MaSell Posted December 27, 2007 Share Posted December 27, 2007 http://hwbot.org/result.do?resultId=676575 hidded resolution http://hwbot.org/result.do?resultId=676573 hidded resolution Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
gradus Posted December 27, 2007 Share Posted December 27, 2007 http://www.hwbot.org/result.do?resultId=679849 not real on E4400 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
gradus Posted December 27, 2007 Share Posted December 27, 2007 MaSell (Team OCX) GeForce 6600 DDR3 in GeForce 6600 DDR http://www.hwbot.org/result.do?resultId=669200 http://www.hwbot.org/result.do?resultId=653290 http://www.hwbot.org/result.do?resultId=656680 http://www.hwbot.org/result.do?resultId=653616 http://www.hwbot.org/result.do?resultId=654282 http://www.hwbot.org/result.do?resultId=656671 http://www.hwbot.org/result.do?resultId=669202 http://www.hwbot.org/result.do?resultId=656672 Hipo (United Team of Poland) GeForce 6600 DDR3 in GeForce 6600 DDR http://www.hwbot.org/result.do?resultId=526339 http://www.hwbot.org/result.do?resultId=500616 Vatos_locos (OutOfSpecs.Gr) GeForce 6600 DDR3 in GeForce 6600 DDR http://www.hwbot.org/result.do?resultId=650657 P.A.S.S.A.T (Crazy-OC Germany) Cheat http://www.hwbot.org/result.do?resultId=637950 not real on Processor: Xeon 3070 @ 2666mhz on h2o Videocard: GeForce 6600 DDR @ 551/351mhz on h2 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
MaSell Posted December 27, 2007 Share Posted December 27, 2007 MaSell (Team OCX)GeForce 6600 DDR3 in GeForce 6600 DDR http://www.hwbot.org/result.do?resultId=669200 http://www.hwbot.org/result.do?resultId=653290 http://www.hwbot.org/result.do?resultId=656680 http://www.hwbot.org/result.do?resultId=653616 http://www.hwbot.org/result.do?resultId=654282 http://www.hwbot.org/result.do?resultId=656671 http://www.hwbot.org/result.do?resultId=669202 http://www.hwbot.org/result.do?resultId=656672 Those scores was added to good category, but moved by hwbot team Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Bwanasoft Posted December 27, 2007 Share Posted December 27, 2007 not moved i add last week the 6600 DDR3 and now we must sort the entries Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
dracosc Posted December 27, 2007 Share Posted December 27, 2007 I made a mistake and instead of posting Sandra Arithmetic score, i posted Multi-Media score. How do i delete it? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
killer55555 Posted December 27, 2007 Share Posted December 27, 2007 http://www.hwbot.org/result.do?resultId=601748 http://www.hwbot.org/result.do?resultId=601749 http://www.hwbot.org/result.do?resultId=601746 http://www.hwbot.org/result.do?resultId=601745 All this benchs are wrong.They don't have anything Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
PowerToTheUsers Posted December 27, 2007 Share Posted December 27, 2007 The results of giorgios th. in the Xeon 5130 category (http://www.hwbot.org/quickSearch.do?hardwareId=CPU_1259) have been reported before. They ARE falsely matched, despite what CPU-Z says. I can't report this through the normal way as it's grayed out ("This result has been moderated by the wbot crew, and can no longer be reported.").If you look at his CPU-Z screen (http://www.hwbot.org/signature.img?iid=34354&thumb=false), you can see the cpuid is 6-F-A, 6-F-E1. Furthermore this chip has a multiplier of 10, with a FSB of 200MHz. If you look at the other Xeon 5130's, you will see they have cpuid 6-F-6, 6-F-B2. Older samples had Revision A1, but there's no revision E1 like giorgios th. has. Furthermore: Xeon 5130 has a multiplier of 6x, and a FSB of 333MHz. If you take a look at the T7300-category (like CPU-Z detects it...), you will see these CPUs do have cpuid 6-F-A, 6-F-E1, and a multiplier of 10x with the default FSB of 200MHz. So please move * http://www.hwbot.org/result.do?resultId=635085 * http://www.hwbot.org/result.do?resultId=635086 * http://www.hwbot.org/result.do?resultId=635089 * http://www.hwbot.org/result.do?resultId=621962 * http://www.hwbot.org/result.do?resultId=635434 * http://www.hwbot.org/result.do?resultId=635091 to the right category... And another one (also reported before, even twice, but never looked into...) The result in http://www.hwbot.org/result.do?resultId=645676 is a Pentium4 631, check the CPUID. It corresponds to the CPUID of http://www.hwbot.org/signature.img?iid=22841&thumb=false. The user probably knew this, check the title of MSPaint in his taskbar... Furthermore you can see it's a s775-desktopboard, and the Xeon 5060 is a socket 771-CPU. bump... Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
dracosc Posted December 27, 2007 Share Posted December 27, 2007 http://www.hwbot.org/result.do?resultId=680937 This is my wrong Sandra score! Please delete it! Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
mikiiioo Posted December 28, 2007 Share Posted December 28, 2007 sandra is not allowed Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Patagonian Posted December 30, 2007 Share Posted December 30, 2007 Hello try to solve this problem, any post anything and give points ... This is a problem, the report over three times and have not done anything . http://www.hwbot.org/compare.do?resultId=681581 http://www.hwbot.org/compare.do?resultId=681582 http://www.hwbot.org/compare.do?resultId=680635 http://www.hwbot.org/compare.do?resultId=680978 http://www.hwbot.org/compare.do?resultId=681443 http://www.hwbot.org/compare.do?resultId=680179 http://www.hwbot.org/result.do?resultId=609284 http://www.hwbot.org/result.do?resultId=579758 http://www.hwbot.org/result.do?resultId=635774 http://www.hwbot.org/result.do?resultId=635779 Etc..... Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Seewolf Posted December 30, 2007 Share Posted December 30, 2007 Hi, please can you check this result: http://www.hwbot.org/result.do?resultId=606860 I think the time is to fast, because I need ~41s and a lot of others 43-41 too, and he is 10 seconds faster with only a little bit more clock. thx Seewolf Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Bwanasoft Posted December 30, 2007 Share Posted December 30, 2007 thats right, i ask about more Proof Only what i see it´s a diffrent version of PiFast, but 10 seconds with 100 mhz more - i think no. i will check it. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
TASOS Posted December 30, 2007 Share Posted December 30, 2007 Hi, please can you check this result: http://www.hwbot.org/result.do?resultId=606860 I think the time is to fast, because I need ~41s and a lot of others 43-41 too, and he is 10 seconds faster with only a little bit more clock. thx Seewolf This is pifast version 4.3 The result must be deleted. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
71proste Posted December 31, 2007 Share Posted December 31, 2007 http://www.hwbot.org/compare.do?resultId=678463 sli score in single kategorie Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
TASOS Posted December 31, 2007 Share Posted December 31, 2007 Please fix these results.... 2nd place ... but bronze cup & points http://www.hwbot.org/result.do?resultId=647193 3rd place ... but silver cup & points http://www.hwbot.org/result.do?resultId=657132 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
killer55555 Posted January 1, 2008 Share Posted January 1, 2008 http://www.hwbot.org/result.do?resultId=601748 http://www.hwbot.org/result.do?resultId=601746 http://www.hwbot.org/result.do?resultId=601749 http://www.hwbot.org/result.do?resultId=571662 http://www.hwbot.org/result.do?resultId=576682 http://www.hwbot.org/result.do?resultId=573649 http://www.hwbot.org/result.do?resultId=561822 http://www.hwbot.org/result.do?resultId=576508 http://www.hwbot.org/result.do?resultId=591518 http://www.hwbot.org/result.do?resultId=609920 http://www.hwbot.org/result.do?resultId=545647 http://www.hwbot.org/result.do?resultId=511193 Lots of them doesn't have screenshot or links and others are invalid.Please fix it. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
harleybro Posted January 2, 2008 Share Posted January 2, 2008 I question this users AM3 results. I just ran a 7200GS 128MB card with a QX9650 at 4550mhz card at 620/900 the result was just over 35k with DDR3 58K is not possible. http://www.hwbot.org/user.do?userId=12191 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
klopcha Posted January 2, 2008 Share Posted January 2, 2008 I question this users AM3 results. I just ran a 7200GS 128MB card with a QX9650 at 4550mhz card at 620/900 the result was just over 35k with DDR3 58K is not possible. http://www.hwbot.org/user.do?userId=12191 I agree. All results of the user are incorrect. Example: http://www.hwbot.org/result.do?resultId=670450 Result on 7950GT, but category 7600GT. http://www.hwbot.org/result.do?resultId=672090 The videocard is not specified. http://www.hwbot.org/result.do?resultId=677698 The CPU is not specified. All AM3 results very strange. http://www.hwbot.org/result.do?resultId=640318 Unreal result, because extreme overclock X700 Pro (http://www.hwbot.org/result.do?resultId=630421) has 11109 marks. http://www.hwbot.org/result.do?resultId=651255 Result on Celeron M 350, but category Celeron s478 350. http://www.hwbot.org/result.do?resultId=606217 Result on Celeron M 350, but category Celeron s478 350. http://www.hwbot.org/result.do?resultId=512329 Result on Celeron M 350, but category Celeron s478 350. http://www.hwbot.org/result.do?resultId=606220 Result on Celeron M 350, but category Celeron s478 350. http://www.hwbot.org/result.do?resultId=607257 Result on Celeron M 350, but category Celeron s478 350. http://www.hwbot.org/result.do?resultId=632987 Result on Celeron 320, but category Celeron 2.4 Ghz. http://www.hwbot.org/result.do?resultId=672320 Screenshot is wrong. http://www.hwbot.org/result.do?resultId=574048 Result on Celeron 320, but category Celeron 2.4 Ghz. http://www.hwbot.org/result.do?resultId=601228 Error in computation. http://www.hwbot.org/result.do?resultId=667106 Result on Celeron 320, but category Celeron 2.4 Ghz. http://www.hwbot.org/result.do?resultId=574053 Result on Celeron 320, but category Celeron 2.4 Ghz. http://www.hwbot.org/result.do?resultId=666501 Result on Celeron 320, but category Celeron 2.4 Ghz. http://www.hwbot.org/result.do?resultId=574813 CPU-Z is not shown. http://www.hwbot.org/result.do?resultId=594889 Correct result 75 seconds , instead of 115 seconds. http://www.hwbot.org/result.do?resultId=571520 Cheksum invalid. http://www.hwbot.org/result.do?resultId=577373 Cheksum invalid. http://www.hwbot.org/result.do?resultId=577372 Cheksum invalid. http://www.hwbot.org/result.do?resultId=632688 Result on Celeron 320, but category Celeron 2.4 Ghz. http://www.hwbot.org/result.do?resultId=574286 Result on Celeron 320 WPrime 1024Mb, but category Celeron 2.4 Ghz WPrime 32Mb. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
71proste Posted January 3, 2008 Share Posted January 3, 2008 http://www.hwbot.org/compare.do?resultId=657405 no resolution http://www.hwbot.org/compare.do?resultId=656420 no resolution Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
mache Posted January 3, 2008 Share Posted January 3, 2008 http://www.hwbot.org/result.do?resultId=682979 http://www.hwbot.org/result.do?resultId=682998 9700 mobility instead of hd 2400 mobility Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
DopeLex Posted January 3, 2008 Share Posted January 3, 2008 http://www.hwbot.org/result.do?resultId=682979http://www.hwbot.org/result.do?resultId=682998 9700 mobility instead of hd 2400 mobility inversely -> hd 2400 mobility instead of 9700 mobility Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
klopcha Posted January 3, 2008 Share Posted January 3, 2008 http://www.hwbot.org/result.do?resultId=683577 Resolution is not show http://www.hwbot.org/result.do?resultId=683557 Resolution is not show http://www.hwbot.org/result.do?resultId=634247 Resolution is not show http://www.hwbot.org/result.do?resultId=634730 Resolution is not show http://www.hwbot.org/result.do?resultId=634716 Resolution is not show http://hwbot.org/result.do?resultId=682673 Result on socket 939, but category 754. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
harleybro Posted January 4, 2008 Share Posted January 4, 2008 I think both of these users results should be looked into for AM3. Unusual for two members of same team to have results for a 7200GS 64mb, 128, and a 256 and all only in AM3. Also both have at least one extremely skewed result. One over 58k and another over 62k on a 64mb card? http://www.hwbot.org/user.do?userId=10009 http://www.hwbot.org/user.do?userId=12191 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
71proste Posted January 4, 2008 Share Posted January 4, 2008 http://www.hwbot.org/compare.do?resultId=680318 joke:D http://www.hwbot.org/compare.do?resultId=594886 project is not valid http://www.hwbot.org/compare.do?resultId=592868 no resolution http://www.hwbot.org/compare.do?resultId=583902 no verification first two places same guy!! http://hwbot.org/searchResults.do?direction=&applicationId=1&teamId=0&userName=&gpu=GeForce+7900+GTX+%281165%29&cpu=&chipset=&model=&manufacturer=&minScore=&maxScore=&gpuId=741&cpuId=0&chipsetId=0&modelId=0&manufacturerId=0&offset=0&displayAdvanced=false&countryId=0&dateFrom=&dateUntil=&minGpuCoreFreq=&maxGpuCoreFreq=&minGpuMemFreq=&maxGpuMemFreq=&minCpuFreq=&maxCpuFreq=&system=&minTotalPoints= Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts