TASOS Posted January 20, 2008 Share Posted January 20, 2008 ALL FIXED You missed this one Just a screenshot in forumpost No FM link No resolution No vga info http://www.hwbot.org/result.do?resultId=610962 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
DataNusse Posted January 20, 2008 Share Posted January 20, 2008 Great work massman and thanks, but you missed some. http://www.hwbot.org/result.do?resultId=559487 Athlon 64 2700+ but the category is Athlon XP 2700+ http://www.hwbot.org/result.do?resultId=559831 Athlon XP 2600+ but the category is Athlon XP 2700+ and http://www.hwbot.org/result.do?resultId=678496 Its a Pentium 3, but category is Pentium 3-E (mobile). Thanks PS. More. http://www.hwbot.org/result.do?resultId=689458 Its a MX440-8X (NV18), the category is NX440 (NV17) http://www.hwbot.org/result.do?resultId=689299 Its a MX440-8X (NV18), the category is NX440 (NV17) And can you please take a look at this: http://www.hwbot.org/result.do?resultId=621238 The score is suspiciously high. There is lack of validation of CPU and GPU. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
pointhore Posted January 21, 2008 Share Posted January 21, 2008 I just read over at Bleedinedge that a couple of my benchmarks have been deleted by one of the moderators here. http://www.bleedinedge.com/forum/showpost.php?p=248016&postcount=1 If I understand correctly, they were deleted because of an Invalid checksum. I can't check because they were deleted. Is this the reason why? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Nibbler1 Posted January 21, 2008 Share Posted January 21, 2008 to Gradus read this message: http://titancup.ru/forum/index.php/topic,542.msg7539.html#msg7539 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
gradus Posted January 21, 2008 Share Posted January 21, 2008 to Gradusread this message: http://titancup.ru/forum/index.php/topic,542.msg7539.html#msg7539 ОК Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Crew Turrican Posted January 21, 2008 Crew Share Posted January 21, 2008 wrong categorie. that's no mobile celeron 1.8ghz. http://www.hwbot.org/result.do?resultId=690036 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Pepek86 Posted January 21, 2008 Share Posted January 21, 2008 wrong category, he set in windsor but he;s cpu is brisbane http://www.hwbot.org/result.do?resultId=690085 http://www.hwbot.org/result.do?resultId=690154 http://www.hwbot.org/result.do?resultId=690172 http://www.hwbot.org/result.do?resultId=690088 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Massman Posted January 21, 2008 Share Posted January 21, 2008 i'll fix asap Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
DopeLex Posted January 21, 2008 Share Posted January 21, 2008 http://www.hwbot.org/result.do?resultId=689341 -> unrealistic Score (~49000) - 2nd Place has ~ 27000 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Narmer Posted January 21, 2008 Share Posted January 21, 2008 http://www.hwbot.org/result.do?resultId=688415 wtf? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
pointhore Posted January 22, 2008 Share Posted January 22, 2008 Any moderators have an answer for me on this? http://www.hwbot.org/forum/showpost.php?p=15088&postcount=936 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
o polonos Posted January 22, 2008 Share Posted January 22, 2008 Any moderators have an answer for me on this? http://www.hwbot.org/forum/showpost.php?p=15088&postcount=936 When in score we have invalid checksum and ss missing we block theese scores Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Massman Posted January 22, 2008 Share Posted January 22, 2008 Pointhore, check BE forums Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Narmer Posted January 22, 2008 Share Posted January 22, 2008 wrong cpu category - Johny (warforum.cz) http://www.hwbot.org/result.do?resultId=690414 http://www.hwbot.org/result.do?resultId=690482 http://www.hwbot.org/result.do?resultId=690421 http://www.hwbot.org/result.do?resultId=690422 http://www.hwbot.org/result.do?resultId=690423 http://www.hwbot.org/result.do?resultId=690424 bad pifast screen - Sweet (Overclocking Argentina OC Team) http://www.hwbot.org/result.do?resultId=689290 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
o polonos Posted January 22, 2008 Share Posted January 22, 2008 wrong cpu category - Johny (warforum.cz) http://www.hwbot.org/result.do?resultId=690414 http://www.hwbot.org/result.do?resultId=690482 http://www.hwbot.org/result.do?resultId=690421 http://www.hwbot.org/result.do?resultId=690422 http://www.hwbot.org/result.do?resultId=690423 http://www.hwbot.org/result.do?resultId=690424 bad pifast screen - Sweet (Overclocking Argentina OC Team) http://www.hwbot.org/result.do?resultId=689290 Fixed Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Warrior_oF_Byte Posted January 22, 2008 Share Posted January 22, 2008 Wrong CPU, It's a Brishbane core in a Windsor category. http://www.hwbot.org/result.do?resultId=690085 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Crew Sweet Posted January 23, 2008 Crew Share Posted January 23, 2008 Fixed I am sorry, but I do not know very well that Bench (PiFast), I have only used once before. But this result seemed to be well screen: Forgive my ignorance on this bench Sweet (Overclocking Argentina OC Team) Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Narmer Posted January 23, 2008 Share Posted January 23, 2008 no resolution http://www.hwbot.org/result.do?resultId=672681 http://www.hwbot.org/result.do?resultId=689556 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Crew Sweet Posted January 23, 2008 Crew Share Posted January 23, 2008 Any Moderator see this: Narmer - ClockMeUp! (United Team of Poland) Wrong and Missing , CPU - Data and Grafic-card Data http://www.hwbot.org/result.do?resultId=658364 http://www.hwbot.org/result.do?resultId=659335 No resolution http://www.hwbot.org/compare.do?resultId=690520 CPU-Z : No , validation link of CPU-Z http://www.hwbot.org/compare.do?resultId=689259 http://www.hwbot.org/compare.do?resultId=658371 http://www.hwbot.org/compare.do?resultId=678967 Sweet Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
MaSell Posted January 24, 2008 Share Posted January 24, 2008 CPU-Z : No , validation link of CPU-Z http://www.hwbot.org/compare.do?resultId=689259 http://www.hwbot.org/compare.do?resultId=658371 http://www.hwbot.org/compare.do?resultId=678967 Sweet What is wrong here? Message for moderator: Please make clear situation with GF6600 DDR1 and DDR3 categories!!! Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
mAlkAv!An Posted January 24, 2008 Share Posted January 24, 2008 The new 3DMark05 'WR' is kinda typing mistake... http://www.hwbot.org/result.do?resultId=691102 will take some more years for us to reach 290693 points Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Crew Sweet Posted January 24, 2008 Crew Share Posted January 24, 2008 http://www.hwbot.org/compare.do?resultId=668396 See , sreeen...is one Q6600 not Amd64 3000+ Sweet P.d: All we were wrong, but I apologize for a single mistake Sorry for my English, I'm Spanish Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
knopflerbruce Posted January 24, 2008 Share Posted January 24, 2008 http://www.hwbot.org/result.do?resultId=690195 This score was reported by a user. He thinks it's bugged or something, but I think it's ok. When I search the orb I find plenty of amd x2 / 7900gt setups that do about 30-36k in 3dmark03. Most of them have higher GPU clocks than me, but very few of those scores are with a CPU @ 2.8 and above, my chip was 2.9ghz. And I have 512mb video memory, the others have have 256mb. (the 512mb version is quite rare). Are the mods with me on this one? Edit: this COULD be an SLI run, I remember I had 2 of these cards once, but I'm sure I benched a little bit before I got the 2nd as well. If the score really IS way too high for a single 7900gt 512mb, then move it to the sli rank instead. This was just a 3dr file I found "by accident", and I really don't know much about how these cards compare to each other. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
gradus Posted January 25, 2008 Share Posted January 25, 2008 6600DDR kszonek (United Team of Poland): http://www.hwbot.org/result.do?resultId=658176 - GOZ driver http://www.hwbot.org/result.do?resultId=658171 - GOZ driver http://www.hwbot.org/result.do?resultId=658174 - GOZ driver http://www.hwbot.org/result.do?resultId=657772 - GOZ driver http://www.hwbot.org/result.do?resultId=658168 - GOZ driver Wolfnyght (HwMania-OC-Team): http://www.hwbot.org/result.do?resultId=688385 - cheat or sli, not real on Processor: Core 2 E6400 (2.13G... @ 3701mhz Videocard: GeForce 6600 DDR PCI @ 639/355mhz Compare to this result http://www.hwbot.org/result.do?resultId=661158. http://www.hwbot.org/result.do?resultId=688299 - cheat or sli Compare to this result http://www.hwbot.org/result.do?resultId=661159. http://www.hwbot.org/result.do?resultId=688399 - not real again http://www.hwbot.org/result.do?resultId=688334 - same.... http://www.hwbot.org/result.do?resultId=688308 - NOT REAL!!!!!!!!!!!!!....... http://www.hwbot.org/result.do?resultId=641878 3dm06. 1024x768. MaSell (Team OCX).....Team OCX....=-0 and 6600DDR3 in 6600DDR..... http://www.hwbot.org/result.do?resultId=655229 http://www.hwbot.org/result.do?resultId=637950 - NOT REAL!!!!! delete this! 6600DDR 551/351mhz can't do 83k!!!! Message for moderator: Please make clear situation with GF6600 DDR1 and DDR3 categories!!! And you could not correct the results? Too difficultly? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
MaSell Posted January 25, 2008 Share Posted January 25, 2008 http://www.hwbot.org/result.do?resultId=637950 - NOT REAL!!!!! delete this! 6600DDR 551/351mhz can't do 83k!!!! Proper drivers (can be whql), proper setting and system tweaks, and it's pretty easy to do And you could not correct the results? Too difficultly? 1. Bwanafost said that he will do this 2. I cannot correct other scores 3. Why others with ddr3 in ddr1 category got much more points, because Bwana made new category and don't have time for weeks to move all ddr3 scores to proper category. Why I must loose my points, but other not? I think there are same rules for all. With ddr1 and ddr3 category is more problems than with one... Very interesting is that my 2x 6600ddr3 in 2006 dissaper Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts