Rev3 Up and Running - Complaints, Ideas, Ramblings, Comments ... but no bugs

[riska]

yea maybe but not realy is there you dont get the reconition with this scores you suppose to have i will gladly se any one top my score with the same cards it took me months to get that score

[riska]

argh forget it !!! it sucks leave it be..

[Antinomy]

RB, Massman and JMKE - go to bed, guys!

We don't need the crew dead, it's not what this thread and the new rev. is about. I hope you'll be sleeping for more than 12 hours a be fresh then.

And close this thread for that time or it'll grow over hundred pages )))

 

Happy New Year!

[Bartmasta]

like people said the gap is too big

 

first 1,5 points ok fine

2nd 1,2 points ok

and the 3rd suddenly gets 0,1?

 

so 2nd place takes work but 3rd is no effort at all?

 

and if you say well then try to get 2nd place well too bad i dont have i7 sorry

[Aleslammer]

Happy New Year To All

 

Like the setup and seeing some good opportunities with some of my older hardware at present, frustrated by taking a big hit on my HW points and my shinny new 3550 is going to need a pot if I want more than .7 HW points, but hell it could of been worse. Happy cause I can spend vid card money on other needed hardware.

 

Small Prob, my PCMark 05 scores are pointed at each other, so one is not coming up in my user points.

http://hwbot.org/listResults.do?userId=19466&applicationId=9

 

I've points from opening a hardware category, why do you give points for this seems like you need two to compete.

 

And finally is there gong to be a achievement award for the first gal/guy making it to 300 HW points .1 point at time, if this has been addressed, sorry.

 

Ale

[Turrican]

got a question here:

 

how can i see the ranking for the "2x cpu category" in pcmark and wprime. i can't find it.

example: http://www.hwbot.org/hardware/processor/pentium_3_800mhz

[Warrior_oF_Byte]

I've a Question!!!or doubt...

 

In Global Wprime1024 my best result is:

http://hwbot.org/result.do?resultId=845475

wPrime 1024m 8x CPU rank: 80th out of 123, good for 0.9 points.

wPrime 1024m 2x Xeon E7320 rank: 1st out of 1, good for 1.5 points.

 

But in the other hand also i have this other:

http://hwbot.org/result.do?resultId=895933

wPrime 1024m 1x CPU rank: not Warrior_oF_Byte's best wPrime 1024m submission, only best is ranked.

wPrime 1024m Sempron 140 rank: 11th out of 15, good for 0.1 points.

 

But this result is behind this :

http://hwbot.org/result.do?resultId=810324 (Jn_Freeman's)

wPrime 1024m 1x CPU rank: 39th out of thousands, good for 6.6 points.

wPrime 1024m Celeron LGA775 430 rank: 14th out of 33, good for 0.5 points.

 

So, what's it's better? being 80th of 8x or being 40th of 1x?

Would you change the best wprime subimission for the best position in a rank?

For me it's better being in a higher rank than having a higher result. It's more rewarding in that way.

[packet]

Hey packet, you have my old ranking. I used to be in the 530's up until yesterday. Now I'm 1,129! Yea for rev. 3!

 

im new to the game bro lol and defiantly not in a position to complain, rather id prefer to get on with it...just use your skills and try a new approach

 

i know how hard it is to get a score and time spent to get that score

 

when i see a thread like this one i just wanted to add some positives, definitely didn't mean to offend anyone

[Alriin]

HW points distribution after fix:

 

*********** Testing 1
hw rank 1/1: 1.5
*********** Testing 2
hw rank 1/2: 1.5
hw rank 2/2: 0.1
*********** Testing 3
hw rank 1/3: 1.5
hw rank 2/3: 0.1
hw rank 3/3: 0.1
*********** Testing 4
hw rank 1/4: 1.5
hw rank 2/4: 1.2
hw rank 3/4: 0.1
hw rank 4/4: 0.1
*********** Testing 5
hw rank 1/5: 1.5
hw rank 2/5: 1.2
hw rank 3/5: 0.1
hw rank 4/5: 0.1
hw rank 5/5: 0.1
*********** Testing 6
hw rank 1/6: 1.5
hw rank 2/6: 1.2
hw rank 3/6: 0.9
hw rank 4/6: 0.1
hw rank 5/6: 0.1
hw rank 6/6: 0.1
*********** Testing 7
hw rank 1/7: 1.5
hw rank 2/7: 1.2
hw rank 3/7: 0.9
hw rank 4/7: 0.1
hw rank 5/7: 0.1
hw rank 6/7: 0.1
hw rank 7/7: 0.1
*********** Testing 8
hw rank 1/8: 1.5
hw rank 2/8: 1.2
hw rank 3/8: 0.9
hw rank 4/8: 0.6
hw rank 5/8: 0.1
hw rank 6/8: 0.1
hw rank 7/8: 0.1
hw rank 8/8: 0.1
*********** Testing 9
hw rank 1/9: 1.556
hw rank 2/9: 1.2
hw rank 3/9: 0.9
hw rank 4/9: 0.6
hw rank 5/9: 0.1
hw rank 6/9: 0.1
hw rank 7/9: 0.1
hw rank 8/9: 0.1
hw rank 9/9: 0.1
*********** Testing 10
hw rank 1/10: 1.6
hw rank 2/10: 1.2
hw rank 3/10: 0.9
hw rank 4/10: 0.6
hw rank 5/10: 0.3
hw rank 6/10: 0.1
hw rank 7/10: 0.1
hw rank 8/10: 0.1
hw rank 9/10: 0.1
hw rank 10/10: 0.1
*********** Testing 11
hw rank 1/11: 1.8
hw rank 2/11: 1.2
hw rank 3/11: 0.9
hw rank 4/11: 0.6
hw rank 5/11: 0.3
hw rank 6/11: 0.1
hw rank 7/11: 0.1
hw rank 8/11: 0.1
hw rank 9/11: 0.1
hw rank 10/11: 0.1
hw rank 11/11: 0.1
*********** Testing 20
hw rank 1/20: 3.6
hw rank 2/20: 2.56
hw rank 3/20: 1.89
hw rank 4/20: 1.44
hw rank 5/20: 1.1
hw rank 6/20: 0.8
hw rank 7/20: 0.6
hw rank 8/20: 0.4
hw rank 9/20: 0.2
hw rank 10/20: 0.1
hw rank 11/20: 0.1
hw rank 12/20: 0.1
hw rank 13/20: 0.1
hw rank 14/20: 0.1
hw rank 15/20: 0.1
hw rank 16/20: 0.1
hw rank 17/20: 0.1
hw rank 18/20: 0.1
hw rank 19/20: 0.1
hw rank 20/20: 0.1
*********** Testing 30
hw rank 1/30: 5.6
hw rank 2/30: 4.16
hw rank 3/30: 3.24
hw rank 4/30: 2.64
hw rank 5/30: 2.2
hw rank 6/30: 1.8
hw rank 7/30: 1.6
hw rank 8/30: 1.4
hw rank 9/30: 1.2
hw rank 10/30: 1
hw rank 11/30: 0.8
hw rank 12/30: 0.6
hw rank 13/30: 0.4
hw rank 14/30: 0.2
hw rank 15/30: 0.1
hw rank 16/30: 0.1
hw rank 17/30: 0.1
hw rank 18/30: 0.1
hw rank 19/30: 0.1
hw rank 20/30: 0.1
hw rank 21/30: 0.1
hw rank 22/30: 0.1
hw rank 23/30: 0.1
hw rank 24/30: 0.1
hw rank 25/30: 0.1
hw rank 26/30: 0.1
hw rank 27/30: 0.1
hw rank 28/30: 0.1
hw rank 29/30: 0.1
hw rank 30/30: 0.1
*********** Testing 50
hw rank 1/50: 9.6
hw rank 2/50: 7.36
hw rank 3/50: 5.94
hw rank 4/50: 5.04
hw rank 5/50: 4.4
hw rank 6/50: 3.8
hw rank 7/50: 3.6
hw rank 8/50: 3.4
hw rank 9/50: 3.2
hw rank 10/50: 3
hw rank 11/50: 2.8
hw rank 12/50: 2.6
hw rank 13/50: 2.4
hw rank 14/50: 2.2
hw rank 15/50: 2
hw rank 16/50: 1.8
hw rank 17/50: 1.6
hw rank 18/50: 1.4
hw rank 19/50: 1.2
hw rank 20/50: 1
hw rank 21/50: 0.8
hw rank 22/50: 0.6
hw rank 23/50: 0.4
hw rank 24/50: 0.2
hw rank 25/50: 0.1
hw rank 26/50: 0.1
hw rank 27/50: 0.1
hw rank 28/50: 0.1
hw rank 29/50: 0.1
hw rank 30/50: 0.1
hw rank 31/50: 0.1
hw rank 32/50: 0.1
hw rank 33/50: 0.1
hw rank 34/50: 0.1
hw rank 35/50: 0.1
hw rank 36/50: 0.1
hw rank 37/50: 0.1
hw rank 38/50: 0.1
hw rank 39/50: 0.1
hw rank 40/50: 0.1
hw rank 41/50: 0.1
hw rank 42/50: 0.1
hw rank 43/50: 0.1
hw rank 44/50: 0.1
hw rank 45/50: 0.1
hw rank 46/50: 0.1
hw rank 47/50: 0.1
hw rank 48/50: 0.1
hw rank 49/50: 0.1
hw rank 50/50: 0.1
*********** Testing 100
hw rank 1/100: 19.6
hw rank 2/100: 15.36
hw rank 3/100: 12.69
hw rank 4/100: 11.04
hw rank 5/100: 9.9
hw rank 6/100: 8.8
hw rank 7/100: 8.6
hw rank 8/100: 8.4
hw rank 9/100: 8.2
hw rank 10/100: 8
hw rank 11/100: 7.8
hw rank 12/100: 7.6
hw rank 13/100: 7.4
hw rank 14/100: 7.2
hw rank 15/100: 7
hw rank 16/100: 6.8
hw rank 17/100: 6.6
hw rank 18/100: 6.4
hw rank 19/100: 6.2
hw rank 20/100: 6
hw rank 21/100: 5.8
hw rank 22/100: 5.6
hw rank 23/100: 5.4
hw rank 24/100: 5.2
hw rank 25/100: 5
hw rank 26/100: 4.8
hw rank 27/100: 4.6
hw rank 28/100: 4.4
hw rank 29/100: 4.2
hw rank 30/100: 4
hw rank 31/100: 3.8
hw rank 32/100: 3.6
hw rank 33/100: 3.4
hw rank 34/100: 3.2
hw rank 35/100: 3
hw rank 36/100: 2.8
hw rank 37/100: 2.6
hw rank 38/100: 2.4
hw rank 39/100: 2.2
hw rank 40/100: 2
hw rank 41/100: 1.8
hw rank 42/100: 1.6
hw rank 43/100: 1.4
hw rank 44/100: 1.2
hw rank 45/100: 1
hw rank 46/100: 0.8
hw rank 47/100: 0.6
hw rank 48/100: 0.4
hw rank 49/100: 0.2
hw rank 50/100: 0.1
hw rank 51/100: 0.1
hw rank 52/100: 0.1
hw rank 53/100: 0.1
hw rank 54/100: 0.1
hw rank 55/100: 0.1
hw rank 56/100: 0.1
hw rank 57/100: 0.1
hw rank 58/100: 0.1
hw rank 59/100: 0.1
hw rank 60/100: 0.1
hw rank 61/100: 0.1
hw rank 62/100: 0.1
hw rank 63/100: 0.1
hw rank 64/100: 0.1
hw rank 65/100: 0.1
hw rank 66/100: 0.1
hw rank 67/100: 0.1
hw rank 68/100: 0.1
hw rank 69/100: 0.1
hw rank 70/100: 0.1
hw rank 71/100: 0.1
hw rank 72/100: 0.1
hw rank 73/100: 0.1
hw rank 74/100: 0.1
hw rank 75/100: 0.1
hw rank 76/100: 0.1
hw rank 77/100: 0.1
hw rank 78/100: 0.1
hw rank 79/100: 0.1
hw rank 80/100: 0.1
hw rank 81/100: 0.1
hw rank 82/100: 0.1
hw rank 83/100: 0.1
hw rank 84/100: 0.1
hw rank 85/100: 0.1
hw rank 86/100: 0.1
hw rank 87/100: 0.1
hw rank 88/100: 0.1
hw rank 89/100: 0.1
hw rank 90/100: 0.1
hw rank 91/100: 0.1
hw rank 92/100: 0.1
hw rank 93/100: 0.1
hw rank 94/100: 0.1
hw rank 95/100: 0.1
hw rank 96/100: 0.1
hw rank 97/100: 0.1
hw rank 98/100: 0.1
hw rank 99/100: 0.1
hw rank 100/100: 0.1
*********** Testing 400
hw rank 1/400: 49.75
hw rank 2/400: 39.6
hw rank 3/400: 33.244
hw rank 4/400: 29.4
hw rank 5/400: 26.812
hw rank 6/400: 24.25
hw rank 7/400: 24.125
hw rank 8/400: 24
hw rank 9/400: 23.875
hw rank 10/400: 23.75
hw rank 11/400: 23.625
hw rank 12/400: 23.5
hw rank 13/400: 23.375
hw rank 14/400: 23.25
hw rank 15/400: 23.125
hw rank 16/400: 23
hw rank 17/400: 22.875
hw rank 18/400: 22.75
hw rank 19/400: 22.625
hw rank 20/400: 22.5
hw rank 21/400: 22.375
hw rank 22/400: 22.25
hw rank 23/400: 22.125
hw rank 24/400: 22
hw rank 25/400: 21.875
hw rank 26/400: 21.75
hw rank 27/400: 21.625
hw rank 28/400: 21.5
hw rank 29/400: 21.375
hw rank 30/400: 21.25
hw rank 31/400: 21.125
hw rank 32/400: 21
hw rank 33/400: 20.875
hw rank 34/400: 20.75
hw rank 35/400: 20.625
hw rank 36/400: 20.5
hw rank 37/400: 20.375
hw rank 38/400: 20.25
hw rank 39/400: 20.125
hw rank 40/400: 20
hw rank 41/400: 19.875
hw rank 42/400: 19.75
hw rank 43/400: 19.625
hw rank 44/400: 19.5
hw rank 45/400: 19.375
hw rank 46/400: 19.25
hw rank 47/400: 19.125
hw rank 48/400: 19
hw rank 49/400: 18.875
hw rank 50/400: 18.75
hw rank 51/400: 18.625
hw rank 52/400: 18.5
hw rank 53/400: 18.375
hw rank 54/400: 18.25
hw rank 55/400: 18.125
hw rank 56/400: 18
hw rank 57/400: 17.875
hw rank 58/400: 17.75
hw rank 59/400: 17.625
hw rank 60/400: 17.5
hw rank 61/400: 17.375
hw rank 62/400: 17.25
hw rank 63/400: 17.125
hw rank 64/400: 17
hw rank 65/400: 16.875
hw rank 66/400: 16.75
hw rank 67/400: 16.625
hw rank 68/400: 16.5
hw rank 69/400: 16.375
hw rank 70/400: 16.25
hw rank 71/400: 16.125
hw rank 72/400: 16
hw rank 73/400: 15.875
hw rank 74/400: 15.75
hw rank 75/400: 15.625
hw rank 76/400: 15.5
hw rank 77/400: 15.375
hw rank 78/400: 15.25
hw rank 79/400: 15.125
hw rank 80/400: 15
hw rank 81/400: 14.875
hw rank 82/400: 14.75
hw rank 83/400: 14.625
hw rank 84/400: 14.5
hw rank 85/400: 14.375
hw rank 86/400: 14.25
hw rank 87/400: 14.125
hw rank 88/400: 14
hw rank 89/400: 13.875
hw rank 90/400: 13.75
hw rank 91/400: 13.625
hw rank 92/400: 13.5
hw rank 93/400: 13.375
hw rank 94/400: 13.25
hw rank 95/400: 13.125
hw rank 96/400: 13
hw rank 97/400: 12.875
hw rank 98/400: 12.75
hw rank 99/400: 12.625
hw rank 100/400: 12.5
hw rank 101/400: 12.375
hw rank 102/400: 12.25
hw rank 103/400: 12.125
hw rank 104/400: 12
hw rank 105/400: 11.875
hw rank 106/400: 11.75
hw rank 107/400: 11.625
hw rank 108/400: 11.5
hw rank 109/400: 11.375
hw rank 110/400: 11.25
hw rank 111/400: 11.125
hw rank 112/400: 11
hw rank 113/400: 10.875
hw rank 114/400: 10.75
hw rank 115/400: 10.625
hw rank 116/400: 10.5
hw rank 117/400: 10.375
hw rank 118/400: 10.25
hw rank 119/400: 10.125
hw rank 120/400: 10
hw rank 121/400: 9.875
hw rank 122/400: 9.75
hw rank 123/400: 9.625
hw rank 124/400: 9.5
hw rank 125/400: 9.375
hw rank 126/400: 9.25
hw rank 127/400: 9.125
hw rank 128/400: 9
hw rank 129/400: 8.875
hw rank 130/400: 8.75
hw rank 131/400: 8.625
hw rank 132/400: 8.5
hw rank 133/400: 8.375
hw rank 134/400: 8.25
hw rank 135/400: 8.125
hw rank 136/400: 8
hw rank 137/400: 7.875
hw rank 138/400: 7.75
hw rank 139/400: 7.625
hw rank 140/400: 7.5
hw rank 141/400: 7.375
hw rank 142/400: 7.25
hw rank 143/400: 7.125
hw rank 144/400: 7
hw rank 145/400: 6.875
hw rank 146/400: 6.75
hw rank 147/400: 6.625
hw rank 148/400: 6.5
hw rank 149/400: 6.375
hw rank 150/400: 6.25
hw rank 151/400: 6.125
hw rank 152/400: 6
hw rank 153/400: 5.875
hw rank 154/400: 5.75
hw rank 155/400: 5.625
hw rank 156/400: 5.5
hw rank 157/400: 5.375
hw rank 158/400: 5.25
hw rank 159/400: 5.125
hw rank 160/400: 5
hw rank 161/400: 4.875
hw rank 162/400: 4.75
hw rank 163/400: 4.625
hw rank 164/400: 4.5
hw rank 165/400: 4.375
hw rank 166/400: 4.25
hw rank 167/400: 4.125
hw rank 168/400: 4
hw rank 169/400: 3.875
hw rank 170/400: 3.75
hw rank 171/400: 3.625
hw rank 172/400: 3.5
hw rank 173/400: 3.375
hw rank 174/400: 3.25
hw rank 175/400: 3.125
hw rank 176/400: 3
hw rank 177/400: 2.875
hw rank 178/400: 2.75
hw rank 179/400: 2.625
hw rank 180/400: 2.5
hw rank 181/400: 2.375
hw rank 182/400: 2.25
hw rank 183/400: 2.125
hw rank 184/400: 2
hw rank 185/400: 1.875
hw rank 186/400: 1.75
hw rank 187/400: 1.625
hw rank 188/400: 1.5
hw rank 189/400: 1.375
hw rank 190/400: 1.25
hw rank 191/400: 1.125
hw rank 192/400: 1
hw rank 193/400: 0.875
hw rank 194/400: 0.75
hw rank 195/400: 0.625
hw rank 196/400: 0.5
hw rank 197/400: 0.375
hw rank 198/400: 0.25
hw rank 199/400: 0.125
hw rank 200/400: 0.1
hw rank 201/400: 0.1
hw rank 202/400: 0.1
hw rank 203/400: 0.1
hw rank 204/400: 0.1
hw rank 205/400: 0.1
hw rank 206/400: 0.1
hw rank 207/400: 0.1
hw rank 208/400: 0.1
hw rank 209/400: 0.1
hw rank 210/400: 0.1
hw rank 211/400: 0.1
hw rank 212/400: 0.1
hw rank 213/400: 0.1
hw rank 214/400: 0.1
hw rank 215/400: 0.1
hw rank 216/400: 0.1
hw rank 217/400: 0.1
hw rank 218/400: 0.1
hw rank 219/400: 0.1
hw rank 220/400: 0.1
hw rank 221/400: 0.1
hw rank 222/400: 0.1
hw rank 223/400: 0.1
hw rank 224/400: 0.1
hw rank 225/400: 0.1
hw rank 226/400: 0.1
hw rank 227/400: 0.1
hw rank 228/400: 0.1
hw rank 229/400: 0.1
hw rank 230/400: 0.1
hw rank 231/400: 0.1
hw rank 232/400: 0.1
hw rank 233/400: 0.1
hw rank 234/400: 0.1
hw rank 235/400: 0.1
hw rank 236/400: 0.1
hw rank 237/400: 0.1
hw rank 238/400: 0.1
hw rank 239/400: 0.1
hw rank 240/400: 0.1
hw rank 241/400: 0.1
hw rank 242/400: 0.1
hw rank 243/400: 0.1
hw rank 244/400: 0.1
hw rank 245/400: 0.1
hw rank 246/400: 0.1
hw rank 247/400: 0.1
hw rank 248/400: 0.1
hw rank 249/400: 0.1
hw rank 250/400: 0.1
hw rank 251/400: 0.1
hw rank 252/400: 0.1
hw rank 253/400: 0.1
hw rank 254/400: 0.1
hw rank 255/400: 0.1
hw rank 256/400: 0.1
hw rank 257/400: 0.1
hw rank 258/400: 0.1
hw rank 259/400: 0.1
hw rank 260/400: 0.1
hw rank 261/400: 0.1
hw rank 262/400: 0.1
hw rank 263/400: 0.1
hw rank 264/400: 0.1
hw rank 265/400: 0.1
hw rank 266/400: 0.1
hw rank 267/400: 0.1
hw rank 268/400: 0.1
hw rank 269/400: 0.1
hw rank 270/400: 0.1
hw rank 271/400: 0.1
hw rank 272/400: 0.1
hw rank 273/400: 0.1
hw rank 274/400: 0.1
hw rank 275/400: 0.1
hw rank 276/400: 0.1
hw rank 277/400: 0.1
hw rank 278/400: 0.1
hw rank 279/400: 0.1
hw rank 280/400: 0.1
hw rank 281/400: 0.1
hw rank 282/400: 0.1
hw rank 283/400: 0.1
hw rank 284/400: 0.1
hw rank 285/400: 0.1
hw rank 286/400: 0.1
hw rank 287/400: 0.1
hw rank 288/400: 0.1
hw rank 289/400: 0.1
hw rank 290/400: 0.1
hw rank 291/400: 0.1
hw rank 292/400: 0.1
hw rank 293/400: 0.1
hw rank 294/400: 0.1
hw rank 295/400: 0.1
hw rank 296/400: 0.1
hw rank 297/400: 0.1
hw rank 298/400: 0.1
hw rank 299/400: 0.1
hw rank 300/400: 0.1
hw rank 301/400: 0.1
hw rank 302/400: 0.1
hw rank 303/400: 0.1
hw rank 304/400: 0.1
hw rank 305/400: 0.1
hw rank 306/400: 0.1
hw rank 307/400: 0.1
hw rank 308/400: 0.1
hw rank 309/400: 0.1
hw rank 310/400: 0.1
hw rank 311/400: 0.1
hw rank 312/400: 0.1
hw rank 313/400: 0.1
hw rank 314/400: 0.1
hw rank 315/400: 0.1
hw rank 316/400: 0.1
hw rank 317/400: 0.1
hw rank 318/400: 0.1
hw rank 319/400: 0.1
hw rank 320/400: 0.1
hw rank 321/400: 0.1
hw rank 322/400: 0.1
hw rank 323/400: 0.1
hw rank 324/400: 0.1
hw rank 325/400: 0.1
hw rank 326/400: 0.1
hw rank 327/400: 0.1
hw rank 328/400: 0.1
hw rank 329/400: 0.1
hw rank 330/400: 0.1
hw rank 331/400: 0.1
hw rank 332/400: 0.1
hw rank 333/400: 0.1
hw rank 334/400: 0.1
hw rank 335/400: 0.1
hw rank 336/400: 0.1
hw rank 337/400: 0.1
hw rank 338/400: 0.1
hw rank 339/400: 0.1
hw rank 340/400: 0.1
hw rank 341/400: 0.1
hw rank 342/400: 0.1
hw rank 343/400: 0.1
hw rank 344/400: 0.1
hw rank 345/400: 0.1
hw rank 346/400: 0.1
hw rank 347/400: 0.1
hw rank 348/400: 0.1
hw rank 349/400: 0.1
hw rank 350/400: 0.1
hw rank 351/400: 0.1
hw rank 352/400: 0.1
hw rank 353/400: 0.1
hw rank 354/400: 0.1
hw rank 355/400: 0.1
hw rank 356/400: 0.1
hw rank 357/400: 0.1
hw rank 358/400: 0.1
hw rank 359/400: 0.1
hw rank 360/400: 0.1
hw rank 361/400: 0.1
hw rank 362/400: 0.1
hw rank 363/400: 0.1
hw rank 364/400: 0.1
hw rank 365/400: 0.1
hw rank 366/400: 0.1
hw rank 367/400: 0.1
hw rank 368/400: 0.1
hw rank 369/400: 0.1
hw rank 370/400: 0.1
hw rank 371/400: 0.1
hw rank 372/400: 0.1
hw rank 373/400: 0.1
hw rank 374/400: 0.1
hw rank 375/400: 0.1
hw rank 376/400: 0.1
hw rank 377/400: 0.1
hw rank 378/400: 0.1
hw rank 379/400: 0.1
hw rank 380/400: 0.1
hw rank 381/400: 0.1
hw rank 382/400: 0.1
hw rank 383/400: 0.1
hw rank 384/400: 0.1
hw rank 385/400: 0.1
hw rank 386/400: 0.1
hw rank 387/400: 0.1
hw rank 388/400: 0.1
hw rank 389/400: 0.1
hw rank 390/400: 0.1
hw rank 391/400: 0.1
hw rank 392/400: 0.1
hw rank 393/400: 0.1
hw rank 394/400: 0.1
hw rank 395/400: 0.1
hw rank 396/400: 0.1
hw rank 397/400: 0.1
hw rank 398/400: 0.1
hw rank 399/400: 0.1
hw rank 400/400: 0.1

 

This "0,1 Points for the People"-Rule is killing HWbot. So many People would like to close with benching.

[Alriin]

Sorry, dont know why it post double.

[Warrior_oF_Byte]

I found bugs!!!! yeay!

 

Take a look at this weird rankings:

 

http://hwbot.org/rankings/benchmark/wprime_32m/rankings?cores=0

http://hwbot.org/rankings/benchmark/wprime_1024m/rankings?cores=0

http://hwbot.org/rankings/benchmark/3dmark_2001/rankings?cores=0

http://hwbot.org/rankings/benchmark/3dmark_2003/rankings?cores=0

 

2005 and 2006 are clean

 

ouch! i almost forgot 3D vantage! look!

http://hwbot.org/rankings/benchmark/3dmark_vantage_-_performance/rankings?cores=0

 

Do you have an achievement for found bugs ?

[FtW 420]

I submitted a few scores for an 8800 gts 320 mb card & while they show up in the hall of fame in the right spots for the hardware, they are coming up saying 'not FtW 420's best 3DMark Vantage - Performance GeForce 8800 GTS 320 Mb submission, only best is ranked.' even though they are my best scores submitted for that hardware. They also show no points, & my profile has not updated with the new scores since they went in this morning.

 

http://hwbot.org/result.do?resultId=936355

http://hwbot.org/result.do?resultId=936358

http://hwbot.org/result.do?resultId=936365

[hipro5]

Kovsk, SoF and a few others do make valid points. I just sat and read through 30 pages eek my eyes hurt. HWBOT has and will lose it's shine with this move............I am not really passionate about whichever way these decisions sway to argue vigorously but you do have to admit they are making some valid points...............not posting this to get a response...especially not from jmke...

 

I'll still use it sure.... just thought i'd put my 2 cents in there i guess

 

[edit] i really dont understand why you guys dont have a word with jmke.....seriously his posts are a joke

 

I'm with dinos on this too....

[hipro5]

I have too much respect for Hipro to come up with a sarcastic answer or alternatively a aggressive answer. So, just a normal 'no'.

 

That's fair enough for me and that's what I wanted to hear from you.....a simple "no" and nothing more.....

 

 

EDIT: I've found a "bug".....

 

Ex. When someone plays with SINGLE card and he get's the No1 place and 150points (ex.), and then he plays with DUAL cards (etc), he will get 0points for his other benchies with more cards on the same bench BUT he "cuts off" someone else's points for the DUAL card category....

So the second bencher will NOT get the MAXIMUM for the DUAL card category BUT the SECOND measurement....NOT FAIR if you ask me.....

 

Why?......I'll tell you why....

 

Vince benches and he gets No1 score of SINGLE card category

Andre benches and he gets No2 score of SINGLE card category

I bench and I get No3 score of SINGLE card category

and so on....

 

NOW....

 

WE ALL BENCH for the DUAL card category and we don't get any score of it BUT we "cut" the FIRST score of the bencher who will play ONLY for DUAL card category.....

SO if there are 10 people who played with SINLGE and DUAL cards and they have uploaded BOTH of their scores, HOW MANY points will the bencher who wants to play ONLY for the DUAL card category will get?.....0.1 points

 

So according to this, where is the fairness for the "poor benchers"....They will have NO CHANCE AT ALL.....

 

Ex No2:

 

Aquamark rankings....

 

We have some places there as for single/dual/tri/etc vgas....

 

We have the 5th first palces in SINGLE VGA category and ALSO 5th places in DUAL card categories (which we get NO points out of it)......

 

tsan is the FIRST user in DUAL card category who gets points......ALL of us don't get any point for this because we got from the SINGLE vga category.....

 

How many points tsan has get?........16points because WE have "cut him out"......

 

SO if "we" have taken ALL places for ALL categories up to 10th or up to 20th, how many points will a "poor bencher" gets?.....

Edited January 2, 2010 by hipro5

[Hollywood]

EDIT: I've found a "bug".....

 

Ex. When someone plays with SINGLE card and he get's the No1 place and 150points (ex.), and then he plays with DUAL cards (etc), he will get 0points for his other benchies with more cards on the same bench BUT he "cuts off" someone else's points for the DUAL card category....

So the second bencher will NOT get the MAXIMUM for the DUAL card category BUT the SECOND measurement....NOT FAIR if you ask me.....

 

Why?......I'll tell you why....

 

Vince benches and he gets No1 score of SINGLE card category

Andre benches and he gets No2 score of SINGLE card category

I bench and I get No3 score of SINGLE card category

and so on....

 

NOW....

 

WE ALL BENCH for the DUAL card category and we don't get any score of it BUT we "cut" the FIRST score of the bencher who will play ONLY for DUAL card category.....

SO if there are 10 people who played with SINLGE and DUAL cards and they have uploaded BOTH of their scores, HOW MANY points will the bencher who wants to play ONLY for the DUAL card category will get?.....0.1 points

 

Signed!

Thats why it would be better to have a category for each setup: 1xGPU, 2xGPU,3xGPU, 4xGPU and one overall ranking. Points should be given in all categories. HW and global. Use the system, points are given to a rank like it was in rev2. Benchers could choose in wich category they want to take part. Sure, ppl with more money could take part in all categories, but thats life! Example: You cant go and ask all F1 teams to drive slower just because you dont have a chance to beat them with your streetcar!!!!!!

 

Achivements: If you want to keep this useless feature (i found the submit button....rofl), pls use smaller pictures! If someone gets 10 achivements for example, the pictures take to much space on the profiles page.

 

Hollywood

Edited January 2, 2010 by Hollywood

[Massman]

You cant go and ask all F1 teams to drive slower just because you dont have a chance to beat them with your streetcar!!!!!!

 

We don't ask anyone to go slower, we challenge everyone to race in a highly competitive competition. Why should one be rewarded for racing alone?

[Chiller]

because he can race alone

[Leeghoofd]

Hipro5 take eg the 8800GT AM3 category , very very popular, even spot 99 get's 7.5 points in single card... the Rev3 is more baout single card thna multi setups... so why insist on playing just the multi card setup ?

 

The more people bench the more points EVERYONE get's !! This is one of the misconceptions maybe due to a lesser explenation !

 

because he can race alone

Single car race is a test drive not a race no audience, boring as hell, no audience means no money, no money means no sponsors, no sponsors = no race...

Edited January 2, 2010 by Leeghoofd

[Hollywood]

We don't ask anyone to go slower, we challenge everyone to race in a highly competitive competition. Why should one be rewarded for racing alone?

 

Hey Massman

 

I know what you re talking about. I guess we all know.

But it is a fact, that the new system is not as good as rev2 was. Rev2 was okay, just needed some little changes as i wrote b4. I rly like the idea of having 5 categories for 3D benchmarks. So its everyones decision in wich category he will take part. Ppl with less money would have a fair chance to get a fair amount of points in the 1xGPU category. This is about global points only.

 

Hollywood

Edited January 2, 2010 by Hollywood

[Massman]

WE ALL BENCH for the DUAL card category and we don't get any score of it BUT we "cut" the FIRST score of the bencher who will play ONLY for DUAL card category.....

SO if there are 10 people who played with SINLGE and DUAL cards and they have uploaded BOTH of their scores, HOW MANY points will the bencher who wants to play ONLY for the DUAL card category will get?.....0.1 points

 

Ok, I hear your problem. Here's what I'm thinking about

 

- All points you gather are added to you team's total. If you are 2nd and Tsan is 5th, it's better than you nowhere and Tsan 4th.

- The underlying cause is the multi-gpu being not so popular, not the inherent lower reward for this category

- You affect the popularity as well

- The "poor" bencher has the possibility to play in the single GPU category, whereas this used to be: you need dual gpu.

 

As far as I can see, it's still possible to get in the single gpu top 20 by using stock cooling (various examples available). This means that the we have the same effect as Rev2, but without the necessity to have to buy two dual-GPU graphics cards in order to get somewhere.

[Massman]

I know what you re talking about. I guess we all know.

But it is a fact, that the new system is not as good as rev2 was. Rev2 was okay, just needed some little changes as i wrote b4. I rly like the idea of having 5 categories for 3D benchmarks. So its everyones decision in wich category he will take part. Ppl with less money would have a fair chance to get a fair amount of points in the 1xGPU category. This is about global points only.

 

I fail to see how this revision is any worse than rev2 for those who are less fortunate in terms of financial input:

 

- Rev2: 2x dualGPU needed

- Rev3: 1x singe GPU with loads of effort OR 1x dual gpu at stock

 

At the moment, it's not thát impossible to get into the top40 1xGPU or top20 2xGPU. It takes a bit of effort ... yes. That's the whole point of rev3

[Massman]

because he can race alone

 

FYI: I've declared myself world champion of "Wheel-on-wheel-racing". I hope I get a million dollars now.

[Hollywood]

I fail to see how this revision is any worse than rev2 for those who are less fortunate in terms of financial input:

 

- Rev2: 2x dualGPU needed

- Rev3: 1x singe GPU with loads of effort OR 1x dual gpu at stock

 

At the moment, it's not thát impossible to get into the top40 1xGPU or top20 2xGPU. It takes a bit of effort ... yes. That's the whole point of rev3

 

IMO everyone should gain points in each category. Okay, he does, but only the best placed score is for the user. The other one is for the team only.

I dont get what was that wrong the points were given in rev2.

What about the 5 categories for 3D benches? Is this idea that worse?

[komadyret]

I haven't looked closely om the implications for my own submissions yet, but I think hwbot are on a right track here.

 

btw, it took forever to read through 42 pages of whining LOL

But some posts have opened up a few valid issues here.

 

And If I have missed a few crucial points in how the algorithm works, please bear over with me and correct me.

 

First, I'm not sure the distribution of global points are optimal as of now. It is true that the reward for spending time and LN2 on multi-gpu is a little low when points are given out based om popularity alone. My thoughts went to adding a factor/multiplier to the globals of multi-card benches to make a 2-3-4gpu bench earn globals equal of the singles despite having only half or less number of submissions. I think the insanely hgh scores should be rewarded a bit on top of the points awarded for beating the others in the same category to make those categories more worthvile.

That globals in the single-gpu is worth more than the globals in mulit-gpu is discouraging for those benching for points (a rare breed, are they?)

And maybe the hardware factor should not be based on the number of, let's say, 3x4870 submissions, but have hardwarepoints based on the overall popularity of the 4870, single and multi?

Still won't make owners of the dual-gpu/single-pcb(x2 cards) cards happy, but there is no reason they should be more happy than owners of cards that are unable to run dual/multi slot/gpu.

 

 

And the "unpopular" hardware points drop-off are looking somewhat artificial. 1.5points for a gold cup in an unchallenged category is plenty. 1 point would be enough. If there are 2 or 3 users it is not unchallenged anymore, and should receive a little more, perhaps 1.5 point.

I also think a gold cup should be worth a considerable higher amount of point than a silvercup, and there should be worthwhile points up for grabs for being in the top 50%

 

For 5 submissions my proposal would be 1.5-1.0-0.7-0.5-0.2

 

For more than 5 submissions but less than, lets say 20, last place should be awarded 0.1 point. For more popular categories I think only top 2/3 (66%) should receive points, with last place(s) earning 0.1 point and 1st place earning a good deal more than 2nd who earn a good deal more than 3rd, and make a smooth slow even decent to the lowest 0.1 point.

What I try to say is that the drop off from 1.2 or 0.9 or whatever to 0.1 is too abrupt. And if 1.5 points are awarded for 1st, I think 1.2 is too much for 2nd.

 

Overall I think this looks good tho, now I just need time to bench and try get back those 500 or so places I lost in the ranking

[Massman]

IMO everyone should gain points in each category. Okay, he does, but only the best placed score is for the user. The other one is for the team only.

I dont get what was that wrong the points were given in rev2.

What about the 5 categories for 3D benches? Is this idea that worse?

 

The downside of allowing everyone to score in all categories is that you make it mandatory to compete in all 4 categories in order to be somewhat competitive:

 

- Financial input is extremely large (5870 + 2x 5970 needed)

- Financial input is rewarded over skill/effort (those who can affort to bench, get points)

- The 3D aspect of hwboints is not balanced with the 2D effort (24 3D benchmarks, 7 2D)

 

These are the three main problems we faced when splitting rankings further. There were a couple other minor ones, but I can't remember them all at the moment.

 

The 5 categories is most definitly a viable solution, but I'm not that eager to apply this kind of major changes at this point. Rev3 has been up for less than 48h, which means that the real paradigm shift has yet to happen. Currently, everyone's still applying the Rev2 benching tactics to the Rev3 game, which inevitably leads to "wtf is happening"-situations. Before we can uncover the real flaws of Rev3, and apply fixes where needed, we need people to actually test the system. Both purely for boints and purely for rankings.