I.M.O.G. Posted July 19, 2012 Share Posted July 19, 2012 Someone reported this submission: http://hwbot.org/submission/2236453 It isn't a particularly valuable score, so I could just delete it. It looks like I made a mistake and forgot to click the memory tab - there are 2 CPU tabs displayed for CPUz. The score is accurate for the clocks however, not especially well tweaked, and memory settings make very little difference for UCBench. I'd like to keep it because there aren't a whole lot of 7GHz UCBench submissions and despite it not being worth much or especially good, I'm proud of the result. I've never had one of my submissions reported before, so I'm not sure how to handle it. Ruling from hwbot staff? Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Gamer Posted July 19, 2012 Share Posted July 19, 2012 I can give you an answer : Hello, An HWBOT moderator, "Christian Ney", has blocked one of your submitted scores. It has marked one of your submissions as 'insufficient verification'. This was the reason the user gave: you forgot cpuz cpu man, have to block http://hwbot.org/submission/2279739_gamer_3dmark06_2x_radeon_hd_5850_42733_marks So yes, they do care Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
I.M.O.G. Posted July 19, 2012 Author Share Posted July 19, 2012 Thanks, appreciate the word of experience. That's kind of a bummer. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Gamer Posted July 19, 2012 Share Posted July 19, 2012 The funny thing is, nr2 in that category reported it So now I will rebench it with even higher clocks Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Eeky NoX Posted July 19, 2012 Share Posted July 19, 2012 Especially when the same moderator gat his 1st place stolen Sorry for you... CN isn't fairplay sometimes ^^ "The rules are the rules!" he said Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Christian Ney Posted July 19, 2012 Share Posted July 19, 2012 Especially when the same moderator gat his 1st place stolen Sorry for you... CN isn't fairplay sometimes ^^ "The rules are the rules!" he said For my defence: Quote=hwbot "HWBot is not perfect, neither are the result moderators" Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Eeky NoX Posted July 19, 2012 Share Posted July 19, 2012 for My Defence: Quote=hwbot "hwbot Is Not impartial, Neither Are The Result Moderators" Omg!! R'ly? I'm joking of course, but I think it's not that good though Even if I know you did'nt report that score, moderators can be quicker than others to report what impacts on their own ones Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
jjjc Posted July 19, 2012 Share Posted July 19, 2012 If it's a legit score that follows the rules then you have no reason to fear the quickfire reporting moderators. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
knopflerbruce Posted July 19, 2012 Share Posted July 19, 2012 We should use "common sense", that is: don't block EVERY result that does not strictly follow the rules, if it's low boint and "normal" in terms of clocks and efficiency, then maybe blocking is not needed. If it receives a fair amount of boints it's different, you can't get away with a top 20 global score without a mem tab in any case for example. I wouldn't block this one, but you do run the risk of having a sub blocked if there's something wrong with the screenshot. It was CN's decision, so I won't undo it. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Christian Ney Posted July 19, 2012 Share Posted July 19, 2012 Didn't block it Yet... Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
I.M.O.G. Posted July 19, 2012 Author Share Posted July 19, 2012 I love the suspense! lol Is a blocked score still listed under a members profile/history? Stopping to think about it, that's all I'm really concerned with... It doesn't count for my league ranking, it only gets 7 points for the team, but I'll remember I did it if its still in my hardware library and that's what actually matters to me. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Christian Ney Posted July 20, 2012 Share Posted July 20, 2012 No, the result isn't shown anymore in your profile's submission/points. I don't think it is in the hardware library too (maybe only if deleted). But it stays in the profile history (last submissions if not too old otherwise you have to scrolls deep down). Anyway we can try Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
I.M.O.G. Posted July 20, 2012 Author Share Posted July 20, 2012 K, let's find out. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Christian Ney Posted July 22, 2012 Share Posted July 22, 2012 done Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
I.M.O.G. Posted July 23, 2012 Author Share Posted July 23, 2012 Gone completely from my profile now, like I never did it. And turrican had just reviewed and approved it earlier today. Lol An HWBOT moderator, "Turrican", has marked one of your submissions as 'checked by a moderator'. This was the reason the user gave: no need for system picture. score is ok, so no mem-tab is ok this time, but next time please don't forget it. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Crew Turrican Posted July 23, 2012 Crew Share Posted July 23, 2012 lol. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Gamer Posted July 23, 2012 Share Posted July 23, 2012 If you last score got errased by Christian, your previous submission isn't visible anymore? Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Crew Leeghoofd Posted July 23, 2012 Crew Share Posted July 23, 2012 WTF biased moderators, the bot is going down Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Crew Turrican Posted July 23, 2012 Crew Share Posted July 23, 2012 not biased, but just giving him a chance, to decide himself. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Christian Ney Posted July 30, 2012 Share Posted July 30, 2012 Checked it back Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Crew Turrican Posted July 30, 2012 Crew Share Posted July 30, 2012 Checked it back looool Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
I.M.O.G. Posted July 30, 2012 Author Share Posted July 30, 2012 And now it says #1 UCBench World Record... Yet its ranked 72nd for hex cores. lol Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Christian Ney Posted July 30, 2012 Share Posted July 30, 2012 Yes because none of them got checked before and as this one is the first one checked ever it has been ranked as WW#1 by the engine Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Join the conversation
You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.