topdog Posted November 19, 2013 Share Posted November 19, 2013 There seems to be still a bug regarding point calculation. When you loose global points your total points dont change! I had a massive lost of about 20 points, but my Total Points remain the same. Only after I submitted a new Top15 Global Point result, the bot triggered a recalculation. This is still unresolved, there are many guys ranked in the OCL top thirty with 30-50 too many League points than they should have. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Moose83 Posted November 19, 2013 Share Posted November 19, 2013 Recalculate your subs actually fix it, but would be nice to fix this Bug Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
GENiEBEN Posted November 21, 2013 Share Posted November 21, 2013 Something that happens with aquamark scores, even tho the exact hardware name string is passed: Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Massman Posted November 22, 2013 Author Share Posted November 22, 2013 If you don't add a canardpc-link it asks for an x86-secret link (change to canardpc). This works for CPUz, and maybe refclock/memclock as well? Hm, not sure what you mean. But yeah, the behavior for CPU Frequency is the same as for ref clock and memory clock. Team history is bugged:http://forum.hwbot.org/attachment.php?attachmentid=1647&stc=1&d=1384379564 These members are not from my team. And it would be nice to have team ranking history along with team points history (so that when you point to a certain time stamp, you can see both points and the ranking you've had). Added to buglist: bugs.hwbot.org/browse/HWBOT-1263 Next bug, im loosing global and WR in Aquamark, in submission im 4th, on WR Rankings im 3rd Please fix it http://abload.de/thumb/1c7ujy.jpg http://abload.de/thumb/266ugo.jpg Seems fixed? The VGA name is so long - INTEL GMA X3100 (GM965, GME965, GL960, GLE960) - that it breaks the formatting:https://dl.dropboxusercontent.com/u/10046731/Forum%20Attachments/HWBOT/Screenshot%202013-11-15%2016.13.58.png When trying to upload a system picture from an URL rather than local disk: https://dl.dropboxusercontent.com/u/10046731/Forum%20Attachments/HWBOT/Screenshot%202013-11-15%2016.03.22.png 1) Added to buglist: bugs.hwbot.org/browse/HWBOT-1263 2) Might be an issue with the url formatting? It says image/png, not .png. This is still unresolved, there are many guys ranked in the OCL top thirty with 30-50 too many League points than they should have. We have this issue in our backlog already. Something that happens with aquamark scores, even tho the exact hardware name string is passed: https://dl.dropboxusercontent.com/u/10046731/Forum%20Attachments/HWBOT/cpuc_completion_bug_aqua.png An item in the database does not mean it is recognised via the API. Those are two different things. We have a database with all the hardware items (in this case CPU), and then a separate database for linking the hardware strings from an API request to that aforementioned hardware database. So the item is in our database, but was not linked yet to be supported via API. I did this manually now, so it should be working now. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
knopflerbruce Posted November 22, 2013 Share Posted November 22, 2013 Hm, not sure what you mean. But yeah, the behavior for CPU Frequency is the same as for ref clock and memory clock. You understand what I mean now? Probably an easy fix, though... and not really a huge problem. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
ZFeSS Posted November 23, 2013 Share Posted November 23, 2013 When I try to search fastest SPi 32M LGA771 result(http://url.hwbot.org/1i4iU4i), it shows me that GENiEBEN is fastest, but he is only 5th in QX9775 category. When I narrow my search(adding QX9775 in cpu model), that shows me, that there are only 2 submissions in SPi 32m with QX9775. If you look at QX9775 you will se that it's 8 result there. Other can be found with LGA775 and QX9775 filter, which absolutely wrong. If reason of this bug is in wrong define of socket for QX9775 before, and after changes old submissions still got LGA775 and new - 771, it may happen in other categories(LGA2011 moved to LGA1356, s603 moved to s604, etc). Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
GENiEBEN Posted November 23, 2013 Share Posted November 23, 2013 When I narrow my search(adding QX9775 in cpu model), that shows me, that there are only 2 submissions in SPi 32m with QX9775. If you look at QX9775 you will se that it's 8 result there. I think the problem here is that it only displays 1x scores, rather than all. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
d3mox Posted November 23, 2013 Share Posted November 23, 2013 Had same issue. I was searching submissions of Athlon 3000+ Venice but HWBOT shows results different on PC and iPad. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Moose83 Posted November 23, 2013 Share Posted November 23, 2013 Thanks Massman, its fixed now:) Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
ZFeSS Posted November 24, 2013 Share Posted November 24, 2013 I think the problem here is that it only displays 1x scores, rather than all. Nope. It displays 1x cpu and 2x cpu results when you select amount "any". Old QX9775 submissions(before 2009) got LGA775 socket and new got LGA771(2013) - this is the reason. Compare queries http://url.hwbot.org/1dsyFzS and http://url.hwbot.org/I7VhY5 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Massman Posted November 24, 2013 Author Share Posted November 24, 2013 You understand what I mean now? Probably an easy fix, though... and not really a huge problem. Ah I see. Yeah, small issue but added it anyway. http://bugs.hwbot.org/browse/HWBOT-1265 When I try to search fastest SPi 32M LGA771 result(http://url.hwbot.org/1i4iU4i), it shows me that GENiEBEN is fastest, but he is only 5th in QX9775 category. When I narrow my search(adding QX9775 in cpu model), that shows me, that there are only 2 submissions in SPi 32m with QX9775. If you look at QX9775 you will se that it's 8 result there. Other can be found with LGA775 and QX9775 filter, which absolutely wrong. If reason of this bug is in wrong define of socket for QX9775 before, and after changes old submissions still got LGA775 and new - 771, it may happen in other categories(LGA2011 moved to LGA1356, s603 moved to s604, etc). Good catch! There were about 48k results in the database where the CPU socket in the result table was different from the socket in the cpu model table. This happens when the CPU socket is changed after the result was made. We should add an automatic updater for that. Anyway, your search query should be correct now Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Hyperhorn Posted December 23, 2013 Share Posted December 23, 2013 I guess one day is just enough to beat 23 hours, so that's no real challenge. However 23 hours to beat one day would require some overclocking skills for sure. :banana: On a serious note I've noticed that some challange texts are bugged and an amount of hours is shown instead of the user name. Maybe it is connected to the time left for a competition, but that's just a wild guess. However I really had a good laugh about this one. Examples: http://hwbot.org/challenge/asadsaads_cpu_frequency_global_challenge___dec_21_2013_until_dec_28_2013/ http://hwbot.org/challenge/asadsaads_cpu_frequency_global_challenge___dec_21_2013_until_dec_28_2013_2/ Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Moose83 Posted December 27, 2013 Share Posted December 27, 2013 (edited) When will points calculation fixed? Its a bit sucking to force recalculating after each submit Edit, how can 1 person have 2 times WR Points in 1 Benchmarks? Edited December 27, 2013 by Moose83 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
bartx Posted January 12, 2014 Share Posted January 12, 2014 I noticed the bug with total points. When I submit new score, everything is ok, my points are updated very quickly. But, if I lose points, I had to make manual recalculation, otherwise numer of total points still stay the same. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Massman Posted January 15, 2014 Author Share Posted January 15, 2014 I noticed the bug with total points. When I submit new score, everything is ok, my points are updated very quickly. But, if I lose points, I had to make manual recalculation, otherwise numer of total points still stay the same. We are aware of that issue; it is in the backlog. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Massman Posted January 15, 2014 Author Share Posted January 15, 2014 http://abload.de/img/hwbot_1day_23_hoursk1fpc.jpgI guess one day is just enough to beat 23 hours, so that's no real challenge. However 23 hours to beat one day would require some overclocking skills for sure. :banana: On a serious note I've noticed that some challange texts are bugged and an amount of hours is shown instead of the user name. Maybe it is connected to the time left for a competition, but that's just a wild guess. However I really had a good laugh about this one. Examples: http://hwbot.org/challenge/asadsaads_cpu_frequency_global_challenge___dec_21_2013_until_dec_28_2013/ http://hwbot.org/challenge/asadsaads_cpu_frequency_global_challenge___dec_21_2013_until_dec_28_2013_2/ Added to buglist: http://bugs.hwbot.org/browse/HWBOT-1293 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
GENiEBEN Posted January 15, 2014 Share Posted January 15, 2014 In HWBOT Prime rankings, 48x category does not have WR points, even tho both results are TOP10. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Massman Posted January 15, 2014 Author Share Posted January 15, 2014 A user should only be able to get WR points once. The issue is in the backlog. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
GENiEBEN Posted January 15, 2014 Share Posted January 15, 2014 A user should only be able to get WR points once. The issue is in the backlog. I see, in which case DJ already has #1 and #2, like a boss While you're at it, can you clarify why WR points are not awarded between positions 10 and 20? Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Massman Posted January 15, 2014 Author Share Posted January 15, 2014 Yeah, fixed it manually now. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
GENiEBEN Posted January 21, 2014 Share Posted January 21, 2014 Please add SPOILER tag. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Massman Posted January 22, 2014 Author Share Posted January 22, 2014 Added to backlog Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
MrBreeze Posted February 9, 2014 Share Posted February 9, 2014 Hola Massman and other fine staff. With the new login window, I can no longer log in to my account. I do not have Google, Facebook or any other social network accounts, but the only other option is to register. I'm already registered. I don't see another option for just a plain old login. I am on an iPhone 5, Safari via iOS 6, my favorite platform for forum browsing and watching my global points slowly trickle away. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
GENiEBEN Posted February 14, 2014 Share Posted February 14, 2014 ^ Are you using mobile version? On desktop version the orange Login button at top works, although I can see that Safari on iOS 6.1.3 renders poorly and the fields to enter credentials are hidden Also a bug, not sure if registered already: Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
MetalRacer Posted February 14, 2014 Share Posted February 14, 2014 My sub isn't getting any points or ranking? Also this is my best sub to date. http://hwbot.org/submission/2493801_ Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Join the conversation
You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.