maxine Posted November 17, 2007 Share Posted November 17, 2007 COWIE (1st WR pcmark05): Some people use 6800 PCI-X results in the 6800 APG category.... If im not mistake..NV41 is PCI-X..... http://www.hwbot.org/searchResults.do?direction=&applicationId=5&teamId=0&userName=&gpu=GeForce+6800+Agp+%28171%29&cpu=&chipset=&model=&manufacturer=&minScore=&maxScore=&gpuId=1184&cpuId=0&chipsetId=0&modelId=0&manufacturerId=0&offset=0&displayAdvanced=false&countryId=0&dateFrom=&dateUntil=&minGpuCoreFreq=&maxGpuCoreFreq=&minGpuMemFreq=&maxGpuMemFreq=&minCpuFreq=&maxCpuFreq=&system=&minTotalPoints= You can see an E6850 4.0Gz with it...but the only motherboard for 775 and AGP is 4CoreDual-VSTA or 4CoreDual-SATA2 wich can´t pass 350 in the FSB...(359 is the WR for this mobo). ------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- The same for this guy (V|ALDY), 1st WR 3dmark03 All of us knows that mobo Lanparty UT (939) haven´t AGP slot...so, please move to the correct category.... http://www.hwbot.org/searchResults.do?direction=&applicationId=2&teamId=0&userName=&gpu=GeForce+6800+Agp+%28171%29&cpu=&chipset=&model=&manufacturer=&minScore=&maxScore=&gpuId=1184&cpuId=0&chipsetId=0&modelId=0&manufacturerId=0&offset=0&displayAdvanced=false&countryId=0&dateFrom=&dateUntil=&minGpuCoreFreq=&maxGpuCoreFreq=&minGpuMemFreq=&maxGpuMemFreq=&minCpuFreq=&maxCpuFreq=&system=&minTotalPoints= -------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- Other guy with more than FSB>359 (remember Asrock 775 + agp is the only exist mobo), under suspice PCI-X in the AGP categ. He no show mobo, because of course, it´s an PCI-X card.... http://www.hwbot.org/searchResults.do?direction=&applicationId=1&teamId=0&userName=&gpu=GeForce+6800+Agp+%28171%29&cpu=&chipset=&model=&manufacturer=&minScore=&maxScore=&gpuId=1184&cpuId=0&chipsetId=0&modelId=0&manufacturerId=0&offset=0&displayAdvanced=false&countryId=0&dateFrom=&dateUntil=&minGpuCoreFreq=&maxGpuCoreFreq=&minGpuMemFreq=&maxGpuMemFreq=&minCpuFreq=&maxCpuFreq=&system=&minTotalPoints= ------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- Here the same cheaters in AQUAMARK....the 1st and 2th positions are PCI-X cards (note the 3th is CORRECT with an 4CoreDual-VSTA and AGP card). http://www.hwbot.org/searchResults.do?direction=&applicationId=10&teamId=0&userName=&gpu=GeForce+6800+Agp+%28171%29&cpu=&chipset=&model=&manufacturer=&minScore=&maxScore=&gpuId=1184&cpuId=0&chipsetId=0&modelId=0&manufacturerId=0&offset=0&displayAdvanced=false&countryId=0&dateFrom=&dateUntil=&minGpuCoreFreq=&maxGpuCoreFreq=&minGpuMemFreq=&maxGpuMemFreq=&minCpuFreq=&maxCpuFreq=&system=&minTotalPoints= ------------------------------------------------------------- I think a CPU-Z showing mobo,cpu and memory must be mandatory for upload any result. Also in AQ3. Please not cheat, hwbot it´s a comunity for compare hardware and a great OC community. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Bwanasoft Posted November 18, 2007 Share Posted November 18, 2007 Your Links are incorrect, but It give´s DFI Lanparty UT with AGP - i have it LANPARTY UT nF3 250Gb The Asrock Mainboard can be Clock higher over mod´s with bridges on the Backsite you can Clock it up to FSB 350 and more than 1,6 Volt - my Asrock Board run with X6800EE FSB 300 multi 12 without Problems. Fix the result links an we can see the Problem. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
71proste Posted November 18, 2007 Share Posted November 18, 2007 http://www.hwbot.org/compare.do?resultId=656287 wrong screen,wrong card Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
lunatic@98 Posted November 18, 2007 Share Posted November 18, 2007 Maybe it's because he uses an OLD Cpu-z V.1.35 ...... Why your cpu-z say at the top "E6500" and in the middle "E4600".... ?... yes it´s an old version but i don´t have the hole in the middle. hmm, my question: Why he have on this screen (MMX SSE SSE2 SSE3 SSE4 EM64T) and by his own CPUz vali (MMX SSE SSE2 SSE3 SSSE3 EM64T) ? http://valid.x86-secret.com/show_oc.php?id=107830 This is the same CPUz version Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
foxhound Posted November 18, 2007 Share Posted November 18, 2007 Hi I can't submit my score with QX9650 @ 5698Mhz the screen: help me plz Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
dami1stm Posted November 18, 2007 Share Posted November 18, 2007 Great score which Team JMax-Hardware sees amputating since + one week, it would indeed be to be able to solve the problem. I had post here even (it seems to me) a photo with 8 QX9650 tested by the team. :ws: Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
maxine Posted November 18, 2007 Share Posted November 18, 2007 Collection of wrong results....mainly Nvidia 6800 PCX in AGP categ. ------------------------------------------------------------------------ This is an Opteron 144 (socket 939) in a Lanparty NF4-D running an 6800AGP card (see ORB link) THIS MOBO NOT HAVE AGP SLOT.....so, please move to the correct category http://www.hwbot.org/result.do?resultId=661112 This is an PCI-X 6800 in an AGP categ....NV41 (see rivatuner) is PCX if i´m not mistake... http://www.hwbot.org/result.do?resultId=653104 Another PCX in AGP categ...see his sign (Abit ip35-pro + 6800GS)....THIS MOBO HAVENT AGP. So it´s clear it´s an PCX in the AGP categ. Please, move to the correct categ. http://www.hwbot.org/result.do?resultId=656979 http://www.hwbot.org/result.do?resultId=656695 ------------------------------------------------------------------------- Bwana, i have also the 4CoredDual-SATA2 with ALL mods possible....this mobo can do 350-370 max (the record is 359, i saw an screenshot of this).....See this results doing more than 450 x 9...do you really think this is posible in a SATA2/VSTA...i think is a no-no.....suspice 6800PCX in AGP categ...none of the following URLs supply a CPU-Z showing mobo or any sign of AGP card.... 7 x 460 .... http://www.hwbot.org/result.do?resultId=656711 9 x 451 ....you must calculate ( aq3, e6850 at 4060Mhz) http://www.hwbot.org/result.do?resultId=652154 9 x 430 .... http://www.hwbot.org/result.do?resultId=651721 I dont know any motherboard with the 775 slot and AGP slot other than SATA2/VSTA...and like i said can´t pass 370 fsb...so they must have a SUPER-UNKNOW motherboard or they simply cheat.... If you can give me some screenshot of a SATA2/VSTA doing more than 380 fsb i will invite you to some good german beer!, . Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Bwanasoft Posted November 19, 2007 Share Posted November 19, 2007 it´s right i think the same t your post - block it and the mods must work Asrock board iss right - never over 400 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
71proste Posted November 19, 2007 Share Posted November 19, 2007 http://www.hwbot.org/compare.do?resultId=637663 project isn't valid http://www.hwbot.org/compare.do?resultId=607923 project isn't valid http://www.hwbot.org/compare.do?resultId=637667 project isn't valid http://www.hwbot.org/compare.do?resultId=569156 project isn't valid Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
kretfr Posted November 19, 2007 Share Posted November 19, 2007 Screens haven't CPU-Z Memory window. http://www.hwbot.org/result.do?resultId=649584 http://www.hwbot.org/result.do?resultId=650183'>http://www.hwbot.org/result.do?resultId=650183 http://www.hwbot.org/result.do?resultId=650272 http://www.hwbot.org/result.do?resultId=646132 http://www.hwbot.org/result.do?resultId=645795 Suspicious results of Pifast: 1st - http://www.hwbot.org/result.do?resultId=650183 - 26.86s @ 3410 MHz 2nd - http://www.hwbot.org/result.do?resultId=657929 - 36.6s @ 3314 MHz 3rd - http://www.hwbot.org/result.do?resultId=634771 - 37.22s @ 3224 MHz 4th - http://www.hwbot.org/result.do?resultId=649644 - 39.77s @ 3307 MHz 5th - http://www.hwbot.org/result.do?resultId=633553 - 40s @ 3009 MHz Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Pepek86 Posted November 21, 2007 Share Posted November 21, 2007 http://www.hwbot.org/result.do?resultId=659104 http://www.hwbot.org/result.do?resultId=659020 http://www.hwbot.org/result.do?resultId=666878 screens don't show resolution Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
aspstein Posted November 22, 2007 Share Posted November 22, 2007 Wrong PCMark05 results: http://www.hwbot.org/result.do?resultId=628686 - Dead validation link http://www.hwbot.org/result.do?resultId=602394 - No screenshot and dead validation link Look at this score, under the test phane in pcmark, is it supposed to look that way? Looks photoshoped to me. http://www.hwbot.org/result.do?resultId=655301 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
boblemagnifique Posted November 22, 2007 Share Posted November 22, 2007 Not good time : http://www.hwbot.org/result.do?resultId=640950 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Bwanasoft Posted November 22, 2007 Share Posted November 22, 2007 Never a XP 2000 CPU Cpu z fail - Wrong superpi verfication - Think other CPU http://www.hwbot.org/result.do?resultId=666801 http://www.hwbot.org/result.do?resultId=666797 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Crew Turrican Posted November 22, 2007 Crew Share Posted November 22, 2007 he postet the "cpu score" instead of the "pcmark score". see screenshot http://www.hwbot.org/result.do?resultId=665550 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
dinos22 Posted November 23, 2007 Share Posted November 23, 2007 Not good time : http://www.hwbot.org/result.do?resultId=640950 lol that's a 23m+ run heheheheh Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
demiurg Posted November 23, 2007 Share Posted November 23, 2007 Not good time : http://www.hwbot.org/result.do?resultId=640950 I can not fix this result, because it is already checked by crew moderator Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
hipro5 Posted November 24, 2007 Share Posted November 24, 2007 Incorrect time writen.....Not fair for stoolman.... http://www.hwbot.org/result.do?resultId=663503 . Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Maxi Posted November 24, 2007 Share Posted November 24, 2007 Fixed, thanks hipro. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Maxi Posted November 24, 2007 Share Posted November 24, 2007 http://www.hwbot.org/result.do?resultId=659104http://www.hwbot.org/result.do?resultId=659020 http://www.hwbot.org/result.do?resultId=666878 screens don't show resolution Fixed. Wrong PCMark05 results: http://www.hwbot.org/result.do?resultId=628686 - Dead validation link http://www.hwbot.org/result.do?resultId=602394 - No screenshot and dead validation link Look at this score, under the test phane in pcmark, is it supposed to look that way? Looks photoshoped to me. http://www.hwbot.org/result.do?resultId=655301 #1 fixed, #2 was previously validated by a moderator, #3 nothing wrong with this. Not good time : http://www.hwbot.org/result.do?resultId=640950 Bug, we're working on it Never a XP 2000 CPU Cpu z fail - Wrong superpi verfication - Think other CPU http://www.hwbot.org/result.do?resultId=666801 http://www.hwbot.org/result.do?resultId=666797 No these are fine bwana, please look before reporting. he postet the "cpu score" instead of the "pcmark score". see screenshot http://www.hwbot.org/result.do?resultId=665550 Fixed I can not fix this result, because it is already checked by crew moderator Actually there is a bug somewhere, I can't fix it either. We're looking at this. Thanks for reporting everyone Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Crew Turrican Posted November 24, 2007 Crew Share Posted November 24, 2007 no resolution, video card clocks and cpu clocks are shown http://www.hwbot.org/result.do?resultId=605326 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
SArd Posted November 24, 2007 Share Posted November 24, 2007 It not GeForce 7600 Go GT, but is simple GeForce 7600 GT http://www.hwbot.org/result.do?resultId=656560 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Bwanasoft Posted November 25, 2007 Share Posted November 25, 2007 @ Maxi My benches are the same before but opolonos blocked all The Windows PI Calculate Done fail. Fix it this are not a real verification !!! CPUZ FAIL - look here your Rules http://www.hwbot.org/img/examples/SuperPi.jpg look at your verification Options http://www.hwbot.org/result.do?resultId=666797 http://www.hwbot.org/result.do?resultId=666801 look at the times from the other benches - CAN NOT BE ! Its other CPU Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Bwanasoft Posted November 25, 2007 Share Posted November 25, 2007 PCMARK 05 Screen for CPU SCORE all Wrong - the CPU´s dosn´t Support SSE and PcMark05 goes not with Grafikbench. Athlon CPU http://www.hwbot.org/result.do?resultId=665540 http://www.hwbot.org/result.do?resultId=665541 http://www.hwbot.org/result.do?resultId=665543 http://www.hwbot.org/result.do?resultId=665544 http://www.hwbot.org/result.do?resultId=665545 http://www.hwbot.org/result.do?resultId=665546 http://www.hwbot.org/result.do?resultId=665547 http://www.hwbot.org/result.do?resultId=665548 http://www.hwbot.org/result.do?resultId=665549 http://www.hwbot.org/result.do?resultId=667379 http://www.hwbot.org/result.do?resultId=667384 http://www.hwbot.org/result.do?resultId=667389 http://www.hwbot.org/result.do?resultId=667403 http://www.hwbot.org/result.do?resultId=667413 http://www.hwbot.org/result.do?resultId=667418 Duron CPU http://www.hwbot.org/result.do?resultId=665826 http://www.hwbot.org/result.do?resultId=665829 http://www.hwbot.org/result.do?resultId=665831 http://www.hwbot.org/result.do?resultId=665833 http://www.hwbot.org/result.do?resultId=641743 http://www.hwbot.org/result.do?resultId=665835 http://www.hwbot.org/result.do?resultId=665836 http://www.hwbot.org/result.do?resultId=665838 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
klopcha Posted November 25, 2007 Share Posted November 25, 2007 Quote:Originally Posted by klopcha View Post Kindly I remind Originally Posted by klopcha View Post http://hwbot.org/result.do?resultId=644052 ??? If results 2001 and 2003 it is necessary to block and Aquamark have been blocked Sorry for my bad english. WHEN me will hear? HEAR? Quote: Originally Posted by klopcha View Post Malicious Cheater - Paulo Jorge ( Team: Techzonept) !!!!!!!! GeForce FX5600 - 3D 2003 Mark 3542 marks - Paulo Jorge (Techzonept) - (GeForce FX 5600 @ 391/343mhz) 3458 marks - PJ (Techzonept) - (GeForce FX 5600 @ 390/335mhz ) 3373 marks - PFJ (Techzonept) - (GeForce FX 5600 @ 391/343mhz) 3368 marks - AGP (Techzonept) - (GeForce FX 5600 @ 393/343mhz) 3232 marks - M_Guy (Techzonept) - (GeForce FX 5600 @ 390/335mhz) In 3D Mark 2001, 2005 situation similar. The identical CPU, MB, RAM. I ask to take very strict measures. Where are Moderators ? If have heard the Potapicus it is time to hear me also Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts