phobosq Posted January 25, 2008 Share Posted January 25, 2008 http://www.hwbot.org/result.do?resultId=573079 - no verification Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
gradus Posted January 25, 2008 Share Posted January 25, 2008 Proper drivers GOZ? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
MaSell Posted January 25, 2008 Share Posted January 25, 2008 GOZ? Â Read what I wrote in "( )"... WHQL, official nv drivers Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
gradus Posted January 25, 2008 Share Posted January 25, 2008 Read what I wrote in "( )"... WHQL, official nv drivers you have 6600DDR? do plz 83k on 551/351mhz clocks. Â compare: http://www.hwbot.org/result.do?resultId=637950 - 83354, 4050mhz, 551/351mhz http://www.hwbot.org/result.do?resultId=667805 - 74518, 4068mhz, 662/350mhz http://www.hwbot.org/result.do?resultId=678487 - 73144, 4500mhz, 600/350mhz Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
MaSell Posted January 25, 2008 Share Posted January 25, 2008 you have 6600DDR? do plz 83k on 551/351mhz clocks. Â Now unfortunatly I haven't got any, but look at kszonek's score. He isn't a cheater and got also nice score . Â EOT Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
gradus Posted January 25, 2008 Share Posted January 25, 2008 but look at kszonek's score. He isn't a cheater and got also nice score . EOT  WTF?!?! LOL!!!!!! kszonek is cheater...GOZ driver is cheating! I do 110k on this driver! Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Crew Turrican Posted January 26, 2008 Crew Share Posted January 26, 2008 http://www.hwbot.org/result.do?resultId=659279 404secs are not 3 min 44. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
PowerToTheUsers Posted January 26, 2008 Share Posted January 26, 2008 http://www.hwbot.org/result.do?resultId=631560 Â 18 Sep 2007 05:40 checked (crew) o polonos checked by a moderator (moved to right cathegory )18 Sep 2007 05:40 modified o polonos manually modified by moderator (o polonos) - reason: no reason given But it's still wrong: it's the same result as http://www.hwbot.org/result.do?resultId=591247, which is matched correctly. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
fefi Posted January 26, 2008 Share Posted January 26, 2008 This result has been moderated by the hwbot crew, and can not longer be reported. http://www.hwbot.org/result.do?resultId=558036 http://www.hwbot.org/result.do?resultId=635559 Â WTF?! Â In both case the result should have been moderated? Ranked results without verification link... Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
kim55 Posted January 26, 2008 Share Posted January 26, 2008 http://www.hwbot.org/compare.do?resultId=574471 -not Valid http://www.hwbot.org/compare.do?resultId=648383 - 256mb card in 128mb category http://www.hwbot.org/compare.do?resultId=613901 - BAD orb link Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Crew Turrican Posted January 26, 2008 Crew Share Posted January 26, 2008 1st http://www.hwbot.org/result.do?resultId=661526 2nd http://www.hwbot.org/result.do?resultId=664123 Â http://www.hwbot.org/quickSearch.do?hardwareId=CPU_1039 the 1st and 2nd place are from the same user in this categorie and points are count for first and the second place. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
pointhore Posted January 27, 2008 Share Posted January 27, 2008 Any moderators have an answer for me on this? http://www.hwbot.org/forum/showpost.php?p=15088&postcount=936  Anything yet? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
death Posted January 27, 2008 Share Posted January 27, 2008 http://www.hwbot.org/result.do?resultId=660743  humm strange how it says 2 of 2 cores and not what it should say 4 of 4 cores ive just ran cpuz 1.41 and it shows my quad as 4 of 4 core so this score is not valide at all can some one plaes look at it thanks  http://valid.x86-secret.com/show_oc.php?id=251157 ment to be 2 0f 2 cores    http://valid.x86-secret.com/show_oc.php?id=267708 this one is right Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Pepek86 Posted January 27, 2008 Share Posted January 27, 2008 How long I must wait to fix it. I raported this link week ago.  wrong cpu category. Brisbane in windsor category  http://www.hwbot.org/result.do?resultId=690088 http://www.hwbot.org/result.do?resultId=690172 http://www.hwbot.org/result.do?resultId=690432 http://www.hwbot.org/result.do?resultId=690392 http://www.hwbot.org/result.do?resultId=690154 http://www.hwbot.org/result.do?resultId=690085  screen doesn't show what is cpu http://www.hwbot.org/result.do?resultId=683413 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
klopcha Posted January 27, 2008 Share Posted January 27, 2008 Please fix: http://www.hwbot.org/compare.do?resultId=683557 hidden resolution http://www.hwbot.org/compare.do?resultId=678508 hidden resolution http://www.hwbot.org/compare.do?resultId=668730 hidden resolution http://www.hwbot.org/compare.do?resultId=582571 hidden resolution  http://www.hwbot.org/compare.do?resultId=564989 No link, no image http://www.hwbot.org/result.do?resultId=664123 and http://www.hwbot.org/result.do?resultId=661526 2 results at 1 user  http://www.hwbot.org/compare.do?resultId=639336 FM link dead http://www.hwbot.org/compare.do?resultId=575451 FM link dead http://www.hwbot.org/compare.do?resultId=575453 FM link dead http://www.hwbot.org/compare.do?resultId=507285 FM link dead Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
mAlkAv!An Posted January 27, 2008 Share Posted January 27, 2008 hey klopcha, actually it should look like this, if any settings(even resolution) are different to standard ones: Â Â same for 3DMark03 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
PowerToTheUsers Posted January 27, 2008 Share Posted January 27, 2008 hey klopcha,actually it should like this, if any settings(even resolution) are different to standard ones: Â Â same for 3DMark03 Â You din't even need photoshop to cheat that away :roll: Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
topdog Posted January 27, 2008 Share Posted January 27, 2008 Racuch has posted the following benchmarks as seen in this link  http://www.hwbot.org/user.do?userId=11402  It shows that he's using a GeForce 8800 GT 256 Mb but if you check his screenshot for 3DMark06, rivatuner shows it clearly as 8800 GT512mb http://img120.imageshack.us/img120/5717/3dm2k6racuch18144pktrr3.jpg  same with 3DMark05 GPU-Z shows it as 512mb http://img179.imageshack.us/img179/1232/3dm2k528167pktracuchqg8.jpg  Same again in 3DMark03 http://img244.imageshack.us/img244/3073/3dm2k352569pktracuchfv7.jpg  3DMark01 it is hidden in the screnshot http://img184.imageshack.us/img184/2298/3dm2k188603pktracuchty0.jpg  Aquamark score looks unreal for 8800GT 256mb as videocard overclock compared to other GeForce 8800 GT 256 Mb seems way to high http://www.hwbot.org/result.do?resultId=691552 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
mAlkAv!An Posted January 27, 2008 Share Posted January 27, 2008 You din't even need photoshop to cheat that away :roll: Â right, but u also dont need Photoshop to 'cheat' another Resolution. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
aspms* Posted January 28, 2008 Share Posted January 28, 2008 http://www.hwbot.org/result.do?resultId=692532 Â Posted 8800GTS score @ GT list! Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Massman Posted January 29, 2008 Share Posted January 29, 2008 Sorry for the delay guys, I'll have a look at the (gigantic) list from the moment I find the time (tomorrow my last exam, so I should find some time pretty soon . Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Patagonian Posted January 30, 2008 Share Posted January 30, 2008 http://www.hwbot.org/result.do?resultId=562420 hidden resolution  http://www.hwbot.org/result.do?resultId=603944 hidden resolution http://www.hwbot.org/result.do?resultId=622754 hidden resolution http://www.hwbot.org/result.do?resultId=603643 hidden resolution http://www.hwbot.org/result.do?resultId=642465 hidden resolution http://www.hwbot.org/result.do?resultId=604004 hidden resolution  http://www.hwbot.org/result.do?resultId=602819 hidden resolution http://www.hwbot.org/result.do?resultId=526500 hidden resolution http://www.hwbot.org/result.do?resultId=605558 hidden resolution http://www.hwbot.org/result.do?resultId=522515 hidden resolution  http://www.hwbot.org/result.do?resultId=648686 hidden resolution _________________  fix it tnx! Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
mAlkAv!An Posted January 30, 2008 Share Posted January 30, 2008 Benchmark wasnt run with default settings. Points are way to high for that clocks... Â http://www.hwbot.org/result.do?resultId=662830 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
71proste Posted January 31, 2008 Share Posted January 31, 2008 http://www.hwbot.org/compare.do?resultId=686571'>http://www.hwbot.org/compare.do?resultId=686571 http://www.hwbot.org/compare.do?resultId=679115 http://www.hwbot.org/compare.do?resultId=686571 http://www.hwbot.org/compare.do?resultId=685864 http://www.hwbot.org/compare.do?resultId=679196 http://www.hwbot.org/compare.do?resultId=685857 http://www.hwbot.org/compare.do?resultId=685853 http://www.hwbot.org/compare.do?resultId=679187 ... hidden resolution... Â Patagonian this one is ok http://www.hwbot.org/result.do?resultId=648686 hidden resolution basic edition of 3dm06 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Crew Turrican Posted January 31, 2008 Crew Share Posted January 31, 2008 you can't see the used video card here: http://www.hwbot.org/result.do?resultId=693970 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts