Jump to content
HWBOT Community Forums

Testing 45x Core i7 3930K (C2) ...


Recommended Posts

Yah, tried them on

 

- R4E 1004 bios

- R4E 1101 bios

- Xpower2 1.2b1 bios

 

This particular chip is rebooting all the way upto 57x, stops rebooting at 5843 or so. But no way in hell it'll load OS over 5250MHz. Other chips are behaving similarly (booting all over the place).

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Yah, tried them on

 

- R4E 1004 bios

- R4E 1101 bios

- Xpower2 1.2b1 bios

 

This particular chip is rebooting all the way upto 57x, stops rebooting at 5843 or so. But no way in hell it'll load OS over 5250MHz. Other chips are behaving similarly (booting all over the place).

 

So it looks like those chips were worse than average. You should try to find cpu with highest temps. My 3930K is pretty hot one, so it might be high leakage chip.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Alright, more cross-testing results. Seems like 3/5 57x chips were false positives: they rebooted to 57x in the office, but when re-testing at home they did ~53x. One chip is doing 5500 6x12t and 5610 2c, which is in line with Viss' findings that there seems to be a large variance between max frequency depending on the amount of cores you've enabled. Truth be told, this comes as a suprise to me as, just like Hiwa, I found most SBE chips to be quite balanced (similar to SB). I assume it comes down to particular chips as the 4 others are behaving quite consistent (hitting the same frequency on 2c or on 6c).

 

One of the chips is a truely interesting chip. This one could reboot all the way upto 5843MHz in the office (tested multiple times) and seems to reboot at 57x here at home as well. When cooling down the chip, however, the reboot process gets a lot more complication. Here's what I found:

 

- 5100MHz, 6c12t, +21°C => OS

- 5300MHz, 6c12t, +8°C => OS

- 5500MHz, 6c12t, +3°C => reboot, but no OS

- 5500MHz, 6c12t, -7°C => no reboot!

- 5500MHz, 2c2t, -15°C => reboot, but no OS

 

It's the first Sandy Bridge(-E) I've seen behave like this. Really odd.

 

Today's tests were on the XPower-II, which seemed to give more accurate results than the R4E I tested before. Not higher OC results, just more accurate following the method. This weekend, I'll re-try the method on the R4E to do another cross-check.

 

Disappointing for sure ... but interesting nonetheless.

  • Thanks 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

5540 6c chip -50 LN2 if u want call it good one, chip hates cold when SS it's good for 57XX but validation and 2 cores, when ln2 lower than -20 or so chip can't boot higher than 5540 (2c 6c same)

 

PS better wait new batchs or IVY, don't waste money on C2

Edited by Hiwa
Link to comment
Share on other sites

5540 6c chip -50 LN2 if u want call it good one, chip hates cold when SS it's good for 57XX but validation and 2 cores, when ln2 lower than -20 or so chip can't boot higher than 5540 (2c 6c same)

 

PS better wait new batchs or IVY, don't waste money on C2

 

 

ahh I see, makes me glad I kept my C1, hopefully Ivy does not get delayed, here's hoping to an actual product launch on March 6.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

×
×
  • Create New...