Jump to content
HWBOT Community Forums

[BUGS] hwbot: Revision 3.5 up and running!


Recommended Posts

Bug: http://hwbot.org/hardware/processor/athlon_64_fx_55_clawhammer?tab=2drankings#superpi

 

The score that's currently on top shouldn't be there. Also, in alot of charts there are many results that are not linked to profiles, and that don't receive boints. Why are those visible? Or maybe a better question: why aren't they rewarded with boints when they are ranked?

 

Those are scanned forum submissions back from the early days. They don't receive points if they are not coupled to a user account. I'll filter them.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • Replies 212
  • Created
  • Last Reply

Top Posters In This Topic

Today i want to upload a Backup-Score (http://hwbot.org/community/submission/977959_) to test the Edit-Function again... but it's still doesnt work.

 

A backup score for PCmark05 Atlon XP?

 

Anyway, I strongly recommend no one to use the edit button to if you have a new score. The engine can't really handle it all to well and chances are the score doesn't get picked up.

 

Submitting this as a new score is the best way to do it.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

A backup score for PCmark05 Atlon XP?

 

Anyway, I strongly recommend no one to use the edit button to if you have a new score. The engine can't really handle it all to well and chances are the score doesn't get picked up.

 

Submitting this as a new score is the best way to do it.

 

Then you should send a PM to all mods so they don't change existing scores, as I had a typo in one of my submissions and I had to reupload to make it work again after a crew member "fixed" it.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

George_o/c, did you change your nickname to something exotic in the past few weeks? I can't find "George_o/c" in the database.

 

Hey mate :)

I spoke to Massman the day before you posted and he thought the problem was occurring due to the fact that my nickname has a slash ("/") in it. So he changed it to George_oc.

 

Just tried to upload a score again. Same problem :(

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • Crew

The family ranking is nice, but a bit buggy - when you look at it, for example: http://hwbot.org/hardware/processor/pentium_1_60mhz?&tab=2drankings&hardware=pentium_1_60mhz&familyId=226#wprime_32m

it show different number of results in each tab - some have 10, some 8, some only 5. Besides, if we click ot the view top 100, it show the category results, though we were viewing family results. And it would be nice if the number of cores in wPrime selection would be inactive if such results do not exist in this category. For example, more than 8 cores in Pentium 1 category is not what we will see in the nearest years.

 

Thank you for attention.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

could it be there's a bug in the team ranking?

 

http://hwbot.org/rankings/teams/worldwide

 

when i click on a team the points are a lot different than when i look in the above link. :confused:

 

Probably with/without WR points. Let me check...

 

- edit - indeed, the total on the team page does not display WR points. I shall include it in the next patch.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • Crew

...tried today serveral times but it wasnt possible to do this flawless.

1st problem:

you have to always fill in the memory type manually, though its already filled in by maxxmem

2nd problem:

maxxmem also filled correct in my cpu (xeon x3440) but after submission its always a Xeon W35xx

 

so lets edit this and we come to problem nr 3:

 

after editing:

 

"not Strunkenbold’s best MaxxMem DDR3 submission, only best is ranked." wtf? this _is_ my best result....

 

http://hwbot.org/community/submission/979105_strunkenbold_maxxmem_ddr3_1389.4_marks

Edited by Strunkenbold
Link to comment
Share on other sites

http://hwbot.org/hardware/processor/athlon_64_4600_x2_brisbane?tab=2drankings#cpu-z

 

Bug: CPUZ seems to be divided by # of sockets, which it shouldn't as CPUZ is a singlethreaded benchmark.

 

It may also be an idea to remove the multi-socket and unlocking options for the CPUs that don't have these features (example: this chip doesn't run in dual socket boards and can't be unlocked), to remove the "misplaced" submissions where people count cores and not sockets.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.


×
×
  • Create New...