Maxi Posted November 9, 2007 Share Posted November 9, 2007 Hi Jaan, Your score is not in the top 20 (front page), and is currently the 6th ranked QX6950 in wPrime 32M. You already have a faster 32M in this bench, therfore you can only earn hardware points. Your fixed as well Hak Foo Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Potapicus Posted November 9, 2007 Share Posted November 9, 2007 PLEASE!!! FIX IT!!!!! 2 more links - Cel433 slot1 - but results for s370 user - Quentj (JMax-Hardware) http://www.hwbot.org/compare.do?resultId=632593 http://www.hwbot.org/compare.do?resultId=633046 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Maxi Posted November 9, 2007 Share Posted November 9, 2007 There's no need to yell, I left these for a reason They are correct now. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Potapicus Posted November 10, 2007 Share Posted November 10, 2007 Maxi - if you answer to me - I don't see corrected results - they are still in wrong category ((( Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
demiurg Posted November 11, 2007 Share Posted November 11, 2007 http://hwbot.org/result.do?resultId=631560 P4 650 (Presscot R0 200x17) in P4 2,8GHz (Presscot C0 200x14) category o polonos IMHO you should make your job more carefully! Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Bwanasoft Posted November 11, 2007 Share Posted November 11, 2007 can you fix this http://www.hwbot.org/quickSearch.do?hardwareId=CPU_354 http://www.hwbot.org/result.do?resultId=609833 wrong verification wrong CPU http://www.hwbot.org/result.do?resultId=609787 no verification http://www.hwbot.org/result.do?resultId=619681 wrong verification wrong CPU http://www.hwbot.org/result.do?resultId=609789 wrong CPU Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
dami1stm Posted November 11, 2007 Share Posted November 11, 2007 Hello all, i have an problem, two submissions of my team for very good time at SuperPi 1m was deleted (7.953 and 8.109s). Maybe can you think that we used the same processor for all these result, but it's false ! We have test 8 Penryn QX9650 :woot: Please, rehabilitate the results which are due to us, thank you :ws: Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Kolian Posted November 12, 2007 Share Posted November 12, 2007 http://www.hwbot.org/result.do?resultId=661644 - wrong resolution in 3DMark06 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
o polonos Posted November 12, 2007 Share Posted November 12, 2007 o polonosIMHO you should make your job more carefully! Only IM moderator ? Report one score and im gonna fix it .... Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Potapicus Posted November 12, 2007 Share Posted November 12, 2007 will ANYBODY FIX IT: 2 more links - Cel433 slot1 - but results for s370 user - Quentj (JMax-Hardware) http://www.hwbot.org/compare.do?resultId=632593 http://www.hwbot.org/compare.do?resultId=633046 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
foxhound Posted November 12, 2007 Share Posted November 12, 2007 I can't submit my result with penryn QX9650 because I have the same score as stoolman at super pi 1m (http://img91.imageshack.us/img91/8871/foxroxorhh3.png) plz help me Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
demiurg Posted November 13, 2007 Share Posted November 13, 2007 o polonus I can not report the score because it is already checked by you. 05 Aug 2007 09:05 created botservice scanned by bot on forum 01 Sep 2007 11:49 reported kim55 reported by user due to wrong hardware match () 18 Sep 2007 05:39 modified o polonos manually modified by moderator (o polonos) - reason: no reason given 18 Sep 2007 05:40 checked (crew) o polonos checked by a moderator (moved to right cathegory ) 18 Sep 2007 05:40 modified o polonos manually modified by moderator (o polonos) - reason: no reason given That is why I asked you be more carefully. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Maxi Posted November 13, 2007 Share Posted November 13, 2007 Hello all, i have an problem, two submissions of my team for very good time at SuperPi 1m was deleted (7.953 and 8.109s). Maybe can you think that we used the same processor for all these result, but it's false ! We have test 8 Penryn QX9650 :woot: Please, rehabilitate the results which are due to us, thank you :ws: Thanks you for the image dami1. The problem is the results feature the exact same format screen shot - apparently done by the same person. Having the processors is helpful but does not show the user(s) in question actually did the benching alone. The results we're also submitted on the same day. It seems rather clear they we're done during a team bench session and in that case the results should not be posted to individual user accounts, instead they should be posted under the jmax_oc Team account only. If you have any further information about this we are happy to take another look maxi Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Maxi Posted November 13, 2007 Share Posted November 13, 2007 will ANYBODY FIX IT: 2 more links - Cel433 slot1 - but results for s370 user - Quentj (JMax-Hardware) http://www.hwbot.org/compare.do?resultId=632593 http://www.hwbot.org/compare.do?resultId=633046 Sorry potapicus, there appears to be a glitch happening here. It will take some research to find out why this is happening, the edit's do not take. maxi Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Maxi Posted November 13, 2007 Share Posted November 13, 2007 It's OK now potapicus, you can relax Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Potapicus Posted November 13, 2007 Share Posted November 13, 2007 Yeahhhhh!!!!!!! Thanks!!!! Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
debauer Posted November 13, 2007 Share Posted November 13, 2007 hi, http://www.hwbot.org/result.do?resultId=626204 The result is a Celeron and not a Pentium 4. Thank you. I want my 1. Place Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
gradus Posted November 13, 2007 Share Posted November 13, 2007 http://www.hwbot.org/result.do?resultId=664628 unblock plz. I can't send 2001mark verification file. ORB not work(only 2001) 2 or 3 days. http://service.futuremark.com/servlet/Index?pageid=/orb/projectdetails&XLID=9287096&UID=12082026&projectType=6 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
demiurg Posted November 14, 2007 Share Posted November 14, 2007 hi, http://www.hwbot.org/result.do?resultId=626204 The result is a Celeron and not a Pentium 4. Thank you. I want my 1. Place Fixed. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
debauer Posted November 14, 2007 Share Posted November 14, 2007 Fixed. THX Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
mikiiioo Posted November 16, 2007 Share Posted November 16, 2007 http://www.hwbot.org/compare.do?resultId=659280 wrong card Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
demiurg Posted November 16, 2007 Share Posted November 16, 2007 http://www.hwbot.org/compare.do?resultId=659280 wrong card Look at the score! 8800GTS can not do such miserable score That is 7300GS Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Bwanasoft Posted November 17, 2007 Share Posted November 17, 2007 hey guys, i think i found a paintmaster - cheater look this http://www.hwbot.org/result.do?resultId=577815 http://www.hwbot.org/result.do?resultId=576582 CPUZ Say C2D E6500 but in the middle iss a free Place - a big hole i think it´s a C2D E4600 here iss the same Problem, but in the right Categorie http://www.hwbot.org/result.do?resultId=664971 i think the user Horrorwood cheats http://www.hwbot.org/user.do?userId=7320 at this CPU here iss my CPU :battle: Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
hipro5 Posted November 17, 2007 Share Posted November 17, 2007 Maybe it's because he uses an OLD Cpu-z V.1.35 ...... Why your cpu-z say at the top "E6500" and in the middle "E4600".... ?... Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Bwanasoft Posted November 17, 2007 Share Posted November 17, 2007 yes it´s an old version but i don´t have the hole in the middle. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts