correct and I will be on my guard with the 3DMark 03 next time, my bad!

Enjoy your weekend, Aart

It can happen to anyone.
Nobody is infallible.

The 2k3 is very "sneaky" cause it tends to produce bugged scores when you are benching on the edge of stability.
It's easy to make a mistake when subbing results ... for whatever reason.

What matters (in here) at the end of the day , is to have positive attitude , good intention and honesty.
I think you have them all.