Jump to content
HWBOT Community Forums

The official HWBOT Team Cup 2012 - SC6: "PCMark05 xCore" thread.


teurorist

Recommended Posts

  • Crew

Question 1 for the experts: If it's RAM cache, shouldn't it boost other apps too like ASSD, CD, HD Tune ? When testing SSD cache for a review I always get an improvement after the 2nd-3rd run... does RAM cache work differently ? (not taking into account reboots ofcourse)

 

I borrowed Gamers setup : I got a boost in PCMark05 with my Sempron 145 from 18K to 22.5K by applying the appropriate strip sizes mentioned by VAPOR and utilising the AMD Expert tool for the RAID setup (this with 400Mhz lower CPU clocks... ) If I set 64K iso 4K format, my scores for Gen Usage and Virus scan get lower here...

 

I saw a virusscan of 3000 ( single test run ) with the Sempron at 4Ghz, but sometimes it was far lower...

 

Question 2: Does this only work for version 2.18 and maybe future releases ? Older versions don't give the gen usage and virusscan boost ?

Edited by Leeghoofd
Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • Replies 93
  • Created
  • Last Reply

Top Posters In This Topic

The RAID expert Software use ram for caching. This is the same like areca cards do.

 

That is correct. However you can use RAID expert and get "normal" onboard ram caching scores in general usage and virus scan if you don't modify cluster/sector size.

 

With Areca, the RAID controller has RAM onboard, and it will produce high gen usage and virus scan scores consistently regardless of stripe size, sector size or formatting... It produces those big scores because running the storage tests multiple times it puts a lot of the storage tests in its RAM cache. (you must pre-run storage tests to initialize/preload the ram cache on an areca... Without preloading the ram cache on Areca, scores are only "good" not "great")

 

The important difference, in my opinion, is that PCM05 whigs out with RAID expert and changing the cluster/sector size. Yes, Raid expert supports ram caching... But running the storage tests a second time does not increase the scores the way it does for Areca. It doesn't need to be preloaded for ram caching to boost the score. The cluster/sector size changes just produces really high scores every time, because PCM05 is detecting/reporting/calculating the speeds wrong.

 

Does the firmware/driver trick the benchmark or is it just boosting the one thing the benchmark is designed to test for?

 

Certain SSD firmwares perform much better in virus scan and gen usage. The firmware's aren't tweaked for PCM05, just certain drivers with certain optimized firmware happen to work much better for PCM05.

Edited by I.M.O.G.
Link to comment
Share on other sites

We need a clear answer, if allowed or not. Christian Ney says its allowed, but i take care myself and dont abload scores with this maybee Bug.

Said this if it is actually a driver feature that works, if this is just abug under PCMark05 and has no effects at all under other storage benchs then we can't allow it like bugged drivers.

 

Massman will make an official statement on it anyway.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Here are some pics, look at my Volume Size, 219GB.

Then look at HDTune, only 60GB... And read Test gives an Error, Error scan during 1s, all Sectors are damaged, haha :)

 

http://www.abload.de/image.php?img=1kvpbc.jpg

 

http://www.abload.de/image.php?img=216pmo.jpg

 

http://www.abload.de/image.php?img=3qmp0u.jpg

 

So the drivers are fully buged. And its no really Cache, that the driver uses, didnt need to preload Cache like areca, the Power is always the same.

Normally cache needs to preload, first run storage tests, than go for score.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

After some testing, it seems the driver is not really bugged, but some of the caching options just boost the PCMark subtest score. You can try this out yourself. The 12.6 drivers only allows 512bytes sectorisation whereas 12.8 supports 1K, 2K and 4K as well. The results with RAID set at 512bytes is the same on 12.6 and 12.8; it's only when you go to 1K, 2K or 4K that you have a performance boost.

 

So, the scores of Vapor are valid.

 

It does give some food of thought for the PCMark05 benchmark in genera, though.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

After some testing, it seems the driver is not really bugged, but some of the caching options just boost the PCMark subtest score. You can try this out yourself. The 12.6 drivers only allows 512bytes sectorisation whereas 12.8 supports 1K, 2K and 4K as well. The results with RAID set at 512bytes is the same on 12.6 and 12.8; it's only when you go to 1K, 2K or 4K that you have a performance boost.

 

So, the scores of Vapor are valid.

 

It does give some food of thought for the PCMark05 benchmark in genera, though.

 

So it isn't a bug, it's just a performance boost that when applied, increases the score such that onboard raid outperforms $2500 hardware raid with 4GB dedicated ram cache. Understood.

 

Try similar tests on Areca or IRST, and you cannot duplicate it. Only AMD, only with raidxpert. And only with disk benchmarks that don't error out when trying to test after making the changes.

 

Doesn't make sense, but nothing with PCM05 does, so business as usual. :D

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.


×
×
  • Create New...