Wrong Result

SArd · January 12, 2008

Celeron s478 2.8Ghz

http://www.hwbot.org/result.do?resultId=637047

http://www.hwbot.org/result.do?resultId=636798

Turrican · January 12, 2008

you can't see resolution and card on screen. this could be any video card.

need more proof

http://www.hwbot.org/result.do?resultId=685570

|ron · January 13, 2008

MMhhh that guy over@locker886 has stolen my X850XT 3dmark2003 WR:

http://www.hwbot.org/result.do?resultId=567042

As you can see comparing that results on the ORB with mine, that is clearly a bug... he beated me 26.800points to 20.700 with 1ghz less on the cpu and with the vga on air while I was on Dyce on each components...

Just look at the fps in GT3, they're more than twice than mine...

Thanks!

71proste · January 14, 2008

Hi.I found that some of my results r delete from my account without let me know about.I have lost about 27-35points.All results r'nt reported or fake-just missing,dont know why?

1x3place(is back:))

1x2place back

1x2place(still missing)

i found two screens and i've submitted already,but i cant find what else is missing,because i have 190 submitted results.Is any way to find out whats missing?...

thanks

lunatic@98 · January 14, 2008

Should I laugh or cry? I know bench is already from the 28.01.2007, however, some more information in the picture should already be.

In addition, I hardly believe that a T7200 with 2.0 Ghz creates 21.3 in the Superpi 1 mb.

http://www.hwbot.org/result.do?resultId=573115

pleace check this

Thx

RAH · January 14, 2008

Ref Post 891

Still nothing fixed.

aspstein · January 15, 2008

No screenshot and no orb link, score still can be real. But who could know?

http://www.hwbot.org/result.do?resultId=598340

mAlkAv!An · January 15, 2008

Screens say results weren't obtained with Futuremark approved drivers.

3DMark05: http://www.hwbot.org/result.do?resultId=687987

3DMark06: http://www.hwbot.org/result.do?resultId=688008

Espacially 3DMark06 result is way out of line compared to other scores in ATI 9700mobility category, while using much lower clocks.

Please sort this.

DopeLex · January 16, 2008

3DMark06: http://www.hwbot.org/result.do?resultId=688008 -> wrong resolution: 1280x800 instead of 1280 x 1024.

Maybe Monitor doesn't support 1280 x 1024 -> but then: shit happens.

DopeLex · January 16, 2008

No result -> no reasonable Link, no Picture, unrealistic Score for clocks.

http://www.hwbot.org/result.do?resultId=560310

71proste · January 17, 2008

http://www.hwbot.org/compare.do?resultId=688155 no resolution

btw:any news in my case???

DopeLex · January 17, 2008

http://www.hwbot.org/compare.do?resultId=688155 no resolution

btw:any news in my case???

if no standard resolution -> 3DMark06 tells you in Resultscreen.

71proste · January 17, 2008

hmm,not in my version of 3d06

Ivan1981 · January 17, 2008

http://www.hwbot.org/result.do?resultId=660726

Verification link is dead, no picture.

http://www.hwbot.org/result.do?resultId=682889

Wrong category, not radeon 9500 but radeon 3870.

Gotcha · January 18, 2008

http://www.hwbot.org/result.do?resultId=675855

Time incorrect :

Screenshot : 239.544sec

User validate 2min 39sec 540ms

http://www.hwbot.org/result.do?resultId=658613

No url for validation CPUz and screenshot incomplet

http://www.hwbot.org/result.do?resultId=669373

Wrong category , move to "Athlon XP 1900+ Palomino"

71proste · January 19, 2008

http://www.hwbot.org/compare.do?resultId=672966 wrong kategorie,this is 256mb-not 512

http://www.hwbot.org/compare.do?resultId=688996 no resolution

http://www.hwbot.org/compare.do?resultId=688155 need more proof that is 256mb version not 512,no resolution anyway

http://www.hwbot.org/compare.do?resultId=684669 no name of card

http://www.hwbot.org/compare.do?resultId=657405 no resolution

http://www.hwbot.org/compare.do?resultId=656420 no resolution

Massman · January 19, 2008

http://www.hwbot.org/result.do?resultId=677978
http://www.hwbot.org/result.do?resultId=676317

http://www.hwbot.org/result.do?resultId=678495 (CPUZ screen is missing)

http://www.hwbot.org/result.do?resultId=678496 (dubble post)

http://www.hwbot.org/result.do?resultId=675728

http://www.hwbot.org/result.do?resultId=680293

http://www.hwbot.org/result.do?resultId=680465 (no cpuz screen)

http://www.hwbot.org/result.do?resultId=680383 (no cpuz screen)

http://www.hwbot.org/result.do?resultId=680292 (no cpuz screen)

http://www.hwbot.org/result.do?resultId=676174 (no cpuz screen)

The results are with Pentium 3, but category is Pentium 3-E (mobile).

http://www.hwbot.org/result.do?resultId=559487 Athlon 64 2700+ but the category is Athlon XP 2700+

http://www.hwbot.org/result.do?resultId=559831 Athlon XP 2600+ but the category is Athlon XP 2700+

Can you please fix this.

Thanx

To Massman
i made small mistake this is sli result in single kategorie:

http://www.hwbot.org/compare.do?resultId=545593'>http://www.hwbot.org/compare.do?resultId=545593

and already removed:

http://www.hwbot.org/compare.do?resultId=612881

please put it back(Sergey13's score) and block that one: http://www.hwbot.org/compare.do?resultId=545593

http://www.hwbot.org/compare.do?resultId=648594 no name of card

The user has FX5200 SE only now!
http://www.hwbot.org/result.do?resultId=673245 Result on FX5200SE but category FX5200.

http://www.hwbot.org/result.do?resultId=677481 Result on FX5200SE but category FX5200.

http://www.hwbot.org/result.do?resultId=676393 Result on 8800GT but category Radeon 8500.

http://www.hwbot.org/result.do?resultId=679453
542 fps in mother nature - bugged run?

This was done with a G92 card not a 8800 GTS 640 Mb. Wrong section.

http://www.hwbot.org/result.do?resultId=679707

The results of giorgios th. in the Xeon 5130 category (http://www.hwbot.org/quickSearch.do?hardwareId=CPU_1259) have been reported before. They ARE falsely matched, despite what CPU-Z says. I can't report this through the normal way as it's grayed out ("This result has been moderated by the wbot crew, and can no longer be reported.").
If you look at his CPU-Z screen (http://www.hwbot.org/signature.img?iid=34354&thumb=false), you can see the cpuid is 6-F-A, 6-F-E1. Furthermore this chip has a multiplier of 10, with a FSB of 200MHz.

If you look at the other Xeon 5130's, you will see they have cpuid 6-F-6, 6-F-B2. Older samples had Revision A1, but there's no revision E1 like giorgios th. has. Furthermore: Xeon 5130 has a multiplier of 6x, and a FSB of 333MHz.

If you take a look at the T7300-category (like CPU-Z detects it...), you will see these CPUs do have cpuid 6-F-A, 6-F-E1, and a multiplier of 10x with the default FSB of 200MHz.

So please move

* http://www.hwbot.org/result.do?resultId=635085

* http://www.hwbot.org/result.do?resultId=635086

* http://www.hwbot.org/result.do?resultId=635089

* http://www.hwbot.org/result.do?resultId=621962

* http://www.hwbot.org/result.do?resultId=635434

* http://www.hwbot.org/result.do?resultId=635091

to the right category...

And another one (also reported before, even twice, but never looked into...)

The result in http://www.hwbot.org/result.do?resultId=645676 is a Pentium4 631, check the CPUID. It corresponds to the CPUID of http://www.hwbot.org/signature.img?iid=22841&thumb=false. The user probably knew this, check the title of MSPaint in his taskbar... Furthermore you can see it's a s775-desktopboard, and the Xeon 5060 is a socket 771-CPU.

@Bwanasoft

The result below should be unblocked and moved to the correct category.

It has a valid FM link ... and the description (bot tags) in the forum post is correct.

It's a bot missmatch

http://www.hwbot.org/result.do?resultId=679684

FM link dead.
No resolution

No vga info

http://www.hwbot.org/result.do?resultId=642626

Just a screenshot in forumpost

No FM link

No resolution

No vga info

http://www.hwbot.org/result.do?resultId=610962

GeForce 7600 GS DDR2
Damikor - Cheater, all results on cheater driver.

http://www.hwbot.org/result.do?resultId=670589 nature not real

http://www.hwbot.org/result.do?resultId=670590 WoF 700+)))

http://www.hwbot.org/result.do?resultId=670591

http://www.hwbot.org/result.do?resultId=670592

http://www.hwbot.org/result.do?resultId=670593

http://www.hwbot.org/result.do?resultId=641930 SLI? ddr3? cpu (Core 2 E6300 (1.86G... @ 2730mhz on air) and 17173 marks is LOL.

http://www.hwbot.org/result.do?resultId=668487 DDR3

Galaxy 7600GS Zalman 256MB(792(729)/1840)/vmod

http://www.hwbot.org/result.do?resultId=624332 DDR3 or not 7600...Processor: Core 2 E4300 @ 3150mhz...140k LOL)))

http://www.hwbot.org/result.do?resultId=679849
not real on E4400

http://hwbot.org/result.do?resultId=676575 hidded resolution
http://hwbot.org/result.do?resultId=676573 hidded resolution

GeForce 8500 GT DDR2 512 Mb
DeathRO (ROClockers Benching Team)

all results on cheaters drivers by GOZ

http://www.hwbot.org/result.do?resultId=675193

http://www.hwbot.org/result.do?resultId=675199

http://www.hwbot.org/result.do?resultId=675207

http://www.hwbot.org/result.do?resultId=675571

http://www.hwbot.org/result.do?resultId=675215

MaSell (Team OCX)
GeForce 6600 DDR3 in GeForce 6600 DDR

http://www.hwbot.org/result.do?resultId=669200

http://www.hwbot.org/result.do?resultId=653290

http://www.hwbot.org/result.do?resultId=656680

http://www.hwbot.org/result.do?resultId=653616

http://www.hwbot.org/result.do?resultId=654282

http://www.hwbot.org/result.do?resultId=656671

http://www.hwbot.org/result.do?resultId=669202

http://www.hwbot.org/result.do?resultId=656672

Hipo (United Team of Poland)

GeForce 6600 DDR3 in GeForce 6600 DDR

http://www.hwbot.org/result.do?resultId=526339

http://www.hwbot.org/result.do?resultId=500616

Vatos_locos (OutOfSpecs.Gr)

GeForce 6600 DDR3 in GeForce 6600 DDR

http://www.hwbot.org/result.do?resultId=650657

P.A.S.S.A.T (Crazy-OC Germany)

Cheat

http://www.hwbot.org/result.do?resultId=637950

not real on

Processor: Xeon 3070 @ 2666mhz on h2o

Videocard: GeForce 6600 DDR @ 551/351mhz on h2

http://www.hwbot.org/result.do?resultId=601748'>http://www.hwbot.org/result.do?resultId=601748
http://www.hwbot.org/result.do?resultId=601749'>http://www.hwbot.org/result.do?resultId=601749

http://www.hwbot.org/result.do?resultId=601746'>http://www.hwbot.org/result.do?resultId=601746

http://www.hwbot.org/result.do?resultId=601745

All this benchs are wrong.They don't have anything

http://www.hwbot.org/result.do?resultId=680937

This is my wrong Sandra score! Please delete it!

Hello try to solve this problem, any post anything and give points ... This is a problem, the report over three times and have not done anything .

http://www.hwbot.org/compare.do?resultId=681581

http://www.hwbot.org/compare.do?resultId=681582

http://www.hwbot.org/compare.do?resultId=680635

http://www.hwbot.org/compare.do?resultId=680978

http://www.hwbot.org/compare.do?resultId=681443

http://www.hwbot.org/compare.do?resultId=680179

http://www.hwbot.org/result.do?resultId=609284

http://www.hwbot.org/result.do?resultId=579758

http://www.hwbot.org/result.do?resultId=635774

http://www.hwbot.org/result.do?resultId=635779

Etc.....

Hi,

please can you check this result:

http://www.hwbot.org/result.do?resultId=606860

I think the time is to fast, because I need ~41s and a lot of others 43-41 too, and he is 10 seconds faster with only a little bit more clock.

thx

Seewolf

http://www.hwbot.org/compare.do?resultId=678463 sli score in single kategorie

Please fix these results....

2nd place ... but bronze cup & points

http://www.hwbot.org/result.do?resultId=647193

3rd place ... but silver cup & points

http://www.hwbot.org/result.do?resultId=657132

http://www.hwbot.org/result.do?resultId=601748
http://www.hwbot.org/result.do?resultId=601746

http://www.hwbot.org/result.do?resultId=601749

http://www.hwbot.org/result.do?resultId=571662

http://www.hwbot.org/result.do?resultId=576682

http://www.hwbot.org/result.do?resultId=573649

http://www.hwbot.org/result.do?resultId=561822

http://www.hwbot.org/result.do?resultId=576508

http://www.hwbot.org/result.do?resultId=591518

http://www.hwbot.org/result.do?resultId=609920

http://www.hwbot.org/result.do?resultId=545647

http://www.hwbot.org/result.do?resultId=511193

Lots of them doesn't have screenshot or links and others are invalid.Please fix it.

I question this users AM3 results. I just ran a 7200GS 128MB card with a QX9650 at 4550mhz card at 620/900 the result was just over 35k with DDR3 58K is not possible.

http://www.hwbot.org/user.do?userId=12191'>http://www.hwbot.org/user.do?userId=12191

I agree. All results of the user are incorrect.
Example:

http://www.hwbot.org/result.do?resultId=670450 Result on 7950GT, but category 7600GT.

http://www.hwbot.org/result.do?resultId=672090 The videocard is not specified.

http://www.hwbot.org/result.do?resultId=677698 The CPU is not specified.

All AM3 results very strange.

http://www.hwbot.org/result.do?resultId=640318 Unreal result, because extreme overclock X700 Pro (http://www.hwbot.org/result.do?resultId=630421) has 11109 marks.

http://www.hwbot.org/result.do?resultId=651255 Result on Celeron M 350, but category Celeron s478 350.

http://www.hwbot.org/result.do?resultId=606217 Result on Celeron M 350, but category Celeron s478 350.

http://www.hwbot.org/result.do?resultId=512329 Result on Celeron M 350, but category Celeron s478 350.

http://www.hwbot.org/result.do?resultId=606220 Result on Celeron M 350, but category Celeron s478 350.

http://www.hwbot.org/result.do?resultId=607257 Result on Celeron M 350, but category Celeron s478 350.

http://www.hwbot.org/result.do?resultId=632987 Result on Celeron 320, but category Celeron 2.4 Ghz.

http://www.hwbot.org/result.do?resultId=672320 Screenshot is wrong.

http://www.hwbot.org/result.do?resultId=574048 Result on Celeron 320, but category Celeron 2.4 Ghz.

http://www.hwbot.org/result.do?resultId=601228 Error in computation.

http://www.hwbot.org/result.do?resultId=667106 Result on Celeron 320, but category Celeron 2.4 Ghz.

http://www.hwbot.org/result.do?resultId=574053 Result on Celeron 320, but category Celeron 2.4 Ghz.

http://www.hwbot.org/result.do?resultId=666501 Result on Celeron 320, but category Celeron 2.4 Ghz.

http://www.hwbot.org/result.do?resultId=574813 CPU-Z is not shown.

http://www.hwbot.org/result.do?resultId=594889 Correct result 75 seconds , instead of 115 seconds.

http://www.hwbot.org/result.do?resultId=571520 Cheksum invalid.

http://www.hwbot.org/result.do?resultId=577373 Cheksum invalid.

http://www.hwbot.org/result.do?resultId=577372 Cheksum invalid.

http://www.hwbot.org/result.do?resultId=632688 Result on Celeron 320, but category Celeron 2.4 Ghz.

http://www.hwbot.org/result.do?resultId=574286 Result on Celeron 320 WPrime 1024Mb, but category Celeron 2.4 Ghz WPrime 32Mb.

http://www.hwbot.org/compare.do?resultId=657405'>http://www.hwbot.org/compare.do?resultId=657405 no resolution
http://www.hwbot.org/compare.do?resultId=656420'>http://www.hwbot.org/compare.do?resultId=656420 no resolution

http://www.hwbot.org/result.do?resultId=682979
http://www.hwbot.org/result.do?resultId=682998

9700 mobility instead of hd 2400 mobility

http://www.hwbot.org/result.do?resultId=683577 Resolution is not show
http://www.hwbot.org/result.do?resultId=683557 Resolution is not show

http://www.hwbot.org/result.do?resultId=634247 Resolution is not show

http://www.hwbot.org/result.do?resultId=634730 Resolution is not show

http://www.hwbot.org/result.do?resultId=634716 Resolution is not show

http://hwbot.org/result.do?resultId=682673 Result on socket 939, but category 754.

I think both of these users results should be looked into for AM3. Unusual for two members of same team to have results for a 7200GS 64mb, 128, and a 256 and all only in AM3. Also both have at least one extremely skewed result. One over 58k and another over 62k on a 64mb card?

http://www.hwbot.org/user.do?userId=10009

http://www.hwbot.org/user.do?userId=12191

http://www.hwbot.org/compare.do?resultId=680318 joke:D
http://www.hwbot.org/compare.do?resultId=594886 project is not valid

http://www.hwbot.org/compare.do?resultId=592868 no resolution

http://www.hwbot.org/compare.do?resultId=583902 no verification

first two places same guy!!

http://hwbot.org/searchResults.do?direction=&applicationId=1&teamId=0&userName=&gpu=GeForce+7900+GTX+%281165%29&cpu=&chipset=&model=&manufacturer=&minScore=&maxScore=&gpuId=741&cpuId=0&chipsetId=0&modelId=0&manufacturerId=0&offset=0&displayAdvanced=false&countryId=0&dateFrom=&dateUntil=&minGpuCoreFreq=&maxGpuCoreFreq=&minGpuMemFreq=&maxGpuMemFreq=&minCpuFreq=&maxCpuFreq=&system=&minTotalPoints=

Here are a few to check.
http://www.hwbot.org/result.do?resultId=642574

Device ID = 0X9588

This is a HD 2600XT not a PRO.

http://www.hwbot.org/result.do?resultId=649344

Clearly shows in Riva its a HD 2600XT

http://www.hwbot.org/result.do?resultId=642575

Device ID = 0X9588

http://www.hwbot.org/result.do?resultId=684834 Result on CF not single card

Can you please check this result ?

http://www.hwbot.org/result.do?resultId=673623

The total time of 15.5 sec with only 4.9GHZ ... is simply too good to be true.

There must be some kind of cheat or bug.

You can check all the other results for relevant scores...even from the same user.

http://hwbot.org/result.do?resultId=676606
no resolution on screen and no orb link

http://hwbot.org/result.do?resultId=682834

impossible with only 715MHz GPU clock and any cpu, even with fastest phenom in the world lol

http://hwbot.org/result.do?resultId=683225

no resolution on screen and no orb link + impossible with only 749MHz GPU clock and 2250MHz cpu

There's a double entry on ATI 9700 in 3DMark03

http://www.hwbot.org/result.do?resultId=685562

http://www.hwbot.org/result.do?resultId=565023

those 2 results are the same(same screenshot, score, gpu/cpu clock) and were made by 2 members of the same team.

Please fix this and/or delete the newer one(01-07-2008) of those entries.

edit: guys did the same with 3DMark05 entry ]:-(

http://www.hwbot.org/result.do?resultId=565024

http://www.hwbot.org/result.do?resultId=685565

please fix

http://www.hwbot.org/compare.do?resultId=686236
http://www.hwbot.org/compare.do?resultId=686160

http://www.hwbot.org/compare.do?resultId=686353

http://www.hwbot.org/compare.do?resultId=686130

http://www.hwbot.org/compare.do?resultId=686206

is not 1600pro 256mb ddr2,is 1600pro 512mb ddr2.

Celeron s478 2.8Ghz

http://www.hwbot.org/result.do?resultId=637047

http://www.hwbot.org/result.do?resultId=636798

you can't see resolution and card on screen. this could be any video card.
need more proof

http://www.hwbot.org/result.do?resultId=685570

MMhhh that guy over@locker886 has stolen my X850XT 3dmark2003 WR:
http://www.hwbot.org/result.do?resultId=567042

As you can see comparing that results on the ORB with mine, that is clearly a bug... he beated me 26.800points to 20.700 with 1ghz less on the cpu and with the vga on air while I was on Dyce on each components...

Just look at the fps in GT3, they're more than twice than mine...

Thanks!

Should I laugh or cry? I know bench is already from the 28.01.2007, however, some more information in the picture should already be.

In addition, I hardly believe that a T7200 with 2.0 Ghz creates 21.3 in the Superpi 1 mb.

http://www.hwbot.org/result.do?resultId=573115

pleace check this

Thx

No screenshot and no orb link, score still can be real. But who could know?

http://www.hwbot.org/result.do?resultId=598340

Screens say results weren't obtained with Futuremark approved drivers.

3DMark05: http://www.hwbot.org/result.do?resultId=687987

3DMark06: http://www.hwbot.org/result.do?resultId=688008'>http://www.hwbot.org/result.do?resultId=688008

Espacially 3DMark06 result is way out of line compared to other scores in ATI 9700mobility category, while using much lower clocks.

Please sort this.

3DMark06: http://www.hwbot.org/result.do?resultId=688008 -> wrong resolution: 1280x800 instead of 1280 x 1024.

Maybe Monitor doesn't support 1280 x 1024 -> but then: shit happens.

No result -> no reasonable Link, no Picture, unrealistic Score for clocks.

http://www.hwbot.org/result.do?resultId=560310

http://www.hwbot.org/compare.do?resultId=688155'>http://www.hwbot.org/compare.do?resultId=688155 no resolution

btw:any news in my case???

http://www.hwbot.org/result.do?resultId=660726
Verification link is dead, no picture.

http://www.hwbot.org/result.do?resultId=682889

Wrong category, not radeon 9500 but radeon 3870.

http://www.hwbot.org/result.do?resultId=675855
Time incorrect :

Screenshot : 239.544sec

User validate 2min 39sec 540ms

http://www.hwbot.org/result.do?resultId=658613

No url for validation CPUz and screenshot incomplet

http://www.hwbot.org/result.do?resultId=669373

Wrong category , move to "Athlon XP 1900+ Palomino"

http://www.hwbot.org/compare.do?resultId=672966 wrong kategorie,this is 256mb-not 512
http://www.hwbot.org/compare.do?resultId=688996 no resolution

http://www.hwbot.org/compare.do?resultId=688155 need more proof that is 256mb version not 512,no resolution anyway

http://www.hwbot.org/compare.do?resultId=684669 no name of card

http://www.hwbot.org/compare.do?resultId=657405 no resolution

http://www.hwbot.org/compare.do?resultId=656420 no resolution

ALL FIXED

71proste: What has happened exactly? PM me if you will, then I'll look into it