MaJ0r Posted April 17, 2012 Share Posted April 17, 2012 Sorry, i posted from Ipad, no way more nice result Vlad. I need your advice about 3770K :celebration: Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
sin0822 Posted April 17, 2012 Author Share Posted April 17, 2012 is there ivy that does worse than 6.3ghz on ln2? Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
OBR Posted April 18, 2012 Share Posted April 18, 2012 (edited) who cares about air? reviews for 99.99 percent ppl? sin - yes, one i had from intel was max 6.13 GHz -190! and some german guys here reported 5,8 GHz max under LN2 ... with E1 Edited April 18, 2012 by OBR Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
sin0822 Posted April 18, 2012 Author Share Posted April 18, 2012 reviews for 99.99 percent ppl? sin - yes, one i had from intel was max 6.13 GHz -190! and some german guys here reported 5,8 GHz max under LN2 ... with E1 wow really? Damn man, i didn't know they were that bad! haha thanks. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
oanvoanc Posted April 18, 2012 Share Posted April 18, 2012 (edited) retested my chip which did 5,8-5,9ghz and could reach 6,3 1m, 6,370 cpuz: http://www.overclockers.at/intel_processors/intel-ivy-bridge-core-i5-3570k-retail-unter-fluess_229576?postid=3316578#post3316578 the difference made the increase of bclk. 60x100 no boot 60x103 boot ok edit: max boot: ~6250mhz, no matter which multiplier. (tested ok: 58x - 61x) max bclk: 109,5mhz cbb: yes, when boot below 102,8bclk ~ -150°C Edited April 18, 2012 by oanvoanc Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Hazzan Posted April 18, 2012 Share Posted April 18, 2012 I sure someone will getting 7 jig 2D bench in out there...thats matter time Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
K404 Posted April 18, 2012 Share Posted April 18, 2012 Come on bro, that's too easy-a prediction. 7.5GHz? Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
K404 Posted April 18, 2012 Share Posted April 18, 2012 Come on bro, that's too easy-a prediction. 7.5GHz? Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
oanvoanc Posted April 18, 2012 Share Posted April 18, 2012 max bclk we have seen so far is 116. max possible multiplier is 63. so i guess, there isnt much headroom beyond 7ghz. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Pt1t Posted April 18, 2012 Share Posted April 18, 2012 Random E0 , best E1 on ... Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
TaPaKaH Posted April 18, 2012 Share Posted April 18, 2012 I sure someone will getting 7 jig 2D bench in out there...thats matter timealready done ... in Taiwanistan Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
oanvoanc Posted April 18, 2012 Share Posted April 18, 2012 i think it was in february Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Hondacity Posted April 18, 2012 Share Posted April 18, 2012 Come on bro, that's too easy-a prediction. 7.5GHz? whats stopping intel from raising the max multi(63x)? cpu is scaling really well. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
sin0822 Posted April 18, 2012 Author Share Posted April 18, 2012 stopping intel? themselves lol. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
K404 Posted April 18, 2012 Share Posted April 18, 2012 (edited) whats stopping intel from raising the max multi(63x)? cpu is scaling really well. Wouldn't it be easier to move to a default 125 BCLK? (IB-E) How is CPU multiplier derived? Higher multis will need a new silicon revision won't they... and 63 is a co-incidentally neat 6-bit binary number (ok, 64 is a binary number, but digital starts at 0, not 1) Edited April 18, 2012 by K404 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
OBR Posted April 19, 2012 Share Posted April 19, 2012 Random E0 , best E1 on ... yes! Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Lucky_n00b Posted April 19, 2012 Share Posted April 19, 2012 whats stopping intel from raising the max multi(63x)? cpu is scaling really well. Maybe Intel doesn't expect their Ivy Bridge can clock THAT well under cold? Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
dinos22 Posted April 19, 2012 Share Posted April 19, 2012 bclock isnt going to stop you maxing out your chip with 63x Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
K404 Posted April 19, 2012 Share Posted April 19, 2012 ...but 125x 63 is just short of 7.9GHz. No-one complained about any other chips having fixed multiplier but ever-increasing FSB/BCLK options... as long as we get the MHz, who cares which component of the clock we're adjusting? Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Pt1t Posted April 19, 2012 Share Posted April 19, 2012 3770K die shot Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Mafio Posted April 19, 2012 Share Posted April 19, 2012 isn't the IHS is soldered on CPU DIE ? taking off the IHS gave you any benefit in term of max frequency ? thanks Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
oanvoanc Posted April 19, 2012 Share Posted April 19, 2012 thanks for sharing. how is the die connected to the ihs? any information on how you managed to pop it off? Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Pt1t Posted April 19, 2012 Share Posted April 19, 2012 thanks for sharing.how is the die connected to the ihs? any information on how you managed to pop it off? I removed it with a big screwdriver ... BTW i didnt care to break it because the CPU was allready dead. Between DIE and ihs, there is some thermal paste. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
oanvoanc Posted April 19, 2012 Share Posted April 19, 2012 (edited) thanks for sharing edit: how do you guys overclock your ivy? -i guess on asus - rog connect -gigabyte - tool in windows? (i just tried asus, so i have no clue about gb) did anybody try the intel extreme tuning utility mentioned here: http://www.computerbase.de/bildstrecke/40586/3/ is it good? or does it just work on intel boards? Edited April 19, 2012 by oanvoanc Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
sin0822 Posted April 19, 2012 Author Share Posted April 19, 2012 forget extreme tuning. Right now please use Easytune6,. it is fully functional as far as I am concerned. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Join the conversation
You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.