Jump to content
HWBOT Community Forums

Gyrock - 2x Radeon HD 7970 @ 1450/1800MHz - 22615 marks 3DMark11 - Performance


K404

Recommended Posts

Hi K404-san!

Thanks for your comment for such an old submission :)

As far as I know, 3DM11 requires GPU power much more than CPU one, so the impact of CPU clock is not big.

For the score range like this, even if you earn 1000 pts more from PT, you can only get 80 pts for total score..

The impact is so small that we would better take care of GPU temperature for the best efficiency from VGAs.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Sorry Gyrock-san, I disagree. I have a 3DMark11 calculator and if I use these examples, based on your 22615 score (I change one variable at a time):

 

Physics score - 1000. Total score = 22355 (-260pt)

Physics score + 1000. Total score = 22851 (+235pt)

 

GPU score - 1000. Total score = 22058 (-560pt)

GPU score + 1000. Total score = 23156 (+550pt)

 

Of course, adding 1000 to the CPU score is a bigger % increase than adding 1000 points to the GPU score.

 

.... but I do not understand how you matched the Physics test and Combined test scores of people running 500MHz higher than you. Good tweaking? (quite possible!! :D) Bug? (I hope not :()

Edited by K404
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Hi K404-san

 

You are right and I am wrong:P

I just misunderstood the figure, sorry for that.

 

Your calculation is correct, as my calculator says the same :D

Refer to attachment file.

 

The reason of good PT score is due to ver.1.0.1 whose PT score is higher than other versions.

It' no secret. Please read the thread below.

http://hwbot.org/forum/showthread.php?t=32095

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Hi subaruwrc-san :)

There is no trick of Vantage CPU test, on X79 all you need to do is memory tweaking for better efficiency. That's the very different point compared to on X58.

Mem clock@1200MHz and timing like 9-11-9-27 or 8-11-8-27 would give you 1000 more points, I think.

Try this :)

Link to comment
Share on other sites

^ True I have tested with same conclusion for moa Americas

 

Tight timings better than frequency :) and 1.0.1 version give boost without any changes.

 

2400 10-12-10 (GTX8 Hynix)

A15Of.jpg

 

1866 8-8-8 (dominator GT Hyper)

mmNUZ.png

 

700 points faster in physx (2.25FPS)

 

here is 5.0ghz 8-11-9 2400mhz for 17.2k

http://hwbot.org/submission/2281489_splave_3dmark11___performance_radeon_hd_7970_14925_marks

 

so tighter timings and 100mhz more cpu clock is totally achievable 17.6k

 

:)

Edited by Splave
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

×
×
  • Create New...