gradus Posted January 4, 2008 Share Posted January 4, 2008 GeForce 7600 GS DDR2Damikor - Cheater, all results on cheater driver. http://www.hwbot.org/result.do?resultId=670589 nature not real http://www.hwbot.org/result.do?resultId=670590 WoF 700+))) http://www.hwbot.org/result.do?resultId=670591 http://www.hwbot.org/result.do?resultId=670592 http://www.hwbot.org/result.do?resultId=670593 http://www.hwbot.org/result.do?resultId=641930 SLI? ddr3? cpu (Core 2 E6300 (1.86G... @ 2730mhz on air) and 17173 marks is LOL. http://www.hwbot.org/result.do?resultId=668487 DDR3 Galaxy 7600GS Zalman 256MB(792(729)/1840)/vmod http://www.hwbot.org/result.do?resultId=624332 DDR3 or not 7600...Processor: Core 2 E4300 @ 3150mhz...140k LOL))) GeForce 8500 GT DDR2 512 Mb DeathRO (ROClockers Benching Team) all results on cheaters drivers by GOZ http://www.hwbot.org/result.do?resultId=675193 http://www.hwbot.org/result.do?resultId=675199 http://www.hwbot.org/result.do?resultId=675207 http://www.hwbot.org/result.do?resultId=675571 http://www.hwbot.org/result.do?resultId=675215 http://www.hwbot.org/result.do?resultId=679849 not real on E4400 MaSell (Team OCX) GeForce 6600 DDR3 in GeForce 6600 DDR http://www.hwbot.org/result.do?resultId=669200 http://www.hwbot.org/result.do?resultId=653290 http://www.hwbot.org/result.do?resultId=656680 http://www.hwbot.org/result.do?resultId=653616 http://www.hwbot.org/result.do?resultId=654282 http://www.hwbot.org/result.do?resultId=656671 http://www.hwbot.org/result.do?resultId=669202 http://www.hwbot.org/result.do?resultId=656672 Hipo (United Team of Poland) GeForce 6600 DDR3 in GeForce 6600 DDR http://www.hwbot.org/result.do?resultId=526339 http://www.hwbot.org/result.do?resultId=500616 Vatos_locos (OutOfSpecs.Gr) GeForce 6600 DDR3 in GeForce 6600 DDR http://www.hwbot.org/result.do?resultId=650657 P.A.S.S.A.T (Crazy-OC Germany) Cheat http://www.hwbot.org/result.do?resultId=637950 not real on Processor: Xeon 3070 @ 2666mhz on h2o Videocard: GeForce 6600 DDR @ 551/351mhz on h2 !!!!!! Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
TASOS Posted January 4, 2008 Share Posted January 4, 2008 Please fix these results.... 2nd place ... but bronze cup & points http://www.hwbot.org/result.do?resultId=647193 3rd place ... but silver cup & points http://www.hwbot.org/result.do?resultId=657132 UP ... Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
o polonos Posted January 4, 2008 Share Posted January 4, 2008 UP ... 1st link are ok to me Hardware Rank: 3rd Pentium M 440 Celeron = bronze medal 2nd link too Hardware Rank: 2nd Pentium M 440 Celeron = silver medal Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Massman Posted January 4, 2008 Share Posted January 4, 2008 Sorry to not have fixed these, but I'm in the middle of my exams and I still have a lot to do. will try to fix this asap. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
TASOS Posted January 5, 2008 Share Posted January 5, 2008 1st link are ok to me Hardware Rank: 3rd Pentium M 440 Celeron = bronze medal 2nd link too Hardware Rank: 2nd Pentium M 440 Celeron = silver medal Sorry,maybe i didnt described it clearly. I have 1867.00 submitted on 16/09/2007 and i am 3rd http://www.hwbot.org/result.do?resultId=647193 "Kszonek" has 1866.80 submitted on 17/10/2007 and he's 2nd http://www.hwbot.org/result.do?resultId=657132 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
RAH Posted January 6, 2008 Share Posted January 6, 2008 Here are a few to check. http://www.hwbot.org/result.do?resultId=642574 Device ID = 0X9588 This is a HD 2600XT not a PRO. http://www.hwbot.org/result.do?resultId=649344 Clearly shows in Riva its a HD 2600XT http://www.hwbot.org/result.do?resultId=642575 Device ID = 0X9588 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
jowi69 Posted January 6, 2008 Share Posted January 6, 2008 http://www.hwbot.org/result.do?resultId=684834 Result on CF not single card Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
RAH Posted January 6, 2008 Share Posted January 6, 2008 These look odd. http://www.hwbot.org/result.do?resultId=640343 Nothing matches FM link shows P4 333 FSB - would need a 13 divider - E6850 doesn't have. http://www.hwbot.org/result.do?resultId=677781 FM link show P4 Can't see card type in AMD Clock. 975 Core speed - 2600XT ?? http://service.futuremark.com/compare?2k1=9249190 FM link shows P4 No way to confirm card. http://www.hwbot.org/result.do?resultId=649345 Mark clearly shows as HD 2600XT - IN PRO http://www.hwbot.org/result.do?resultId=642574 Device ID 0X9588 (Bn:4, DN:0) - 2600 XT - could be CF - in PRO http://www.hwbot.org/result.do?resultId=649344 Clearly shows as 2600XT in PRO http://www.hwbot.org/result.do?resultId=642575 Device ID 0x9588 (BN:4, Dn:0) - XT - CF?? in PRO One other thing I have noticed. Would like some opinions on. A lot of people using GPU-ID have "Unknown" in subvendor. Modding a card with new bios, Voltmod, etc, doesn't bother me. Good for them, they can do more then I can. But if this "unknown" is caused by putting say a HD 2600PRo bios on a HD 2600XT card, to make it a PRO, I consider this cheating. You? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Ivan1981 Posted January 6, 2008 Share Posted January 6, 2008 I saw this, but I have Palit 2600pro(with ddr3 memory) card and in GPU-Z i have also unknown subvendor.I hope that new GPU-Z will recognize it.I don't know is sapphire have subvendor(but I'm sure that have), because I could change it for sapphire card because fan on the palit is became annoying. Also as I know 2600xt have higher clock then 2600pro with ddr3 memory(600(palit) or 700(sapphire) ->800 MHz for gpu and 1400(700)->1600MHz(800) for memory), and if you see much greater clock thean default you can be suspicious, but as I know volmod on palit and sapphire could be done by pencil and higher clock could be easily achieved, and this method is not precise. And, yes putting 2600pro bios on 2600xt card and publish that score as score of 2600pro is cheating. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Bwanasoft Posted January 7, 2008 Share Posted January 7, 2008 P.A.S.S.A.T (Crazy-OC Germany) Cheat http://www.hwbot.org/result.do?resultId=637950 not real on Processor: Xeon 3070 @ 2666mhz on h2o Videocard: GeForce 6600 DDR @ 551/351mhz on h2 have you see the cpu goes with 4 ghz ??? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
gradus Posted January 7, 2008 Share Posted January 7, 2008 P.A.S.S.A.T (Crazy-OC Germany)Cheat http://www.hwbot.org/result.do?resultId=637950 not real on Processor: Xeon 3070 @ 2666mhz on h2o Videocard: GeForce 6600 DDR @ 551/351mhz on h2 have you see the cpu goes with 4 ghz ??? Yes. He post more results in 6600 DDR1 and they was on 6600GT. This result on 6600GT too. You really can't reach 80k in aquamark using 6600 with ddr on such clocks(551/351mhz). Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
TASOS Posted January 7, 2008 Share Posted January 7, 2008 Can you please check this result ? http://www.hwbot.org/result.do?resultId=673623 The total time of 15.5 sec with only 4.9GHZ ... is simply too good to be true. There must be some kind of cheat or bug. You can check all the other results for relevant scores...even from the same user. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Spyrus Posted January 7, 2008 Share Posted January 7, 2008 Yes. He post more results in 6600 DDR1 and they was on 6600GT. This result on 6600GT too. You really can't reach 80k in aquamark using 6600 with ddr on such clocks(551/351mhz). Same goes here it can be real. Wrong cpu and almost 9000 above me which is faaar too long http://www.hwbot.org/result.do?resultId=622931 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
lunatic@98 Posted January 8, 2008 Share Posted January 8, 2008 Same goes here it can be real.Wrong cpu and almost 9000 above me which is faaar too long http://www.hwbot.org/result.do?resultId=622931 is now ok (fixed by user) Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
S_A_V Posted January 9, 2008 Share Posted January 9, 2008 http://hwbot.org/result.do?resultId=676606 no resolution on screen and no orb link http://hwbot.org/result.do?resultId=682834 impossible with only 715MHz GPU clock and any cpu, even with fastest phenom in the world lol http://hwbot.org/result.do?resultId=683225 no resolution on screen and no orb link + impossible with only 749MHz GPU clock and 2250MHz cpu Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
George_o/c Posted January 9, 2008 Share Posted January 9, 2008 Well, for the past month I've noticed several results that look suspicious ... Some of 'em are totally irrational, makes me wanna laugh ! ... 1) http://www.hwbot.org/result.do?resultId=665503 9225 GFX score with a 7200GS 64MB ... That much score seems to be done with a 7600GT or other relevant VGAs ... But not with a 7200GS, for sure 2) http://www.hwbot.org/result.do?resultId=662387 2 x 7200GS on an Asrock P4VM890 ... LoL ! But that mobo has only 1 x PCI Express x16 slot ... How on h3ll did he fit two of 'em there ? And even if it was true (which is obviously not !), he gets only 400 marks more than the above-mentioned score done with the same hardware ? For Christ's shake ! ... I've got more of 'em ... 3) 7200GS 128MB :http://www.hwbot.org/result.do?resultId=684065 Harleybro managed to get 35463 AM3 score, with a QX9650 @ 4.6GHz and a weak 7200GS 128MB @ 622/901 ... Nice score, perfectly rational, if the setup is taken into consideration (Congrats Harleybro btw ! ) http://www.hwbot.org/result.do?resultId=669397 manos444444 manages to get 58485 AM3 score with a P4 3.0GHz @ 3MHz (he is clearly mistaken, 3GHz was what he should write) and a stock 7200GS ... Compare these two scores ... I think manos's score is waaaaaaaaaaaaaaay weird ... (). I think you got it 4) Same guy, again ... http://www.hwbot.org/result.do?resultId=665908 Totally weird 7200GS 256MB AM3 score ... I think that the specific hwbot user, found an easy way of getting points ... Running some AM3 benches with his hardware, uploads the screen shot mentioning that he uses a 7200GS ... all of 'em 64MB, 128MB, 256MB ... Maybe because the number of users benching with a 7200GS is small, thus he though it's an "easy" category ... Not smart enough, I should say ... Especially the SLi setup, with an Asrock mobo that has only one PCI-E x16 slot ... ROFL ! 5) Again ... http://www.hwbot.org/result.do?resultId=676076 Same user ... 9.5k AM3 score with a 5100 Go ? (LOoooOL ) That card performs like 600 GFX score only ... He uses the same core/mem frequencies in all of his entries (400/400) when the correct 5100 Go freqs are 300/600 ... 6) http://www.hwbot.org/result.do?resultId=685758 He has neither a verification image, nor a verification image url, nor a futuremark url ... Therefore, how is his score confirmed ? Moreover he uses an n-Vidia 8800GTX, but his entry is in the 5100 Go category ... That's why the second 3D 01 5100 Go score is 70k lower Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Massman Posted January 9, 2008 Share Posted January 9, 2008 Fixed George Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
George_o/c Posted January 9, 2008 Share Posted January 9, 2008 Massman I edited my post, added two more ... Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
mache Posted January 9, 2008 Share Posted January 9, 2008 My HD2400 Mobility score is still not fixed... Thanks ! Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
TASOS Posted January 9, 2008 Share Posted January 9, 2008 Sorry,maybe i didnt described it clearly. I have 1867.00 submitted on 16/09/2007 and i am 3rd http://www.hwbot.org/result.do?resultId=647193 "Kszonek" has 1866.80 submitted on 17/10/2007 and he's 2nd http://www.hwbot.org/result.do?resultId=657132 Can you please check this result ? http://www.hwbot.org/result.do?resultId=673623 The total time of 15.5 sec with only 4.9GHZ ... is simply too good to be true. There must be some kind of cheat or bug. You can check all the other results for relevant scores...even from the same user. Just a bump up .... Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Massman Posted January 10, 2008 Share Posted January 10, 2008 Fixed place2/3 issue Can it be that your WP32M is not that good? He's hitting 18,5 @ 4.3G as well. Anyway, asked for info Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
mAlkAv!An Posted January 10, 2008 Share Posted January 10, 2008 There's a double entry on ATI 9700 in 3DMark03 http://www.hwbot.org/result.do?resultId=685562 http://www.hwbot.org/result.do?resultId=565023 those 2 results are the same(same screenshot, score, gpu/cpu clock) and were made by 2 members of the same team. Please fix this and/or delete the newer one(01-07-2008) of those entries. edit: guys did the same with 3DMark05 entry ]:-( http://www.hwbot.org/result.do?resultId=565024 http://www.hwbot.org/result.do?resultId=685565 please fix Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
mAlkAv!An Posted January 10, 2008 Share Posted January 10, 2008 My HD2400 Mobility score is still not fixed... Thanks ! @mache, if this is ur own entry why dont you just modify it by urself, or simply delete it and make a new entry in right category(2400mobility)? I would be happy bout this cuz my friend lost his 3rd place this way . Otherwise an admin will need to delete it. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
onni Posted January 10, 2008 Share Posted January 10, 2008 http://www.hwbot.org/compare.do?resultId=686236 http://www.hwbot.org/compare.do?resultId=686160 http://www.hwbot.org/compare.do?resultId=686353 http://www.hwbot.org/compare.do?resultId=686130 http://www.hwbot.org/compare.do?resultId=686206 is not 1600pro 256mb ddr2,is 1600pro 512mb ddr2. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
PowerToTheUsers Posted January 12, 2008 Share Posted January 12, 2008 The results of giorgios th. in the Xeon 5130 category (http://www.hwbot.org/quickSearch.do?hardwareId=CPU_1259) have been reported before. They ARE falsely matched, despite what CPU-Z says. I can't report this through the normal way as it's grayed out ("This result has been moderated by the wbot crew, and can no longer be reported.").If you look at his CPU-Z screen (http://www.hwbot.org/signature.img?iid=34354&thumb=false), you can see the cpuid is 6-F-A, 6-F-E1. Furthermore this chip has a multiplier of 10, with a FSB of 200MHz. If you look at the other Xeon 5130's, you will see they have cpuid 6-F-6, 6-F-B2. Older samples had Revision A1, but there's no revision E1 like giorgios th. has. Furthermore: Xeon 5130 has a multiplier of 6x, and a FSB of 333MHz. If you take a look at the T7300-category (like CPU-Z detects it...), you will see these CPUs do have cpuid 6-F-A, 6-F-E1, and a multiplier of 10x with the default FSB of 200MHz. So please move * http://www.hwbot.org/result.do?resultId=635085 * http://www.hwbot.org/result.do?resultId=635086 * http://www.hwbot.org/result.do?resultId=635089 * http://www.hwbot.org/result.do?resultId=621962 * http://www.hwbot.org/result.do?resultId=635434 * http://www.hwbot.org/result.do?resultId=635091 to the right category... And another one (also reported before, even twice, but never looked into...) The result in http://www.hwbot.org/result.do?resultId=645676 is a Pentium4 631, check the CPUID. It corresponds to the CPUID of http://www.hwbot.org/signature.img?iid=22841&thumb=false. The user probably knew this, check the title of MSPaint in his taskbar... Furthermore you can see it's a s775-desktopboard, and the Xeon 5060 is a socket 771-CPU. Bump... Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts