Christian Ney Posted November 20, 2012 Author Share Posted November 20, 2012 Christian Ney: http://hwbot.org/submission/2326765_christian_ney_cpu_frequency_fx_8150_8181.1_mhz This one has nothing to do with the topic, it's rejected because I didn't use module #0. Furthermore it was done with CPUZ 1.61.3 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
I.M.O.G. Posted November 20, 2012 Share Posted November 20, 2012 (edited) No need to get defensive about your sub - you didn't bother to defend anyone else's. Please reference "could affect" above... You know more about the CPUz bugs than me or anyone here I think. Thread title states 1.61.x. Looking at your first post, I see you clarified 1.61.1 and 1.61.2... I hadn't seen that before, so I lumped your sub into my last post with everyone on 1.60 or 1.61.x in the top 20. FWIW, I have no interest/concern for rejected CPUz validations - they have been accepted in the rankings here for a long time and I know about the other than module #0 issue. I brought this up for what I thought was the same reason you started this thread... To look at rejected submissions made on "highly bugged cpuz". Edited November 20, 2012 by I.M.O.G. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Christian Ney Posted November 20, 2012 Author Share Posted November 20, 2012 not enough votes Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Join the conversation
You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.