MaSell Posted February 19, 2008 Share Posted February 19, 2008 http://hwbot.org/result.do?resultId=695914 - sli or low resolution Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Nordling Posted February 19, 2008 Share Posted February 19, 2008 How much time will it take to learn fucking rules of submit screenshote? WTF? - http://www.hwbot.org/result.do?resultId=702087 (It is necessary to open details of the passed test) And my, normal: http://www.hwbot.org/result.do?resultId=701995 (Verfication post tomorrow in the morning) And my bast (proper\clear\right) exact screenshote (+Verfication): http://www.hwbot.org/result.do?resultId=701992 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
71proste Posted February 19, 2008 Share Posted February 19, 2008 From when is it necessary to open details of the passed test??heh??tell me?? Why U used such words like "fuck.."etc... I dont see any problem with screen U markt as"WTF" Can I ask U one thing?WTF is wrong with U???Take it easy budy.. If u'r in top 20 U have to show verification link otherwise just visible screen with resolution and name of card(and gpu-z if is more than one version of card,like 256 and 512mb) R U angry because someone had better score than U-boloxxxxxxxxxxxx Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Nordling Posted February 19, 2008 Share Posted February 19, 2008 The following results that Nordling posted are not in the right category ... He has posted in the X1650 agp category, while using a X1650 pci-e card ... http://www.hwbot.org/result.do?resultId=701989 http://www.hwbot.org/result.do?resultId=701990 http://www.hwbot.org/result.do?resultId=701991 http://www.hwbot.org/result.do?resultId=701992 http://www.hwbot.org/result.do?resultId=701993 I think it's quite obvious, 'cause he is using a P5E3 WS Pro, a motherboard that's it's commonly known supports only pci-e VGAs, and not AGP ones Take a look at his photos too ... In GPU-Z it's stated : I'm not implementing that Nordling did it on purpose btw Just, that he is clearly mistaken ... lol!!!! Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Nordling Posted February 19, 2008 Share Posted February 19, 2008 + + http://www.controlf.com.ua/product/msi_rx1650-td256e/?p=info !!!!!!!!! Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
George_o/c Posted February 19, 2008 Share Posted February 19, 2008 All right Nordling ... I'm telling you we have different cards ... Don't make me angry now, it's so simple ... X1650 AGP and X1650 PCI-E ARE DIFFERENT ! I didn't implement that you posted results done with a X1650 Pro, but that you are in the wrong category ... In my defense when I saw that there is no proper category for my X1650 AGP I PMed Bwanasoft and he created it ... Why don't you do the same thing, so that a new X1650 PCI-E category is created ? ... Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
mAlkAv!An Posted February 19, 2008 Share Posted February 19, 2008 AMD Thorton Core in Sempron 2800+ Thoroughbred category: http://www.hwbot.org/result.do?resultId=694260 CPU-Z http://www.hwbot.org/result.do?resultId=694263 SuperPi 1M http://www.hwbot.org/result.do?resultId=694264 SuperPi 32M http://www.hwbot.org/result.do?resultId=694262 Pifast http://www.hwbot.org/result.do?resultId=694265 wPrime 32M http://www.hwbot.org/result.do?resultId=694266 wPrime 1024M Pls fix Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
knopflerbruce Posted February 19, 2008 Share Posted February 19, 2008 How much time will it take to learn fucking rules of submit screenshote?WTF? - http://www.hwbot.org/result.do?resultId=702087 (It is necessary to open details of the passed test) And my, normal: http://www.hwbot.org/result.do?resultId=701995 (Verfication post tomorrow in the morning) And my bast (proper\clear\right) exact screenshote (+Verfication): http://www.hwbot.org/result.do?resultId=701992 Lol owned! Learn the rules yourself, I guess:D As you just noticed yourself, sometimes people make (stupid) mistakes. No reason to get upset because of that, all you need to do is post the link and perhaps explain the problem if it isn't obvious (like NO verification at all). And... It's VERY good advice to actually verify that the list for your GPU exists before submitting scores, there are so many different sorts... DDR2/DDR3 agp/pcie etc etc. Makes it alot easier for the mods if they don't have to move a whole bunch of entries to new categories. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
George_o/c Posted February 19, 2008 Share Posted February 19, 2008 The following results that Nordling posted are not in the right category ... He has posted in the X1650 agp category, while using a X1650 pci-e card ... http://www.hwbot.org/result.do?resultId=701989 http://www.hwbot.org/result.do?resultId=701990 http://www.hwbot.org/result.do?resultId=701991 http://www.hwbot.org/result.do?resultId=701992 http://www.hwbot.org/result.do?resultId=701993 I think it's quite obvious, 'cause he is using a P5E3 WS Pro, a motherboard that's it's commonly known supports only pci-e VGAs, and not AGP ones Take a look at his photos too ... In GPU-Z it's stated : I'm not implementing that Nordling did it on purpose btw Just, that he is clearly mistaken ... Please ! Somebody has to take that into consideration ... It's another card ... Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
71proste Posted February 19, 2008 Share Posted February 19, 2008 Lol owned! Learn the rules yourself, I guess:D As you just noticed yourself, sometimes people make (stupid) mistakes. No reason to get upset because of that, all you need to do is post the link and perhaps explain the problem if it isn't obvious (like NO verification at all). yeah exactly,but there isn't problem,screen is 101% ok,the only problem I see is that guy who don't know rules George_o/c take it easy man ;)i'm waiting a long time as well,2 weeks already and I waste a lot of points because of wrong results submitted Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Nordling Posted February 20, 2008 Share Posted February 20, 2008 George_o/c It is not told anywhere which it is a category. It is written only 1650. And who exactly it is not right, you or I are precisely not known. To divide all categories on AGP \PCI it is simply silly Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
knopflerbruce Posted February 20, 2008 Share Posted February 20, 2008 George_o/c It is not told anywhere which it is a category. It is written only 1650. And who exactly it is not right, you or I are precisely not known. To divide all categories on AGP \PCI it is simply silly It will create a mess with all those lists, but it's not silly. The penalty for using agp cards is huge, as you can't use the hottest CPUs etc. WHich means that no-one with the agp version will be able to compete for the top scores. Which means that a new category MUST be created to make things fair:) Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
George_o/c Posted February 20, 2008 Share Posted February 20, 2008 George_o/c It is not told anywhere which it is a category. It is written only 1650. And who exactly it is not right, you or I are precisely not known. To divide all categories on AGP \PCI it is simply silly Thanks a lot ... Firstly you are playing unfair by posting with a PCI-E VGA, to an AGP category (come on dude, you know it's unfair, but you pretend everything's right, god damn' it ! ), and secondly you indirectly call me silly ... I let knopflerbruce speak for myself Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
klopcha Posted February 20, 2008 Share Posted February 20, 2008 http://www.hwbot.org/compare.do?resultId=702100 Needs more proof http://www.hwbot.org/compare.do?resultId=702229 From what time Radeon 8500 has a thermode? http://www.hwbot.org/compare.do?resultId=702225 Needs more proof http://www.hwbot.org/compare.do?resultId=702227 Needs more proof Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Crew Turrican Posted February 20, 2008 Crew Share Posted February 20, 2008 wrong card. the i845g can't run nature tets in 01, because of no shaders http://www.hwbot.org/result.do?resultId=702412 no resolution info http://www.hwbot.org/result.do?resultId=698244 http://www.hwbot.org/result.do?resultId=702000 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Veld Posted February 21, 2008 Share Posted February 21, 2008 http://www.hwbot.org/result.do?resultId=625391 Wrong category - Prescott Cel 2.8 335 in Northwood Cel 2.8 category Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Rossi Posted February 21, 2008 Share Posted February 21, 2008 wPrime 1024m - 3min 56sec 980ms - kawal ("(Overclocker.es)") http://www.hwbot.org/result.do?resultId=689818 wPrime 32m - 7sec 940ms - kawal ("(Overclocker.es)") http://www.hwbot.org/result.do?resultId=689817 This is unreal result for one Xeon 3220. Special Xeon 3220 @ 2992mhz with Dell Inc. 0MY171!! 3Dmark 2003 - 33453 marks - bonzo_catalin (crazypc.ro) http://www.hwbot.org/result.do?resultId=677577 Description: E6600 @ 3690 , single X1900XT @ 739/864 This is unreal score on 1900XT!! I sent report but has passed more month, but is not present the answer actions Del this result. I write that on pager 106 but is not present the answer actions........ !!! Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Rossi Posted February 21, 2008 Share Posted February 21, 2008 http://www.hwbot.org/compare.do?resultId=701020 Aquamark - 7172 marks - George_o/c (OutOfSpecs.Gr) Processor: Pentium 4 3.0Ghz No... @ 3355mhz [ view screenshot ] Videocard: GeForce2 MX400 32MB @ 285/303mhz [#1 GeForce2 MX400 32MB in Aquamark] on air On screen only CPU-Z and Ati Tool but where riva tuner or gpu-z?! needs more proof!! Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
gprhellas Posted February 22, 2008 Share Posted February 22, 2008 Hello guys I have a complain here. Can please anyone moderator explain to me why this two score (whit 7900GS) is not fixed yet. http://www.hwbot.org/result.do?resultId=700214 http://www.hwbot.org/result.do?resultId=700212 It is obvious that this two scores are made with two card (with moded drivers in SLI mode) and have reported with many players (me including) and till now is in one card category. PLEASE READ THE HISTORY of this two scores. Please remove these two scores and put it to two card category. Thanks for your time. gprhellas Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
richba5tard Posted February 22, 2008 Share Posted February 22, 2008 gprhellas, both results have been edited. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
gradus Posted February 22, 2008 Share Posted February 22, 2008 http://www.hwbot.org/result.do?resultId=685120 (crew) o polonos checked by a moderator () =-0!!! Aquamark - 127779 marks Processor: Core 2 E6600 (2.4Gh... @ 4000mhz on h2o Videocard: GeForce 7600 GS DDR2 @ 550/450mhz Not real(compare to other results). No info on screen. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
gradus Posted February 22, 2008 Share Posted February 22, 2008 !!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!6600DDR!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!http://www.hwbot.org/result.do?resultId=658171 GOZ http://www.hwbot.org/result.do?resultId=658174 GOZ http://www.hwbot.org/result.do?resultId=657772 GOZ http://www.hwbot.org/result.do?resultId=658168 GOZ http://www.hwbot.org/result.do?resultId=688299 cheat http://www.hwbot.org/result.do?resultId=655229 our friend MaSell and 6600ddr3 http://www.hwbot.org/result.do?resultId=637950 and his friend cheater passat ^^^^^^^ Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
S_A_V Posted February 22, 2008 Share Posted February 22, 2008 http://hwbot.org/result.do?resultId=699852 - no resolution and needs more proof Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
richba5tard Posted February 22, 2008 Share Posted February 22, 2008 http://hwbot.org/result.do?resultId=699852 - no resolution and needs more proof He obviously ran it at the default settings, as he has the lowest HD3600 score... More proof is only required for HOF. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
TASOS Posted February 22, 2008 Share Posted February 22, 2008 He obviously ran it at the default settings, as he has the lowest HD3600 score... More proof is only required for HOF. I believe you are wrong. Take a look again....there's only a score screenshot. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts