Massman Posted May 14, 2012 Share Posted May 14, 2012 Not sure what's going on, but the Saberboob I'm testing seems highly inefficient in 32M. I think I'm not doing anything wrong as LSC is enabled as well as the cache options in the bios. Anyone got any clue? Pretty sure I'm just being a retard-at-the-keyboard again. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Splave Posted May 14, 2012 Share Posted May 14, 2012 yep that looks like poo, guess you need a gene or gd65 if you dare muahahahaha Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Massman Posted May 14, 2012 Author Share Posted May 14, 2012 Used the GD65 before ... that one was efficient enough. But now it's stuck at x16 multiplier Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
ME4ME Posted May 14, 2012 Share Posted May 14, 2012 (edited) yep that looks like poo, guess you need a gene or gd65 if you dare muahahahaha well it's strong. 2.15v for 2 hours benching was no issue. Got some weird CPU here that scales insanely with voltage, without for that mather reaching very high clocks. Just saying ... board should be no problem. @PJ: had an issue like that to. Suddenly all my memory multipliers over 1800 where gone. Reflashing bios, and changing between bios chips helped. No clue what happend tho. btw not using maxmem anymore? Edited May 14, 2012 by ME4ME Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Hondacity Posted May 14, 2012 Share Posted May 14, 2012 use the older bios from msi website. then flash again with the new one. i was stuck @ 57x and couldn't do 58x. but doing so let me use higher multi. use dos commands... it worked for me. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Christian Ney Posted May 14, 2012 Share Posted May 14, 2012 Hum We didn't find it that slow, which bios ? 13 Z77 Motherboard Tested Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
der8auer Posted May 14, 2012 Share Posted May 14, 2012 And I thought my efficiency was bad but yours is even worse Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Massman Posted May 14, 2012 Author Share Posted May 14, 2012 Efficiency on the MSI board seemed fine. It's a different OS install, though, but applied the same tweaks. @PJ: had an issue like that to. Suddenly all my memory multipliers over 1800 where gone. Reflashing bios, and changing between bios chips helped. No clue what happend tho. btw not using maxmem anymore? Well, it actually works perfectly at stock settings, but goes into x16 mode when adjusting the ... cpu voltage . Flashed BIOS, switched BIOS, flashed ME ... still going into x16 after Vcore adjustment. No maxmem tweak ... basic stuff first. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Delex Posted May 15, 2012 Share Posted May 15, 2012 (edited) Try to set trfc manually or to check it. On ASrock Z77 extreme6 I had the same difference. It was a memory issue 100x42 (4.2 GHz) 1200 7 11 7 28 1T - trfc 86/96 : 7.47.x min 100x42 (4.2 GHz) 1200 8 11 8 28 1T - trfc 110 : 7.38.x min GSKILL PIS 17600CL7D-4GBPIS kit Seems to be ea memory throtoling issue This is why i lost a lot here: Alex Edited May 15, 2012 by Delex Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
dinos22 Posted May 15, 2012 Share Posted May 15, 2012 damn, that looks really slow set maxmem so that wazza can work properly try UD5H Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Delex Posted May 15, 2012 Share Posted May 15, 2012 @dinos: it was for me or PJ? Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
dinos22 Posted May 15, 2012 Share Posted May 15, 2012 I just saw PJs first screen Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
MaJ0r Posted May 15, 2012 Share Posted May 15, 2012 Btw about board: when I used first time M5G efficiency was very poor, but when I set preset Elpida BBSE tight and flashed richt BIOS, I won 10 seconds at 4000MHz(but I bad tweaker). Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Massman Posted May 15, 2012 Author Share Posted May 15, 2012 damn, that looks really slow set maxmem so that wazza can work properly try UD5H I'll only take one of your suggestions. The UD5H Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Massman Posted May 16, 2012 Author Share Posted May 16, 2012 I might be doing something wrong; still about 9s too slow. No waza or subtiming tweaking, though ... so maybe it's just laziness. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
MaJ0r Posted May 16, 2012 Share Posted May 16, 2012 hmm I don't have such a good memory like you have but I think you lose minimum 3 sec(maybe I'm wrong) without tweaking and waza Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Splave Posted May 16, 2012 Share Posted May 16, 2012 3sec wazza 2-3sec secondary tweaking...maybe its because it doesnt have latency boundary like ROG? Between auto and setting 5 on the gene was about 3sec ish. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Hondacity Posted May 16, 2012 Share Posted May 16, 2012 1sec in the 3rd level settings Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
AndreYang Posted May 17, 2012 Share Posted May 17, 2012 it's massman. thats why. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Splave Posted May 17, 2012 Share Posted May 17, 2012 bwhahaha Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Join the conversation
You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.