Wrong Result

[topdog]

All the results below have been entered in the GeForce 8800 GT 256 Mb category but they are GeForce 8800 GT 512 Mb video cards

 

http://www.hwbot.org/result.do?resultId=693360 512 in description

 

http://www.hwbot.org/result.do?resultId=691553 512 in description

 

http://www.hwbot.org/result.do?resultId=691036 512 in description

 

http://www.hwbot.org/result.do?resultId=685349 512 in description

 

http://www.hwbot.org/result.do?resultId=693407 512 in description

 

http://www.hwbot.org/result.do?resultId=687754 512 in description

 

http://www.hwbot.org/result.do?resultId=690897 no proof but other benchmarks was with 512 mb

 

http://www.hwbot.org/result.do?resultId=689963 no proof that it is 256 mb

 

http://www.hwbot.org/result.do?resultId=684795 no proof

 

http://www.hwbot.org/result.do?resultId=682976 no proof

 

http://www.hwbot.org/result.do?resultId=691554 512 in description

 

http://www.hwbot.org/result.do?resultId=694148 ATI Radeon 9800 XT in futuremark link, and screenshot of GPU_Z displays 8800 GT 512 Mb card

 

http://www.hwbot.org/result.do?resultId=694319 Same user as above but different team, ATI Radeon 9800 XT in futuremark link, and screenshot of GPU_Z displays 8800 GT 512 Mb card

 

http://www.hwbot.org/result.do?resultId=681706 no proof

 

http://www.hwbot.org/result.do?resultId=686510 no proof, sig in forumpost shows 8800 GT 512

 

http://www.hwbot.org/result.do?resultId=687443 Single Water Cooled EVGA 8800GT 512 indescription

 

http://www.hwbot.org/result.do?resultId=684791 no proof that it is 256 mb

 

http://www.hwbot.org/result.do?resultId=682971 same user as above, no proof that it is 256 mb

 

http://www.hwbot.org/result.do?resultId=694729 futuremark link shows 512 mb

 

http://www.hwbot.org/result.do?resultId=691322 512 in description

 

http://www.hwbot.org/result.do?resultId=688062 same user as above 512 in description

 

http://www.hwbot.org/result.do?resultId=689175 no proof that it is 256 mb

 

http://www.hwbot.org/result.do?resultId=682877 futuremark link shows 512

 

http://www.hwbot.org/result.do?resultId=681602 no proof

 

http://www.hwbot.org/result.do?resultId=687795 futuremark link shows 512

 

http://www.hwbot.org/result.do?resultId=691080 futuremark link shows 512

 

http://www.hwbot.org/result.do?resultId=689105 same user as above

 

http://www.hwbot.org/result.do?resultId=687509 512 in description and futuremark link

 

http://www.hwbot.org/result.do?resultId=691113 no proof

 

http://www.hwbot.org/result.do?resultId=691582 futuremark link shows 512

 

http://www.hwbot.org/result.do?resultId=690902 no proof that it is 256 mb

 

http://www.hwbot.org/result.do?resultId=688346 same as above

 

http://www.hwbot.org/result.do?resultId=682399 no proof that it is 256 mb

 

http://www.hwbot.org/result.do?resultId=687872 no proof that it is 256 mb

 

http://www.hwbot.org/result.do?resultId=681627 512 in description

 

http://www.hwbot.org/result.do?resultId=693497 screenshot of GPU_Z displays 8800 GT 512 Mb

 

http://www.hwbot.org/result.do?resultId=693505 screenshot of GPU_Z displays 8800 GT 512 Mb

 

http://www.hwbot.org/result.do?resultId=693492 no proof

 

http://www.hwbot.org/result.do?resultId=692932 no proof

 

http://www.hwbot.org/result.do?resultId=692671 screenshot of GPU_Z displays 8800 GT 512 Mb

 

http://www.hwbot.org/result.do?resultId=692583 no proof

 

http://www.hwbot.org/result.do?resultId=690637 no proof

 

http://www.hwbot.org/result.do?resultId=690475 no proof

 

http://www.hwbot.org/result.do?resultId=688443 no proof

 

http://www.hwbot.org/result.do?resultId=690718 512 in description

 

http://www.hwbot.org/result.do?resultId=688440 no proof

 

http://www.hwbot.org/result.do?resultId=688435 no proof

 

http://www.hwbot.org/result.do?resultId=687545 screenshot of GPU_Z displays 8800 GT 512 Mb

 

http://www.hwbot.org/result.do?resultId=687086 no proof

 

http://www.hwbot.org/result.do?resultId=691910 512 in description

 

http://www.hwbot.org/result.do?resultId=686677 no proof

 

http://www.hwbot.org/result.do?resultId=686956 no proof

 

http://www.hwbot.org/result.do?resultId=686663 screenshot of GPU_Z displays 8800 GT 512 Mb

 

http://www.hwbot.org/result.do?resultId=686660 no proof

 

http://www.hwbot.org/result.do?resultId=685682 no proof

 

http://www.hwbot.org/result.do?resultId=681643 no proof

 

http://www.hwbot.org/result.do?resultId=681637 no proof

 

http://www.hwbot.org/result.do?resultId=683327 no proof

 

http://www.hwbot.org/result.do?resultId=690540 no validation

 

http://www.hwbot.org/result.do?resultId=687667 no proof 8800 512 in sig

 

http://www.hwbot.org/result.do?resultId=689874 no validation

 

http://www.hwbot.org/result.do?resultId=682629 futuremark link shows 512

 

http://www.hwbot.org/result.do?resultId=688427 512 in description

 

http://www.hwbot.org/result.do?resultId=694156 no proof

 

http://www.hwbot.org/result.do?resultId=683841 futuremark link shows 512

 

http://www.hwbot.org/result.do?resultId=685335 512 in description

 

http://www.hwbot.org/result.do?resultId=689196 futuremark link shows 512

 

http://www.hwbot.org/result.do?resultId=685404 futuremark link shows 512

 

http://www.hwbot.org/result.do?resultId=688713 no proof

 

http://www.hwbot.org/result.do?resultId=688058 512 in description

 

http://www.hwbot.org/result.do?resultId=692734 Gainward 8800GT GS

 

http://www.hwbot.org/result.do?resultId=682400 no proof, sig in forumpost shows 8800 GT 512

 

 

http://www.hwbot.org/result.do?resultId=693386 512 in description

 

http://www.hwbot.org/result.do?resultId=691370 no proof that it is 256 mb

 

 

http://www.hwbot.org/result.do?resultId=690436 not enough proof

 

 

Sorry for the long list but I just want my trophies back

[S_A_V]

http://www.hwbot.org/result.do?resultId=698186 - wrong category: 8800GT in 7300GT

http://www.hwbot.org/result.do?resultId=697809 - wrong category: 8800Ultra in 7300GT

http://www.hwbot.org/result.do?resultId=697808 - wrong category: 8800GTS in 7300GT

[DopeLex]

http://www.hwbot.org/compare.do?resultId=697936

 

=> no resolution, Settings not visible, unrealistic score for single 7800 GTX @ used Clocks.

 

Probably lower Resolution - maybe because of this, the 3DMark settings are covered.

[71proste]

Oooo yeahhh U'r right Dopelex i have raported 4-5 times already this result,so please delete it.

Score is so high because of wrong resolution or SLI!!!!!!!!!

 

and more results made by same guy without resolutions:

http://www.hwbot.org/compare.do?resultId=694660

http://www.hwbot.org/compare.do?resultId=689538

http://www.hwbot.org/compare.do?resultId=680560

http://www.hwbot.org/compare.do?resultId=675901

http://www.hwbot.org/compare.do?resultId=693030

http://www.hwbot.org/compare.do?resultId=695914

http://www.hwbot.org/compare.do?resultId=697936

http://www.hwbot.org/compare.do?resultId=693345

http://www.hwbot.org/compare.do?resultId=697928

http://www.hwbot.org/compare.do?resultId=692353

http://www.hwbot.org/compare.do?resultId=696320

http://www.hwbot.org/compare.do?resultId=689494

http://www.hwbot.org/compare.do?resultId=693026

http://www.hwbot.org/compare.do?resultId=697930

http://www.hwbot.org/compare.do?resultId=693339

http://www.hwbot.org/compare.do?resultId=680136

http://www.hwbot.org/compare.do?resultId=695909

http://www.hwbot.org/compare.do?resultId=689521

 

i'm not sure about 3dm01 version He used,so please check this out

[Patagonian]

http://www.hwbot.org/result.do?resultId=592336 wrong videocard

http://www.hwbot.org/result.do?resultId=650027 wrong videocard

http://www.hwbot.org/result.do?resultId=656051 wrong videocard

http://www.hwbot.org/result.do?resultId=610412 wrong videocard

http://www.hwbot.org/result.do?resultId=610436 82855 Integrated vga can´t run 3dmark05, no resolution, not screenshoot, not nothing

http://www.hwbot.org/result.do?resultId=610418 82855 Integrated vga can´t run 3dmark06, no resolution, not screenshoot, not nothing

[MaSell]

http://www.hwbot.org/result.do?resultId=610412 wrong video card

[mAlkAv!An]

Please look those results:

http://www.hwbot.org/searchResults.do?direction=&applicationId=0&teamId=0&userName=Svikens&gpu=&numberOfVideocards=0&cpu=Sempron+2800%2B+%28Athlon+XP%29+%28108%29&chipset=&model=&manufacturer=&minScore=&maxScore=&gpuId=0&cpuId=546&chipsetId=0&modelId=0&manufacturerId=0&offset=0&displayAdvanced=false&countryId=0&dateFrom=&dateUntil=&minGpuCoreFreq=&maxGpuCoreFreq=&minGpuMemFreq=&maxGpuMemFreq=&minCpuFreq=&maxCpuFreq=&system=&minTotalPoints=

The guy seems to have an AMD Sempron for Socket A, but it's not the 2800+ with Thoroughbred core, which all other guys(like me) used to bench. His cpu has got a Thorton Core...

Either it should be moved to another category(with Thorton core), needs a new category, or will be deleted.

Not that fair to have both Cores in one category cuz there's a big difference in overcklockability.

[71proste]

http://www.hwbot.org/compare.do?resultId=679546 no resolution

http://www.hwbot.org/compare.do?resultId=692743 no resolution

http://www.hwbot.org/compare.do?resultId=625838 no resolution

http://www.hwbot.org/compare.do?resultId=671409 wrong resolution

http://www.hwbot.org/compare.do?resultId=580696 no resolution

http://www.hwbot.org/compare.do?resultId=668984 wrong resolution

http://www.hwbot.org/compare.do?resultId=661480 wrong resolution

[Narmer]

http://www.hwbot.org/result.do?resultId=690407

Wrong category - Yonah in Northwood category

[mikiiioo]

What is about 1280/800 resolution in 3dm06??Is allowed?I know some screens can display 1280/800 only,but....this is not def.resolution for 3dm06

[Pepek86]

http://www.hwbot.org/result.do?resultId=699378 no resolution

http://www.hwbot.org/result.do?resultId=699396 no resolution

http://www.hwbot.org/result.do?resultId=699282 no resolution

http://www.hwbot.org/result.do?resultId=699407 no resolution

[lunatic@98]

What is about 1280/800 resolution in 3dm06??Is allowed?I know some screens can display 1280/800 only,but....this is not def.resolution for 3dm06

 

Than you need a second display/monitor

[Freakezoit]

http://www.hwbot.org/compare.do?resultId=675041 Screen shows an G92 GTS 512MB but ranked as 640MB!

[mikiiioo]

Than you need a second display/monitor

I'm talking about laptops

[intouch]

1 million marks to the aquamark bench !!! with an Opteron 146 and one 8600GT.

I want the same configuration.

 

http://hwbot.org/result.do?resultId=699708

 

Same thing here but with only 100K marks but no verification link and the screen shown only a cpu-z screen !!

 

http://hwbot.org/result.do?resultId=699713

 

++

[mAlkAv!An]

i think it's just some kind of 'introducing' or testing new categories...dunno

 

same here: http://hwbot.org/result.do?resultId=699718

 

 

Edit: already removed

[intouch]

Sorry, I didn't know

[Sweet]

Plese Fix this wrong score:

 

http://www.hwbot.org/compare.do?resultId=547463 No screen, no verification , maybe fake ??

 

http://www.hwbot.org/compare.do?resultId=547510 Idem

 

http://www.hwbot.org/compare.do?resultId=569187 Idem

 

http://www.hwbot.org/compare.do?resultId=550039 Idem

 

 

http://www.hwbot.org/compare.do?resultId=648583 No resolution

 

http://www.hwbot.org/compare.do?resultId=562652 No screen , wrong verification link

 

 

 

Thanks

[MaXtoRZP]

http://www.hwbot.org/result.do?resultId=696079

Matched to wrong category. 12k/06 is toooooo high for 8600GT. Proof link is broken. Please block

[George_o/c]

Take a look at this P4 3GHz Northwood SPi 1M done by NoOsPhErE ...

http://hwbot.org/result.do?resultId=506020

 

It's the top SPi for that cpu category ... Now looking at it, it seemed really weird as F.O.G.N.A who has the second SPi 1M place ... He managed to get 30 seconds with the cpu at almost 5GHz ... But NoOsPhErE, managed to do 29 seconds with his cpu at only 4350MHz ... Isn't it a little weird ? Of course it is

 

Take a look at NoOsPhErE' s validation (well not validation, it's a link to forumpost ) ... This specific SPi 1M time was done with a Pentium D 830 @ 4350MHz ... It's a dualcore, and the ram is of course DDR2 ... http://www.techzonept.com/showpost.php?p=696467

 

How is that validation possible ? It's pretty damn obvious that he is using a different cpu, as it's also clearly stated in the link to forumpost ...

[knopflerbruce]

i think it's just some kind of 'introducing' or testing new categories...dunno

 

same here: http://hwbot.org/result.do?resultId=699718

 

 

Edit: already removed

 

I know Bwanasoft makes some "test scores" sometimes, to try out new rankings or something. Nothing to worry about:)

[mAlkAv!An]

I know Bwanasoft makes some "test scores" sometimes, to try out new rankings or something. Nothing to worry about:)

 

Yeah, that's what i thought (said)

[MaSell]

http://hwbot.org/result.do?resultId=696941 - wprime 1.53

http://hwbot.org/result.do?resultId=696938 - wprime 1.53

[DopeLex]

http://www.hwbot.org/compare.do?resultId=697936

 

=> no resolution, Settings not visible, unrealistic score for single 7800 GTX @ used Clocks.

 

Probably lower Resolution - because of this, the 3DMark settings are covered ! Please delete.

[mAlkAv!An]

Verification Links says Resolution = 1024x768

 

http://www.hwbot.org/result.do?resultId=667249