Aquamark , low result

[Guest Ximi]

Hello ,

 

I install HWBOT Aquamark on XP SO and run with that settings and result :

 

2600 k , 2 Cores HT Off , 5500 Mhz

GTX 580 SOC , 1025/1980/2200 Mhz

 

 

D3DOverdrive On Triple Buffer

 

Drivers 285.38 Beta

 

How is posible that low result ?

 

On 3DMark 2001 the result its Ok , see it :

 

 

Any idea that low result on Aquamark ?

 

Thanks on advance

[K404]

Hey bro! Fermi + XP is terrible for AM3, you need to use W7

[Guest Ximi]

Hello friend ! That's Ok , I try on Win 7 quickly !!

 

Thanks for idea !

[Massman]

Apply same tweak like you do for 01 + fermi and you will have good AM3 scores in XP.

[Christian Ney]

good aka better than under Win7 with proper tweaks ?

[K404]

Apply same tweak like you do for 01 + fermi and you will have good AM3 scores in XP.

 

Poor performance in XP is down to D3D?

[Guest Ximi]

good aka better than under Win7 with proper tweaks ?

 

Low result anyway on Win 7 , 254 K only .....

 

With old Aquamark the results are the best than now.

[K404]

Have you renamed the aquamark3.exe?

[Guest Ximi]

Have you renamed the aquamark3.exe?

 

That's Ok , now Yeahhhh good result here :

 

http://hwbot.org/submission/2297158_ximi_aquamark_geforce_gtx_580_378140_marks?recalculate=true

 

Not the best but good near.

 

Thanks friend !!

[K404]

Any time bro!

 

Can you push to 1066MHz strap for the memory? That will help you for sure

[GENiEBEN]

Apply same tweak like you do for 01 + fermi and you will have good AM3 scores in XP.

 

Cmon just tell people to use PRE_D3D9_COMP_BIT

[Guest Ximi]

Any time bro!

 

Can you push to 1066MHz strap for the memory? That will help you for sure

 

Well done bro !!!

 

Now adjust best memory timing , scaling Mhz , best setup and high +3000.

 

Not my best result but seems good !

 

http://hwbot.org/submission/2297171_ximi_aquamark_geforce_gtx_580_380907_marks?recalculate=true

 

In the Bios I put it on Xtreme Bit , its ASUS Maximus IV Extreme.

[K404]

Better is better!

 

LOL....since you started this thread, your score has more than doubled. That's pretty cool

[Guest Ximi]

Better is better!

 

LOL....since you started this thread, your score has more than doubled. That's pretty cool

 

Yes , good work bro !!!

 

Thanks is really cool !! :celebration:

[Massman]

Poor performance in XP is down to D3D?

 

No.

 

Cmon just tell people to use PRE_D3D9_COMP_BIT

 

Hehe ... I thought that was super-obvious

[K404]

No.

 

 

 

Hehe ... I thought that was super-obvious

 

So...... changing a D3D setting fixes AM3, but the fix isn't related to D3D?

[Massman]

It's the same Nvidia Inspector tweak for Fermi+01 that also fixes Aquamark3 XP performance

 

The bit is called 'PRE_D3D9_COMP_BIT'

[K404]

You missed my question?

 

Me: "Poor performance in XP is down to D3D?"

 

You: "No."

 

....but.....it IS down to D3D by the looks of things.

 

I guess it's a mute point. Benchmark fix = benchmark fix

[Massman]

I thought you were talking about the D3D Overrider tool, my bad!

[Guest Ximi]

Hello ,

 

At XP SO , activate D3DOverride and nvidia inspector bit at Aquamark is the best result.

 

See here its the best result than Win 7 :

 

 

This setting is valid for 3D03 , 3D05 ?

 

The result high exponentially.

[uncle fester]

dude you have to set more than 2 cores bro atleast 4

[Guest Ximi]

dude you have to set more than 2 cores bro atleast 4

 

Ok , then is best set 4 cores , but the result not modifies.

 

Thanks for the suggest.