Freakezoit Posted December 15, 2007 Share Posted December 15, 2007 http://www.hwbot.org/compare.do?resultId=676391 Verification shows an Ati X1900 Gpu but its in the NV 8600GTS Ranking and his Nature test score can`t be that high (465 @ 870 gpu, i have 388 @ 990Mhz GPU) Futuremark shows same points in all test as this one User uses the same futuremark link (But with edited Project details) http://www.hwbot.org/compare.do?resultId=631790 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
CuB3 Posted December 15, 2007 Share Posted December 15, 2007 These users have a X1300 with 256MB instead of 128MB! 1. http://www.hwbot.org/result.do?resultId=610037 2. http://www.hwbot.org/result.do?resultId=618238 This is the Futuremark Link for the result: 1. http://service.futuremark.com/compare?3dm05=3098321 2. http://service.futuremark.com/compare?3dm06=1704192 This user has no verification link, only a piece of a screenshot, that everyone could have made on it's own: 3. http://www.hwbot.org/result.do?resultId=572186 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Massman Posted December 15, 2007 Share Posted December 15, 2007 http://www.hwbot.org/compare.do?resultId=676391 Verification shows an Ati X1900 Gpu but its in the NV 8600GTS Ranking and his Nature test score can`t be that high (465 @ 870 gpu, i have 388 @ 990Mhz GPU) Futuremark shows same points in all test as this one User uses the same futuremark link (But with edited Project details) http://www.hwbot.org/compare.do?resultId=631790 Fixed Bad screens:http://www.hwbot.org/result.do?resultId=676318 http://www.hwbot.org/result.do?resultId=676268 http://www.hwbot.org/result.do?resultId=676307 Fixed http://www.hwbot.org/compare.do?resultId=675042Single Card instead of an sli. fixed Similar prob as on post 801# (Same User)http://www.hwbot.org/compare.do?resultId=672439 Card specs like Bios default clock etc. are the same Like this one http://www.hwbot.org/compare.do?resultId=673759 Seems a bit strange! Seems like two different cards to me can someone verify that this result is valid:http://www.hwbot.org/result.do?resultId=659891as you can see, there no 2nd thread calculation and I suppose 2nd core got lost somewhere in the process due to 2high overclock(thats what happened to mine brisbane when I tried 3.3ghz - it finished calculation,but 2nd core somehow dissapeared) You can manually set the number of threads This is an Opteron 144 (socket 939) in a Lanparty NF4-D running an 6800 card (see ORB link). THIS MOBO NOT HAVE AGP SLOT.....so, please move to the correct category (P.Express instead AGP) http://www.hwbot.org/result.do?resultId=661112 fixed dear m8ts please look this result it is posted in wrongarea the test is for wprime32m and it is posted in wprime1024 area edit.... the notice is for the first result by polonos http://www.hwbot.org/result.do?resultId=633337 fixed This score looks like a regular FX5200 ... not a FX5200SEMaybe i'm wrong. Can some moderator ask for a gpu-z or rivatuner screenshot ? http://www.hwbot.org/result.do?resultId=675595 fixed http://www.hwbot.org/compare.do?resultId=675478First it Looks like an fake 8400GS with 128bit memory bus 512MB and 8 Rop`s from Gigabyte but gigabyte doesn`t have such a Card second with near same cpu clock but lower gpu and shader clock he has 9k more in aq3 thats not possible. and here look at these specs same card but an 8500gt seems to me like an strapped rom. Bios and the other specs like 512mb default clock are the same as above but it is an 8500gt!! http://www.hwbot.org/compare.do?resultId=675570 fixed These users have a X1300 with 256MB instead of 128MB! 1. http://www.hwbot.org/result.do?resultId=610037 2. http://www.hwbot.org/result.do?resultId=618238 This is the Futuremark Link for the result: 1. http://service.futuremark.com/compare?3dm05=3098321 2. http://service.futuremark.com/compare?3dm06=1704192 This user has no verification link, only a piece of a screenshot, that everyone could have made on it's own: 3. http://www.hwbot.org/result.do?resultId=572186 fixed Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Massman Posted December 15, 2007 Share Posted December 15, 2007 http://www.hwbot.org/compare.do?resultId=670894 no resolution I can see the resolution http://www.hwbot.org/result.do?resultId=661340Result is for FX5900XT, but the category is FX5900 http://www.hwbot.org/result.do?resultId=612529 http://www.hwbot.org/result.do?resultId=668558 Double result Fixed here I go then :its from an email I just received from hwbot-and Im not sure whether it is possible to reply to that e.mail adress. I wasnt aware that running gametests in 3dmark2001 in succesion is forbidden. I ran all the game tests one by one,with a 30sec. pause between for cooling down vga, which in the end got me a valid result ,no? anyway, i apologize once again if I misplaced this reply... Fixed Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Bwanasoft Posted December 15, 2007 Share Posted December 15, 2007 muahhhhh at the moment you have more work like me Massmann ??? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
klopcha Posted December 15, 2007 Share Posted December 15, 2007 Massman: Do not forget about my last post! Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Ivan1981 Posted December 15, 2007 Share Posted December 15, 2007 These scores from johncjs does't have any information on gpu and cpu. http://www.hwbot.org/result.do?resultId=676466 http://www.hwbot.org/result.do?resultId=675423 http://www.hwbot.org/result.do?resultId=676468 - and this score is too high(SLI maybe?) And this score has invalid futuremark link http://www.hwbot.org/result.do?resultId=635889 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
onni Posted December 16, 2007 Share Posted December 16, 2007 Does't have any information on gpu and cpu.looks like 1650 ddr3 or xt?with amd cpu mor 3000 point in 3dmark 06? http://www.hwbot.org/compare.do?resultId=670212 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Massman Posted December 16, 2007 Share Posted December 16, 2007 Does't have any information on gpu and cpu.looks like 1650 ddr3 or xt?with amd cpu mor 3000 point in 3dmark 06? http://www.hwbot.org/compare.do?resultId=670212 Fixed These scores from johncjs does't have any information on gpu and cpu.http://www.hwbot.org/result.do?resultId=676466 http://www.hwbot.org/result.do?resultId=675423 http://www.hwbot.org/result.do?resultId=676468 - and this score is too high(SLI maybe?) And this score has invalid futuremark link http://www.hwbot.org/result.do?resultId=635889 Fixed Massman: Do not forget about my last post! I do my best, will take a look at it asap . Thanks for the heads up !! muahhhhh at the moment you have more work like me Massmann ??? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
71proste Posted December 16, 2007 Share Posted December 16, 2007 http://www.hwbot.org/compare.do?resultId=667313 no resolution http://www.hwbot.org/compare.do?resultId=664828 no resolution http://www.hwbot.org/compare.do?resultId=666769 no resolution http://www.hwbot.org/compare.do?resultId=666767 no resolution http://www.hwbot.org/compare.do?resultId=666768 no resolution http://www.hwbot.org/compare.do?resultId=657405 no resolution http://www.hwbot.org/compare.do?resultId=675979 wrong resolution http://www.hwbot.org/compare.do?resultId=676508 joke :E Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Massman Posted December 17, 2007 Share Posted December 17, 2007 http://www.hwbot.org/compare.do?resultId=667313 no resolutionhttp://www.hwbot.org/compare.do?resultId=664828 no resolution http://www.hwbot.org/compare.do?resultId=666769 no resolution http://www.hwbot.org/compare.do?resultId=666767 no resolution http://www.hwbot.org/compare.do?resultId=666768 no resolution http://www.hwbot.org/compare.do?resultId=657405 no resolution http://www.hwbot.org/compare.do?resultId=675979 wrong resolution http://www.hwbot.org/compare.do?resultId=676508 joke :E Fixed Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Massman Posted December 17, 2007 Share Posted December 17, 2007 http://www.hwbot.org/compare.do?resultId=663868 need more proofhttp://www.hwbot.org/compare.do?resultId=666195 need more proof,no card name http://www.hwbot.org/compare.do?resultId=658273 no resolution http://www.hwbot.org/compare.do?resultId=667313 no resolution http://www.hwbot.org/compare.do?resultId=664828 no resolution http://www.hwbot.org/compare.do?resultId=666769 no resolution http://www.hwbot.org/compare.do?resultId=666767 no resolution http://www.hwbot.org/compare.do?resultId=666768 no resolutio http://www.hwbot.org/compare.do?resultId=661352 project is not valid http://www.hwbot.org/compare.do?resultId=657405 no resolution http://www.hwbot.org/compare.do?resultId=675351 wrong resolution,should be 1280/1024 http://www.hwbot.org/compare.do?resultId=670942 wrong resolution,should be 1280/1024 Fixed, did 45% of klopcha's post Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
71proste Posted December 17, 2007 Share Posted December 17, 2007 http://www.hwbot.org/compare.do?resultId=675486 wrong resolution Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
CuB3 Posted December 17, 2007 Share Posted December 17, 2007 This user is definitely cheating somehow, he has DDR1 Memory at 400MHz, an Opteron clocked at 3GHz and a X1950 Pro clocked at 635 / 709 and has 7554 3D Marks in 3DMark06. Impossible! http://www.hwbot.org/result.do?resultId=665260 I made a Bench by myself with E6700 @ 3,6GHz, Dual DDR2 @ 920MHz and the same Graphics Card X1950 Pro @ 645 / 820 and get 5800 3D Marks, so the user listed above cannot get more than 2800 3DMarks with such a crappy Hardware! Besides: Almost all Users in the list "Benchmarking -> Benchmark Results -> Search -> 3DMark 06 + X1950 Pro 256 Single" has NO verification Link to Futuremark! Only Images, that could be made with Paint and some "Verification Links" to HWBot itself! Futuremark Verification Links should be necessary to submit a result! Regards, CuB3 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
mikiiioo Posted December 17, 2007 Share Posted December 17, 2007 should be 1280/1024 not 1024/768 thats why place with resolution is not visible,i think so..... Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
71proste Posted December 17, 2007 Share Posted December 17, 2007 CuB3 take it easy mate I don't belive it,isn't so bad yet.Check the resolution Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
71proste Posted December 18, 2007 Share Posted December 18, 2007 http://www.hwbot.org/compare.do?resultId=677223 this result was blocked already,but is on the top again,what is wrong???wrong resolution,should be 1280/1024 not 1024/768 http://www.hwbot.org/compare.do?resultId=676279 resolution not visible http://www.hwbot.org/compare.do?resultId=675929 wrong resolution again http://www.hwbot.org/compare.do?resultId=648594 name of card missing http://www.hwbot.org/compare.do?resultId=625871 name of card missing http://www.hwbot.org/compare.do?resultId=629564 name of card missing http://www.hwbot.org/compare.do?resultId=599323 wrong screen http://www.hwbot.org/compare.do?resultId=610133 resolution not visible Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
klopcha Posted December 18, 2007 Share Posted December 18, 2007 The user registers identical results: http://hwbot.org/result.do?resultId=677498 and http://hwbot.org/result.do?resultId=673245 ; http://hwbot.org/result.do?resultId=677481 and http://hwbot.org/result.do?resultId=677482 . The user has FX5200 SE only now. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Ivan1981 Posted December 18, 2007 Share Posted December 18, 2007 http://www.hwbot.org/result.do?resultId=675099 - again picture without any information.As I can see on any picture he submit he didn't show memory/gpu clock of the card. http://www.hwbot.org/result.do?resultId=676464 - and score too high(and look the scores with 7300gt ddr3 in aquamark with much higher clocks and better cpu and they have similar score). See for example: http://www.hwbot.org/result.do?resultId=625681 (which is ok score) - he has a way better cpu and 10MHz more for core, and 60 MHz less for memory, and a score more than 10% less then johncsj's score. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
VovaN Posted December 18, 2007 Share Posted December 18, 2007 http://www.hwbot.org/result.do?resultId=672632 - disable post-processing Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
lunatic@98 Posted December 19, 2007 Share Posted December 19, 2007 pleace check this http://www.hwbot.org/result.do?resultId=677400 I can´t see the resolution on this micro Picture (3D06 Advanted Edition) http://www.hwbot.org/result.do?resultId=677811 no resolution (3D05 prof Edition) http://www.hwbot.org/result.do?resultId=677405 no resolution (3D03 prof Edition) http://www.hwbot.org/result.do?resultId=677748 need more proof of the screen http://www.hwbot.org/result.do?resultId=676554 and http://www.hwbot.org/result.do?resultId=676845 the same user with same card http://www.hwbot.org/result.do?resultId=675509 no resolution Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Nazar Posted December 19, 2007 Share Posted December 19, 2007 http://www.hwbot.org/result.do?resultId=678045 So, 3-SLI allowed or not? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
VovaN Posted December 19, 2007 Share Posted December 19, 2007 http://www.hwbot.org/result.do?resultId=672632 - disable post-processing. Please remove this result!!! Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
maxine Posted December 19, 2007 Share Posted December 19, 2007 No link, No image....please remove http://www.hwbot.org/result.do?resultId=640561 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
demiurg Posted December 20, 2007 Share Posted December 20, 2007 Please, tell us about 3-way SLi. When it will be authorized? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts