Rossi Posted February 14, 2008 Share Posted February 14, 2008 3Dmark 2003 - 33453 marks - bonzo_catalin (crazypc.ro) http://www.hwbot.org/result.do?resultId=677577 Description: E6600 @ 3690 , single X1900XT @ 739/864 This is unreal score on 1900XT!! I sent report but has passed more month, but is not present the answer actions Del this result. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Rossi Posted February 14, 2008 Share Posted February 14, 2008 wPrime 1024m - 3min 56sec 980ms - kawal ("(Overclocker.es)") http://www.hwbot.org/result.do?resultId=689818 wPrime 32m - 7sec 940ms - kawal ("(Overclocker.es)") http://www.hwbot.org/result.do?resultId=689817 This is unreal result for one Xeon 3220. Special Xeon 3220 @ 2992mhz with Dell Inc. 0MY171!! Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
bartx Posted February 15, 2008 Share Posted February 15, 2008 http://www.hwbot.org/compare.do?resultId=700212 - probably running SLI in single card category http://www.hwbot.org/compare.do?resultId=700214- probably running SLI in single card category Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Droperidolum Posted February 15, 2008 Share Posted February 15, 2008 fake or probably running SLI in single card category http://www.hwbot.org/result.do?resultId=694905 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Freakezoit Posted February 15, 2008 Share Posted February 15, 2008 Not fixed yet http://www.hwbot.org/compare.do?resultId=675041 Screen shows an G92 GTS 512MB but ranked as 640MB! Please Fix this Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
zavlakas Posted February 15, 2008 Share Posted February 15, 2008 http://www.hwbot.org/result.do?resultId=696941 http://www.hwbot.org/result.do?resultId=696439 http://www.hwbot.org/result.do?resultId=696938 http://www.hwbot.org/result.do?resultId=696428 wPrime 1.53 http://www.hwbot.org/result.do?resultId=698365 http://www.hwbot.org/result.do?resultId=698366 wPrime 1.34 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Patagonian Posted February 16, 2008 Share Posted February 16, 2008 http://www.hwbot.org/result.do?resultId=592336 wrong videocard http://www.hwbot.org/result.do?resultId=650027 wrong videocard http://www.hwbot.org/result.do?resultId=656051 wrong videocard http://www.hwbot.org/result.do?resultId=610412 wrong videocard http://www.hwbot.org/result.do?resultId=610436 82855 Integrated vga can´t run 3dmark05, no resolution, not screenshoot, not nothing http://www.hwbot.org/result.do?resultId=610418 82855 Integrated vga can´t run 3dmark06, no resolution, not screenshoot, not nothing Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Ivan1981 Posted February 16, 2008 Share Posted February 16, 2008 No resolution.Results are too high for this clocks of the card: http://www.hwbot.org/result.do?resultId=700531 http://www.hwbot.org/result.do?resultId=700532 http://www.hwbot.org/result.do?resultId=700536 Possible smaller resolution then default. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
mAlkAv!An Posted February 16, 2008 Share Posted February 16, 2008 Cheat: wrong resolution(1280x800) http://www.hwbot.org/result.do?resultId=700569 Second time he's trying this with same sys. First one has been deleted because of same reason... Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
DopeLex Posted February 16, 2008 Share Posted February 16, 2008 Cheat: wrong resolution(1280x800) http://www.hwbot.org/result.do?resultId=700569 Second time he's trying this with same sys. First one has been deleted because of same reason... Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
bartx Posted February 17, 2008 Share Posted February 17, 2008 But if someone has wide LCD in his notebook, it isn't possible to run 3d mark 2006 in 1280x1024 res, only in 1280x800. Although, it can depends on version of 3d mark - in basic version, you cannot change anything, so then resolution should be standard? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
mAlkAv!An Posted February 17, 2008 Share Posted February 17, 2008 It's just not regular and not fair according to other users. If i would have only an old 15" CRT for benching f.e. with no 1280x1024 support i have simply bad luck. Either the guy dont submit such results or he got to use an external monitor for this benchmark. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
demiurg Posted February 17, 2008 Share Posted February 17, 2008 http://hwbot.org/result.do?resultId=676864 The score is too big for such clocks. Compare with http://hwbot.org/result.do?resultId=684256 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
demiurg Posted February 17, 2008 Share Posted February 17, 2008 http://hwbot.org/result.do?resultId=695914 fake or probably running SLI in single card category Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
71proste Posted February 17, 2008 Share Posted February 17, 2008 It's just not regular and not fair according to other users.If i would have only an old 15" CRT for benching f.e. with no 1280x1024 support i have simply bad luck. Either the guy dont submit such results or he got to use an external monitor for this benchmark. exactly-u'r right mate Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
mAlkAv!An Posted February 17, 2008 Share Posted February 17, 2008 Multiple 7600GS AGP? lol. Plus no screen, no link, no verification. http://www.hwbot.org/result.do?resultId=636397 Cheat, to high scores, resolution hidden. Perhaps SLI-Setup. http://www.hwbot.org/result.do?resultId=700214 Same... http://www.hwbot.org/result.do?resultId=695914 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Nordling Posted February 18, 2008 Share Posted February 18, 2008 http://www.hwbot.org/quickSearch.do?hardwareId=GPU_1196 all results posted by AN7 OverClocker are fake! It is not visible anywhere, that results put on tested x1650Pro DDR2... It has not given any proofs... Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
THRASHER2 Posted February 18, 2008 Author Share Posted February 18, 2008 Why are the Guys in Videocard Radeon HD 3870 X2 Posting in the (multiple cards): when they have only one card http://www.hwbot.org/quickSearch.do?hardwareId=GPU_1279 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Narmer Posted February 18, 2008 Share Posted February 18, 2008 http://www.hwbot.org/result.do?resultId=690407 Wrong category - Yonah in Northwood category http://www.hwbot.org/result.do?resultId=505889 Wrong category - AXP Mobile in AXP category Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
klopcha Posted February 18, 2008 Share Posted February 18, 2008 http://www.hwbot.org/compare.do?resultId=701697 The benchmark was not run using default settings New rules are necessary, changing Z buffer is received chit. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
knopflerbruce Posted February 19, 2008 Share Posted February 19, 2008 http://www.hwbot.org/result.do?resultId=685155 X2 4400+ Brisbane or Windsor in Toledo rank http://www.hwbot.org/result.do?resultId=686907 Athlon 3500+ in Sempron 3500+ rank Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
71proste Posted February 19, 2008 Share Posted February 19, 2008 http://www.hwbot.org/compare.do?resultId=674334 http://www.hwbot.org/compare.do?resultId=674269 WTF???? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
George_o/c Posted February 19, 2008 Share Posted February 19, 2008 The following results that Nordling posted are not in the right category ... He has posted in the X1650 agp category, while using a X1650 pci-e card ... http://www.hwbot.org/result.do?resultId=701989 http://www.hwbot.org/result.do?resultId=701990 http://www.hwbot.org/result.do?resultId=701991 http://www.hwbot.org/result.do?resultId=701992 http://www.hwbot.org/result.do?resultId=701993 I think it's quite obvious, 'cause he is using a P5E3 WS Pro, a motherboard that's it's commonly known supports only pci-e VGAs, and not AGP ones Take a look at his photos too ... In GPU-Z it's stated : I'm not implementing that Nordling did it on purpose btw Just, that he is clearly mistaken ... Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Potapicus Posted February 19, 2008 Share Posted February 19, 2008 12 days ago I asked to fix some wrong results - http://www.hwbot.org/forum/showpost.php?p=15725&postcount=1022 still no reaction. When it will be fixed? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Kolian Posted February 19, 2008 Share Posted February 19, 2008 Thortons, submitted as Thoroughbreds, and some results with no proof: http://www.hwbot.org/result.do?resultId=648978 http://www.hwbot.org/result.do?resultId=641115 http://www.hwbot.org/result.do?resultId=649000 http://www.hwbot.org/result.do?resultId=640766 http://www.hwbot.org/result.do?resultId=649026 http://www.hwbot.org/result.do?resultId=573592 http://www.hwbot.org/result.do?resultId=649193 http://www.hwbot.org/result.do?resultId=649028 http://www.hwbot.org/result.do?resultId=688350 http://www.hwbot.org/result.do?resultId=592683 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts