Jump to content
HWBOT Community Forums

TPP. This goes against the principle of encouraging benching


K404
 Share

Recommended Posts

#2 Is the only one that makes sense to me, if all globals for a particular bench can contribute to your personal rankings then it should be the same from a team standpoint, if one person is a pcmark specialist and that's all they want to bench then let them. I think that was a step forward in rev4, if you/your team dominates a benchmark you should get full points.

 

#3 is basically what we wanted to avoid and #1 puts even more weight on that one person.

 

I definitely don't think the way to solve a problem with an overcomplicated system is to make it more complicated with option 3.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

i'd say #2 fits best, as that way a team can set an strategy like member "x" focus on a determinate hardware and member "y" on another different one

 

#1 seems like too much depending on just one person and kinda hurts what a team effort should meant to be in my opinion (as for TPP)

 

#3 seems quite difficult either to implement and to follow for us members , we should know exactly how TPP are affecting in each category/ranking/benchmark and it'd be real hard knowing when to tick or untick the checkbox

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I don't think large majority of people will spend the time to understand option #3. And if they did it would be a lot of work to check an entire teams scores to maximize points.

 

#2 is the best option if I understand it correctly. Its a team competition so the best team score for any hardware should always count. Even if the same user is generating the points.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I suggest create a new thread with a poll in it :)

 

I'm all in for either options #1 and #2.

Option #3 makes sense too, but it would take a lot of effort for teams to analyse TPP global ranks and their scores and get the best out of them ... this takes time, and I'd rather see people spend their time on benching :)

Link to comment
Share on other sites

#2 Is the only one that makes sense to me, if all globals for a particular bench can contribute to your personal rankings then it should be the same from a team standpoint, if one person is a pcmark specialist and that's all they want to bench then let them. I think that was a step forward in rev4, if you/your team dominates a benchmark you should get full points.

 

#3 is basically what we wanted to avoid and #1 puts even more weight on that one person.

 

I definitely don't think the way to solve a problem with an overcomplicated system is to make it more complicated with option 3.

 

i'd say #2 fits best, as that way a team can set an strategy like member "x" focus on a determinate hardware and member "y" on another different one

 

#1 seems like too much depending on just one person and kinda hurts what a team effort should meant to be in my opinion (as for TPP)

 

#3 seems quite difficult either to implement and to follow for us members , we should know exactly how TPP are affecting in each category/ranking/benchmark and it'd be real hard knowing when to tick or untick the checkbox

 

I agree with both of these :)

 

#2 is the way to go!

 

 

EDIT: C-c-c-c combo breaker!

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • 2 weeks later...
  • 3 months later...

Did anything happen? Take 3D05 on 1x GPU.

 

http://hwbot.org/benchmark/3dmark05/#cores=1|interval=50|rankBy=teams

 

PURE has the top 2 TPPGL with a 3D05+1x480 and 3D05+1x580 (made by different people).

Is it changed now so that if one person on their own has the best 480 and best 580 scores, both count for the team?

Edited by borandi
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

 Share

×
×
  • Create New...