August 16, 201114 yr Nice clocks man. But very bad performance. No need to be so harsh...no one has 100% perfect results
August 16, 201114 yr No need to be so harsh...no one has 100% perfect results Its not a harsh) It way to continue)
August 17, 201114 yr Nice score! Efficiency is overrated anyway, if your score is high you got what you need:D I'd rather have 45.1k at high clocks than 44.7k at low clocks.
August 17, 201114 yr Nice score! Efficiency is overrated anyway, if your score is high you got what you need:D I'd rather have 45.1k at high clocks than 44.7k at low clocks. Lol. Is this Knut speaking or Andre?
August 17, 201114 yr Lol. Is this Knut speaking or Andre? It's "me" i'm serious enough, this is not efficiency-bot, we do this for the SCORES, not the efficiency. Usually you need both, but not always:)
August 17, 201114 yr Nice score! Efficiency is overrated anyway, if your score is high you got what you need:D I'd rather have 45.1k at high clocks than 44.7k at low clocks. +1 Higher OC, and a better score = Win! Well done Suicide
Join the conversation
You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.