Jump to content
HWBOT Community Forums

Wrong Result


Recommended Posts

http://www.hwbot.org/compare.do?resultId=676391

 

Verification shows an Ati X1900 Gpu but its in the NV 8600GTS Ranking and his Nature test score can`t be that high (465 @ 870 gpu, i have 388 @ 990Mhz GPU)

Futuremark shows same points in all test as this one

User uses the same futuremark link (But with edited Project details)

http://www.hwbot.org/compare.do?resultId=631790

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • Replies 1.9k
  • Created
  • Last Reply

Top Posters In This Topic

Top Posters In This Topic

Posted Images

These users have a X1300 with 256MB instead of 128MB!

 

1. http://www.hwbot.org/result.do?resultId=610037

2. http://www.hwbot.org/result.do?resultId=618238

 

This is the Futuremark Link for the result:

1. http://service.futuremark.com/compare?3dm05=3098321

2. http://service.futuremark.com/compare?3dm06=1704192

 

This user has no verification link, only a piece of a screenshot, that everyone could have made on it's own:

3. http://www.hwbot.org/result.do?resultId=572186

Link to comment
Share on other sites

http://www.hwbot.org/compare.do?resultId=676391

 

Verification shows an Ati X1900 Gpu but its in the NV 8600GTS Ranking and his Nature test score can`t be that high (465 @ 870 gpu, i have 388 @ 990Mhz GPU)

Futuremark shows same points in all test as this one

User uses the same futuremark link (But with edited Project details)

http://www.hwbot.org/compare.do?resultId=631790

 

Fixed

 

 

Fixed

 

http://www.hwbot.org/compare.do?resultId=675042

Single Card instead of an sli.

 

fixed

 

Similar prob as on post 801# (Same User)

http://www.hwbot.org/compare.do?resultId=672439

Card specs like Bios default clock etc. are the same

Like this one

http://www.hwbot.org/compare.do?resultId=673759

Seems a bit strange!

 

Seems like two different cards to me

 

can someone verify that this result is valid:http://www.hwbot.org/result.do?resultId=659891

as you can see, there no 2nd thread calculation and I suppose 2nd core got lost somewhere in the process due to 2high overclock(thats what happened to mine brisbane when I tried 3.3ghz - it finished calculation,but 2nd core somehow dissapeared)

 

You can manually set the number of threads

 

This is an Opteron 144 (socket 939) in a Lanparty NF4-D running an 6800 card (see ORB link). THIS MOBO NOT HAVE AGP SLOT.....so, please move to the correct category (P.Express instead AGP)

 

http://www.hwbot.org/result.do?resultId=661112

 

fixed

 

dear m8ts please look this result it is posted in wrong

area the test is for wprime32m and it is posted in wprime1024 area

 

edit....

the notice is for the first result by polonos

 

http://www.hwbot.org/result.do?resultId=633337

 

fixed

 

This score looks like a regular FX5200 ... not a FX5200SE

Maybe i'm wrong.

Can some moderator ask for a gpu-z or rivatuner screenshot ?

 

http://www.hwbot.org/result.do?resultId=675595

 

fixed

 

http://www.hwbot.org/compare.do?resultId=675478

First it Looks like an fake 8400GS with 128bit memory bus

512MB and 8 Rop`s from Gigabyte but gigabyte doesn`t have such a Card

second with near same cpu clock but lower gpu and shader clock he has 9k more in aq3 thats not possible.

and here look at these specs same card but an 8500gt seems to me like an strapped rom. Bios and the other specs like 512mb default clock are the same as above but it is an 8500gt!!

http://www.hwbot.org/compare.do?resultId=675570

 

fixed

 

These users have a X1300 with 256MB instead of 128MB!

 

1. http://www.hwbot.org/result.do?resultId=610037

2. http://www.hwbot.org/result.do?resultId=618238

 

This is the Futuremark Link for the result:

1. http://service.futuremark.com/compare?3dm05=3098321

2. http://service.futuremark.com/compare?3dm06=1704192

 

This user has no verification link, only a piece of a screenshot, that everyone could have made on it's own:

3. http://www.hwbot.org/result.do?resultId=572186

 

fixed

Link to comment
Share on other sites

 

I can see the resolution

 

 

Fixed

 

here I go then :

its from an email I just received from hwbot-and Im not sure whether it is possible to reply to that e.mail adress.

 

 

I wasnt aware that running gametests in 3dmark2001 in succesion is forbidden. I ran all the game tests one by one,with a 30sec. pause between for cooling down vga, which in the end got me a valid result ,no? anyway, i apologize once again if I misplaced this reply...

 

Fixed

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Does't have any information on gpu and cpu.looks like 1650 ddr3 or xt?with amd cpu mor 3000 point in 3dmark 06? http://www.hwbot.org/compare.do?resultId=670212

 

Fixed

 

These scores from johncjs does't have any information on gpu and cpu.

http://www.hwbot.org/result.do?resultId=676466

http://www.hwbot.org/result.do?resultId=675423

http://www.hwbot.org/result.do?resultId=676468 - and this score is too high(SLI maybe?)

 

And this score has invalid futuremark link

http://www.hwbot.org/result.do?resultId=635889

 

Fixed

 

Massman: Do not forget about my last post!

 

I do my best, will take a look at it asap :). Thanks for the heads up !!

 

muahhhhh

 

at the moment you have more work like me Massmann ??? :D

 

:D;)

Link to comment
Share on other sites

This user is definitely cheating somehow, he has DDR1 Memory at 400MHz, an Opteron clocked at 3GHz and a X1950 Pro clocked at 635 / 709 and has 7554 3D Marks in 3DMark06. Impossible!

http://www.hwbot.org/result.do?resultId=665260

 

I made a Bench by myself with E6700 @ 3,6GHz, Dual DDR2 @ 920MHz and the same Graphics Card X1950 Pro @ 645 / 820 and get 5800 3D Marks, so the user listed above cannot get more than 2800 3DMarks with such a crappy Hardware!

 

Besides: Almost all Users in the list "Benchmarking -> Benchmark Results -> Search -> 3DMark 06 + X1950 Pro 256 Single" has NO verification Link to Futuremark! Only Images, that could be made with Paint and some "Verification Links" to HWBot itself! Futuremark Verification Links should be necessary to submit a result!

 

Regards,

CuB3

Link to comment
Share on other sites

http://www.hwbot.org/compare.do?resultId=677223 this result was blocked already,but is on the top again,what is wrong???wrong resolution,should be 1280/1024 not 1024/768

http://www.hwbot.org/compare.do?resultId=676279 resolution not visible

http://www.hwbot.org/compare.do?resultId=675929 wrong resolution again

http://www.hwbot.org/compare.do?resultId=648594 name of card missing

http://www.hwbot.org/compare.do?resultId=625871 name of card missing

http://www.hwbot.org/compare.do?resultId=629564 name of card missing

http://www.hwbot.org/compare.do?resultId=599323 wrong screen

http://www.hwbot.org/compare.do?resultId=610133 resolution not visible

Link to comment
Share on other sites

http://www.hwbot.org/result.do?resultId=675099 - again picture without any information.As I can see on any picture he submit he didn't show memory/gpu clock of the card.

 

http://www.hwbot.org/result.do?resultId=676464 - and score too high(and look the scores with 7300gt ddr3 in aquamark with much higher clocks and better cpu and they have similar score).

See for example: http://www.hwbot.org/result.do?resultId=625681 (which is ok score) - he has a way better cpu and 10MHz more for core, and 60 MHz less for memory, and a score more than 10% less then johncsj's score.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

pleace check this

 

http://www.hwbot.org/result.do?resultId=677400 I can´t see the resolution on this micro Picture (3D06 Advanted Edition)

http://www.hwbot.org/result.do?resultId=677811 no resolution (3D05 prof Edition)

http://www.hwbot.org/result.do?resultId=677405 no resolution (3D03 prof Edition)

http://www.hwbot.org/result.do?resultId=677748 need more proof of the screen

 

http://www.hwbot.org/result.do?resultId=676554

and

http://www.hwbot.org/result.do?resultId=676845

the same user with same card

 

http://www.hwbot.org/result.do?resultId=675509 no resolution

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Guest
This topic is now closed to further replies.

×
×
  • Create New...