Nosfer@tu Posted October 30, 2011 Posted October 30, 2011 This score was removed because its a impossible score. http://hwbot.org/submission/2176546_noxon_memory_clock_ddr2_sdram_739.8_mhz Maybe the devider is broken, but come on. Then remove every single score. 3½ years later a moderator starts cleaning Quote
Christian Ney Posted October 30, 2011 Posted October 30, 2011 Well, the divider was already bugged in 2008, and this submission has been reported time ago and again onother time today Quote
knopflerbruce Posted October 30, 2011 Posted October 30, 2011 So if it's indeed bugged in some way, we have to let it stay because it's old? C'mon:D Bugged is bugged, 1 day old or 4 years. Quote
Crew Don_Dan Posted October 31, 2011 Crew Posted October 31, 2011 This score was made in August 2008, exactly around the time when this thread was posted. However, your score was submitted to HWbot not even 5 months ago... They WILL remove every score made with the 3:5 divider cause I'm reporting them when I see them. Quote
Nosfer@tu Posted November 3, 2011 Author Posted November 3, 2011 Well, the divider was already bugged in 2008, and this submission has been reported time ago and again onother time today My problem is, when 1 score is removed for the bug, remove the rest to. If not it seams like selecting scores for removal. So if it's indeed bugged in some way, we have to let it stay because it's old? C'mon:D Bugged is bugged, 1 day old or 4 years. Then remove all DDR2 with bugged devider If only 1 is removed, it is like saying the OC was easy This score was made in August 2008, exactly around the time when this thread was posted. However, your score was submitted to HWbot not even 5 months ago... They WILL remove every score made with the 3:5 divider cause I'm reporting them when I see them. Its not mine Don_Dan Im Nosfer@tu not Noxon I dident know the score was submitted 5 months ago, that makes it a bit different I agree Quote
Christian Ney Posted November 3, 2011 Posted November 3, 2011 Then remove all DDR2 with bugged devider We do Quote
Crew Sweet Posted November 4, 2011 Crew Posted November 4, 2011 (edited) http://hwbot.org/submission/1061533_kawaboy51_memory_clock_ddr2_sdram_816.7_mhz http://hwbot.org/submission/2166112_bartolomius_memory_clock_ddr2_sdram_725_mhz http://hwbot.org/submission/1040184_xt0m_memory_clock_ddr2_sdram_720_mhz Thats correct 720 Mhz Same problem (bugged 3:5)...blocked Edited November 4, 2011 by Sweet Quote
t0mz0r Posted November 4, 2011 Posted November 4, 2011 So now you blocked an entry even tho you actually corrected it about a year ago? Well done. Not selective at all. No biggie as no points are involved but hey. Still. Quote
Crew Sweet Posted November 4, 2011 Crew Posted November 4, 2011 So now you blocked an entry even tho you actually corrected it about a year ago? Well done. Not selective at all. No biggie as no points are involved but hey. Still. Sorry xt0m, you are right, 720 Mhz is correct my fault Quote
Crew Don_Dan Posted November 4, 2011 Crew Posted November 4, 2011 Its not mine Don_Dan Im Nosfer@tu not Noxon I dident know the score was submitted 5 months ago, that makes it a bit different I agree I'm sorry for mixing you guys up. Can the mods please add a note on the memory frequency rules page that 3:5 is not accepted? And instead of blocking, just calculate the correct memory speed ( 2:3 divider ) and modify the entries. Quote
Crew Sweet Posted November 4, 2011 Crew Posted November 4, 2011 (edited) http://hwbot.org/submission/1061533_kawaboy51_memory_clock_ddr2_sdram_816.7_mhz Cant fix it http://hwbot.org/submission/2166112_bartolomius_memory_clock_ddr2_sdram_725_mhz (fixed) http://hwbot.org/submission/1040184_xt0m_memory_clock_ddr2_sdram_720_mhz Thats is correct 720 Mhz (fixed) Same problem (bugged 3:5)...blocked I dont know why ....besides could be many more bugged divisor, only sometimes can be fix and others not. Edited November 4, 2011 by Sweet Quote
Crew Sweet Posted November 24, 2011 Crew Posted November 24, 2011 Done Kenny, forget this, Thanks Quote
K404 Posted November 24, 2011 Posted November 24, 2011 Thanks bro. Oh..... he submitted it 3 times these results took the place of the deleted one: http://hwbot.org/submission/1061530_kawaboy51_memory_clock_ddr2_sdram_816.7_mhz http://hwbot.org/submission/1061532_kawaboy51_memory_clock_ddr2_sdram_816.7_mhz Quote
Crew Sweet Posted November 24, 2011 Crew Posted November 24, 2011 Thanks bro. Oh..... he submitted it 3 times these results took the place of the deleted one: http://hwbot.org/submission/1061530_kawaboy51_memory_clock_ddr2_sdram_816.7_mhz http://hwbot.org/submission/1061532_kawaboy51_memory_clock_ddr2_sdram_816.7_mhz Yes now fix that. thanks Quote
basco Posted May 21, 2012 Posted May 21, 2012 (edited) so can someone tell me if this is correct. dont know when is bugged or not? thanks in advance. finally found a good ramclocking mobo. Edited May 21, 2012 by basco Quote
Crew Don_Dan Posted May 22, 2012 Crew Posted May 22, 2012 As I said on HWLuxx, if you're using the 3:5 divider on the 400 strap it's only 2:3 in reality. Quote
Recommended Posts
Join the conversation
You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.