Bobnova Posted January 16, 2013 Share Posted January 16, 2013 It lists it as 27.81 or 27.79. Only zeros are knocked off, as the trailing zero after a decimal point doesn't mean anything. Here's a 10.31: http://hwbot.org/submission/2320196_aristidis_pifast_core_i7_3770k_10.31_sec And a 10.39: http://hwbot.org/submission/2329516_wizerty_pifast_core_i7_3770k_10.39_sec Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
mr.paco Posted January 16, 2013 Share Posted January 16, 2013 (edited) It lists it as 27.81 or 27.79.Only zeros are knocked off, as the trailing zero after a decimal point doesn't mean anything. Thank you for clearing that up Bobnova. I never knew that or realized it. So that means: My apologies Schmuckley for reporting your submission in error. My mistake. Still there was no reason for you to take it to the level you did. That simple little matter could have been quickly squashed and cleared up if you would have responded to my PM or comment I made in the sub. Instead of holding a grudg against me for over 9 months over something so trivial. It is what it is. Sharing forum accounts is rarely accepted on forums I've been part of, but I have no idea what HWBots rules are on that, or whether they're in a forum thread or a rules page or which one to believe on a given day. He only said that, he has never logged in with my log-in account. Again; thank you Bobnova Edited January 16, 2013 by mr.paco Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Bobnova Posted January 16, 2013 Share Posted January 16, 2013 Glad I could help solve something Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Schmuckley Posted January 18, 2013 Share Posted January 18, 2013 Well..I must apologize for thinking you were a total douche for 9 mos Mr.Paco. Why haven't you re-subbed that score? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Mr.Scott Posted January 18, 2013 Share Posted January 18, 2013 (edited) Glad to see your opinion of me hasn't changed. I don't care either way. Soon I'll be able to sit at Massman's table, loved by thousands, hated by millions. Edited January 18, 2013 by Mr.Scott Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
GENiEBEN Posted January 18, 2013 Share Posted January 18, 2013 Soon I'll be able to sit at Massman's table, loved by thousands, hated by millions. Welcome to 'Interwebz' ... You're either in my corner, or you're with the trolls. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Mr.Scott Posted January 18, 2013 Share Posted January 18, 2013 Welcome to 'Interwebz' ... You're either in my corner, or you're with the trolls. I get that, thanks. :celebration: Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
just_nuke_em Posted January 18, 2013 Share Posted January 18, 2013 Glad to see your opinion of me hasn't changed. I don't care either way. Soon I'll be able to sit at Massman's table, loved by thousands, hated by millions. Schmuckles is just mad that he can't beat you and Paco in most of his benching . Don't read too much into it... Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Mr.Scott Posted January 18, 2013 Share Posted January 18, 2013 Schmuckles is just mad that he can't beat you and Paco in most of his benching . Don't read too much into it... Not losing sleep over it. Thanks bro. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Schmuckley Posted January 18, 2013 Share Posted January 18, 2013 (edited) Glad to see your opinion of me hasn't changed. I don't care either way. Soon I'll be able to sit at Massman's table, loved by thousands, hated by millions. ..and still be a douche Edited January 18, 2013 by Schmuckley Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
xxbassplayerxx Posted January 18, 2013 Share Posted January 18, 2013 Oh lawd. Why is Result.txt necessary when there's a 3DMark link anyway? I could see it being necessary if there wasn't... but IIRC, there was on Schmuckley's submission. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Bobnova Posted January 18, 2013 Share Posted January 18, 2013 I seriously doubt it, as it was a pifast submission of schmuckley's that got reported Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Mr.Scott Posted January 18, 2013 Share Posted January 18, 2013 (edited) That was the one Paco reported 9 months ago. What sparked the rage was roughly all of his PCM05 runs since 1/1 were reported by yours truly. I can assure you it wasn't personal............but I'm a douche, remember? Techjesse's issue with me was for the same reason. Doesn't really matter. Don't want the possibility of being reported?, check your subs before somebody else does. Edited January 18, 2013 by Mr.Scott Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
mr.paco Posted January 18, 2013 Share Posted January 18, 2013 Why haven't you re-subbed that score? running s940's right now. But, I'll be back Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Bobnova Posted January 19, 2013 Share Posted January 19, 2013 That was the one Paco reported 9 months ago. What sparked the rage was roughly all of his PCM05 runs since 1/1 were reported by yours truly. I can assure you it wasn't personal............but I'm a douche, remember?Techjesse's issue with me was for the same reason. Doesn't really matter. Don't want the possibility of being reported?, check your subs before somebody else does. Rules are rules. I can't say seeing half a dozen PC05 report emails streaming into my email inbox made me happy persay, but odds are excellent someone would have reported them eventually so whatever. I don't harbor a grudge against anybody who reports my stuff, regardless of whether I rage at the time. I do of course generally go check their results over! It's the "he who is without sin" thing, essentially. Sweet said he approved everything PC05 results.txt wise from 1/1 through 1/somethingRecent, if he actually did I think you did us a favor really The ideal thing of course is to nail the rules, then if your result gets reported it won't matter in the slightest. Valid results DO get reported, I've had some of mine reported as well as some of the overclockers.com team results. They sit around reported for a day to two months till a moderator looks at 'em and says "wtf is this reported for?" and marks them checked. Really not a big deal IMO. Results that come up short of the rules are a risk, sometimes there's a decent bet that they won't be reported (0.1boint results, for instance), but if they aren't within the rules they aren't within the rules. On that note, I'm curious to see what happens with the huge, but lacking GPUz, Heaven result. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
xxbassplayerxx Posted January 19, 2013 Share Posted January 19, 2013 Is there anything contained in the Results.txt file that doesn't show up on a 3DMark validation? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Bobnova Posted January 19, 2013 Share Posted January 19, 2013 It was said in a different thread by some mod or another that the PC05 section of 3dmark may go the way of the 3d03 section, leaving us to wonder if results were any good. I'm not entirely certain I buy that as an explanation, but there you have it. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Mr.Scott Posted January 19, 2013 Share Posted January 19, 2013 Rules are rules. I can't say seeing half a dozen PC05 report emails streaming into my email inbox made me happy persay, but odds are excellent someone would have reported them eventually so whatever. I don't harbor a grudge against anybody who reports my stuff, regardless of whether I rage at the time. I do of course generally go check their results over! It's the "he who is without sin" thing, essentially.Sweet said he approved everything PC05 results.txt wise from 1/1 through 1/somethingRecent, if he actually did I think you did us a favor really The ideal thing of course is to nail the rules, then if your result gets reported it won't matter in the slightest. Valid results DO get reported, I've had some of mine reported as well as some of the overclockers.com team results. They sit around reported for a day to two months till a moderator looks at 'em and says "wtf is this reported for?" and marks them checked. Really not a big deal IMO. Results that come up short of the rules are a risk, sometimes there's a decent bet that they won't be reported (0.1boint results, for instance), but if they aren't within the rules they aren't within the rules. On that note, I'm curious to see what happens with the huge, but lacking GPUz, Heaven result. We are similar in our reasoning. Thanks for the support Bob. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Bobnova Posted January 19, 2013 Share Posted January 19, 2013 Rules are rules When they're rules anyway. Hey Schmuckley, if you're still reading this thread you might want to go fix your PC05 results. You can't cover up the "system details" of the main benchmark window. Reference the sample SS: http://hwbot.org/blog/wp-content/pcmarkexample.jpg Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Schmuckley Posted January 25, 2013 Share Posted January 25, 2013 Oh! Look at what we have here! http://www.hwbot.org/submission/2309672_mr.scott_pcmark_2005_phenom_ii_x4_965_be_17571_marks No results.txt...no details tab, either. Maybe you should police your own work,Mr. Scott. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Crew Turrican Posted January 25, 2013 Crew Share Posted January 25, 2013 dude, that's an old score. results.txt wasn't required back then. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
xxbassplayerxx Posted January 25, 2013 Share Posted January 25, 2013 What about details? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Schmuckley Posted January 25, 2013 Share Posted January 25, 2013 eh..Just pointing out the hypocrisy. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Crew Turrican Posted January 25, 2013 Crew Share Posted January 25, 2013 What about details? there's a fm-link with all details. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Bobnova Posted January 25, 2013 Share Posted January 25, 2013 We were told earlier that a FM link won't cover for results.txt That said, at the time that was submitted it was perfectly legal, so it stands now too. Otherwise most of the database would have to be deleted! Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts