Jump to content
HWBOT Community Forums

Wrong Result

Recommended Posts

  • Replies 1.9k
  • Created
  • Last Reply

Top Posters In This Topic

Top Posters In This Topic

Posted Images

MMhhh that guy over@locker886 has stolen my X850XT 3dmark2003 WR:



As you can see comparing that results on the ORB with mine, that is clearly a bug... he beated me 26.800points to 20.700 with 1ghz less on the cpu and with the vga on air while I was on Dyce on each components...

Just look at the fps in GT3, they're more than twice than mine...


Link to comment
Share on other sites

Hi.I found that some of my results r delete from my account without let me know about.I have lost about 27-35points.All results r'nt reported or fake-just missing,dont know why?

1x3place(is back:))

1x2place back

1x2place(still missing)

i found two screens and i've submitted already,but i cant find what else is missing,because i have 190 submitted results.Is any way to find out whats missing?:)...:)



Link to comment
Share on other sites

Link to comment
Share on other sites



http://www.hwbot.org/result.do?resultId=678495 (CPUZ screen is missing)

http://www.hwbot.org/result.do?resultId=678496 (dubble post)



http://www.hwbot.org/result.do?resultId=680465 (no cpuz screen)

http://www.hwbot.org/result.do?resultId=680383 (no cpuz screen)

http://www.hwbot.org/result.do?resultId=680292 (no cpuz screen)

http://www.hwbot.org/result.do?resultId=676174 (no cpuz screen)


The results are with Pentium 3, but category is Pentium 3-E (mobile).



http://www.hwbot.org/result.do?resultId=559487 Athlon 64 2700+ but the category is Athlon XP 2700+

http://www.hwbot.org/result.do?resultId=559831 Athlon XP 2600+ but the category is Athlon XP 2700+


Can you please fix this.

Thanx :)


To Massman

i made small mistake :) this is sli result in single kategorie:


and already removed:


please put it back(Sergey13's score) and block that one: http://www.hwbot.org/compare.do?resultId=545593


http://www.hwbot.org/compare.do?resultId=648594 no name of card


The user has FX5200 SE only now!

http://www.hwbot.org/result.do?resultId=673245 Result on FX5200SE but category FX5200.

http://www.hwbot.org/result.do?resultId=677481 Result on FX5200SE but category FX5200.


http://www.hwbot.org/result.do?resultId=676393 Result on 8800GT but category Radeon 8500.



542 fps in mother nature - bugged run?


This was done with a G92 card not a 8800 GTS 640 Mb. Wrong section.




The results of giorgios th. in the Xeon 5130 category (http://www.hwbot.org/quickSearch.do?hardwareId=CPU_1259) have been reported before. They ARE falsely matched, despite what CPU-Z says. I can't report this through the normal way as it's grayed out ("This result has been moderated by the wbot crew, and can no longer be reported.").

If you look at his CPU-Z screen (http://www.hwbot.org/signature.img?iid=34354&thumb=false), you can see the cpuid is 6-F-A, 6-F-E1. Furthermore this chip has a multiplier of 10, with a FSB of 200MHz.

If you look at the other Xeon 5130's, you will see they have cpuid 6-F-6, 6-F-B2. Older samples had Revision A1, but there's no revision E1 like giorgios th. has. Furthermore: Xeon 5130 has a multiplier of 6x, and a FSB of 333MHz.

If you take a look at the T7300-category (like CPU-Z detects it...), you will see these CPUs do have cpuid 6-F-A, 6-F-E1, and a multiplier of 10x with the default FSB of 200MHz.

So please move

* http://www.hwbot.org/result.do?resultId=635085

* http://www.hwbot.org/result.do?resultId=635086

* http://www.hwbot.org/result.do?resultId=635089

* http://www.hwbot.org/result.do?resultId=621962

* http://www.hwbot.org/result.do?resultId=635434

* http://www.hwbot.org/result.do?resultId=635091

to the right category...



And another one (also reported before, even twice, but never looked into...)


The result in http://www.hwbot.org/result.do?resultId=645676 is a Pentium4 631, check the CPUID. It corresponds to the CPUID of http://www.hwbot.org/signature.img?iid=22841&thumb=false. The user probably knew this, check the title of MSPaint in his taskbar... Furthermore you can see it's a s775-desktopboard, and the Xeon 5060 is a socket 771-CPU.




The result below should be unblocked and moved to the correct category.

It has a valid FM link ... and the description (bot tags) in the forum post is correct.

It's a bot missmatch



FM link dead.

No resolution

No vga info



Just a screenshot in forumpost

No FM link

No resolution

No vga info



GeForce 7600 GS DDR2

Damikor - Cheater, all results on cheater driver.

http://www.hwbot.org/result.do?resultId=670589 nature not real

http://www.hwbot.org/result.do?resultId=670590 WoF 700+)))





http://www.hwbot.org/result.do?resultId=641930 SLI? ddr3? cpu (Core 2 E6300 (1.86G... @ 2730mhz on air) and 17173 marks is LOL.


http://www.hwbot.org/result.do?resultId=668487 DDR3

Galaxy 7600GS Zalman 256MB(792(729)/1840)/vmod


http://www.hwbot.org/result.do?resultId=624332 DDR3 or not 7600...Processor: Core 2 E4300 @ 3150mhz...140k LOL)))





MaSell (Team OCX)

GeForce 6600 DDR3 in GeForce 6600 DDR










Hipo (United Team of Poland)

GeForce 6600 DDR3 in GeForce 6600 DDR




Vatos_locos (OutOfSpecs.Gr)

GeForce 6600 DDR3 in GeForce 6600 DDR



P.A.S.S.A.T (Crazy-OC Germany)



not real on

Processor: Xeon 3070 @ 2666mhz on h2o

Videocard: GeForce 6600 DDR @ 551/351mhz on h2







All this benchs are wrong.They don't have anything




This is my wrong Sandra score! Please delete it!





please can you check this result:




I think the time is to fast, because I need ~41s and a lot of others 43-41 too, and he is 10 seconds faster with only a little bit more clock.








Please fix these results....


2nd place ... but bronze cup & points



3rd place ... but silver cup & points




I question this users AM3 results. I just ran a 7200GS 128MB card with a QX9650 at 4550mhz card at 620/900 the result was just over 35k with DDR3 58K is not possible.




I agree. All results of the user are incorrect.


http://www.hwbot.org/result.do?resultId=670450 Result on 7950GT, but category 7600GT.

http://www.hwbot.org/result.do?resultId=672090 The videocard is not specified.

http://www.hwbot.org/result.do?resultId=677698 The CPU is not specified.

All AM3 results very strange.


http://www.hwbot.org/result.do?resultId=640318 Unreal result, because extreme overclock X700 Pro (http://www.hwbot.org/result.do?resultId=630421) has 11109 marks.


http://www.hwbot.org/result.do?resultId=651255 Result on Celeron M 350, but category Celeron s478 350.

http://www.hwbot.org/result.do?resultId=606217 Result on Celeron M 350, but category Celeron s478 350.

http://www.hwbot.org/result.do?resultId=512329 Result on Celeron M 350, but category Celeron s478 350.

http://www.hwbot.org/result.do?resultId=606220 Result on Celeron M 350, but category Celeron s478 350.

http://www.hwbot.org/result.do?resultId=607257 Result on Celeron M 350, but category Celeron s478 350.


http://www.hwbot.org/result.do?resultId=632987 Result on Celeron 320, but category Celeron 2.4 Ghz.

http://www.hwbot.org/result.do?resultId=672320 Screenshot is wrong.

http://www.hwbot.org/result.do?resultId=574048 Result on Celeron 320, but category Celeron 2.4 Ghz.

http://www.hwbot.org/result.do?resultId=601228 Error in computation.

http://www.hwbot.org/result.do?resultId=667106 Result on Celeron 320, but category Celeron 2.4 Ghz.

http://www.hwbot.org/result.do?resultId=574053 Result on Celeron 320, but category Celeron 2.4 Ghz.

http://www.hwbot.org/result.do?resultId=666501 Result on Celeron 320, but category Celeron 2.4 Ghz.

http://www.hwbot.org/result.do?resultId=574813 CPU-Z is not shown.

http://www.hwbot.org/result.do?resultId=594889 Correct result 75 seconds , instead of 115 seconds.

http://www.hwbot.org/result.do?resultId=571520 Cheksum invalid.

http://www.hwbot.org/result.do?resultId=577373 Cheksum invalid.

http://www.hwbot.org/result.do?resultId=577372 Cheksum invalid.

http://www.hwbot.org/result.do?resultId=632688 Result on Celeron 320, but category Celeron 2.4 Ghz.

http://www.hwbot.org/result.do?resultId=574286 Result on Celeron 320 WPrime 1024Mb, but category Celeron 2.4 Ghz WPrime 32Mb.


http://www.hwbot.org/compare.do?resultId=657405'>http://www.hwbot.org/compare.do?resultId=657405 no resolution

http://www.hwbot.org/compare.do?resultId=656420'>http://www.hwbot.org/compare.do?resultId=656420 no resolution




I think both of these users results should be looked into for AM3. Unusual for two members of same team to have results for a 7200GS 64mb, 128, and a 256 and all only in AM3. Also both have at least one extremely skewed result. One over 58k and another over 62k on a 64mb card?






Here are a few to check.


Device ID = 0X9588

This is a HD 2600XT not a PRO.


Clearly shows in Riva its a HD 2600XT


Device ID = 0X9588



Can you please check this result ?




The total time of 15.5 sec with only 4.9GHZ ... is simply too good to be true.


There must be some kind of cheat or bug.


You can check all the other results for relevant scores...even from the same user.



no resolution on screen and no orb link



impossible with only 715MHz GPU clock and any cpu, even with fastest phenom in the world lol



no resolution on screen and no orb link + impossible with only 749MHz GPU clock and 2250MHz cpu


There's a double entry on ATI 9700 in 3DMark03





those 2 results are the same(same screenshot, score, gpu/cpu clock) and were made by 2 members of the same team.

Please fix this and/or delete the newer one(01-07-2008) of those entries.



edit: guys did the same with 3DMark05 entry ]:-(





please fix




you can't see resolution and card on screen. this could be any video card.

need more proof ;)




MMhhh that guy over@locker886 has stolen my X850XT 3dmark2003 WR:



As you can see comparing that results on the ORB with mine, that is clearly a bug... he beated me 26.800points to 20.700 with 1ghz less on the cpu and with the vga on air while I was on Dyce on each components...

Just look at the fps in GT3, they're more than twice than mine...



Should I laugh or cry? I know bench is already from the 28.01.2007, however, some more information in the picture should already be.


In addition, I hardly believe that a T7200 with 2.0 Ghz creates 21.3 in the Superpi 1 mb.



pleace check this




No screenshot and no orb link, score still can be real. But who could know?




Screens say results weren't obtained with Futuremark approved drivers.


3DMark05: http://www.hwbot.org/result.do?resultId=687987

3DMark06: http://www.hwbot.org/result.do?resultId=688008'>http://www.hwbot.org/result.do?resultId=688008


Espacially 3DMark06 result is way out of line compared to other scores in ATI 9700mobility category, while using much lower clocks.


Please sort this.


3DMark06: http://www.hwbot.org/result.do?resultId=688008 -> wrong resolution: 1280x800 instead of 1280 x 1024.


Maybe Monitor doesn't support 1280 x 1024 -> but then: shit happens. :D


No result -> no reasonable Link, no Picture, unrealistic Score for clocks.




http://www.hwbot.org/compare.do?resultId=688155'>http://www.hwbot.org/compare.do?resultId=688155 no resolution



btw:any news in my case???



Verification link is dead, no picture.



Wrong category, not radeon 9500 but radeon 3870.



Time incorrect :

Screenshot : 239.544sec

User validate 2min 39sec 540ms




No url for validation CPUz and screenshot incomplet



Wrong category , move to "Athlon XP 1900+ Palomino"


http://www.hwbot.org/compare.do?resultId=672966 wrong kategorie,this is 256mb-not 512 :)

http://www.hwbot.org/compare.do?resultId=688996 no resolution

http://www.hwbot.org/compare.do?resultId=688155 need more proof that is 256mb version not 512,no resolution anyway

http://www.hwbot.org/compare.do?resultId=684669 no name of card

http://www.hwbot.org/compare.do?resultId=657405 no resolution

http://www.hwbot.org/compare.do?resultId=656420 no resolution




71proste: What has happened exactly? PM me if you will, then I'll look into it :)

Link to comment
Share on other sites

This topic is now closed to further replies.

  • Create New...