K404 Posted April 21, 2013 Share Posted April 21, 2013 (edited) I'm gonna be a dick and complain about a feature! When I click "open CPU-Z...." I get 4 instances and then, when I either open OR MAXIMISE GPU-Z, I get a 5th instance of CPU-Z....whilst pushing GPU-Z 80% off-screen (right hand side) We need two CPU-Z instances for verification..... please can that be the number that are opened? Also, if we click "run again" .....can there be a script to automatically close CPU-Z and GPU-Z? (ok...this is probably not needed once the instance count is sorted, we can close three windows ) Thanks Edited April 21, 2013 by K404 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
GENiEBEN Posted April 21, 2013 Share Posted April 21, 2013 I'm gonna be a dick and complain about a feature! When I click "open CPU-Z...." I get 4 instances and then, when I either open OR MAXIMISE GPU-Z, I get a 5th instance of CPU-Z....whilst pushing GPU-Z 80% off-screen (right hand side) We need two CPU-Z instances for verification..... please can that be the number that are opened? Also, if we click "run again" .....can there be a script to automatically close CPU-Z and GPU-Z? (ok...this is probably not needed once the instance count is sorted, we can close three windows ) Thanks Actually that's exactly how it's 'supposed' to work, but it's buggy with skinned cpuz/gpuz. Don't use the skinned versions and all would be good Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
K404 Posted April 22, 2013 Share Posted April 22, 2013 I've never used a skinned version Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
TASOS Posted April 22, 2013 Share Posted April 22, 2013 I'm gonna be a dick and complain about a feature! When I click "open CPU-Z...." I get 4 instances and then, when I either open OR MAXIMISE GPU-Z, I get a 5th instance of CPU-Z....whilst pushing GPU-Z 80% off-screen (right hand side) We need two CPU-Z instances for verification..... please can that be the number that are opened? Also, if we click "run again" .....can there be a script to automatically close CPU-Z and GPU-Z? (ok...this is probably not needed once the instance count is sorted, we can close three windows ) Thanks I have the same problem , and i also dont use a skinned version. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
GENiEBEN Posted April 22, 2013 Share Posted April 22, 2013 Ok, will rewrite that code this weekend. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
K404 Posted April 22, 2013 Share Posted April 22, 2013 Thankyou Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
mr.paco Posted May 12, 2013 Share Posted May 12, 2013 Hi GENiEBEN, First want to say Thank you for all the work you have been n still are putting into the app. Some help with an issue please. I am not an avid 3D bencher but I know there is something wrong here. This first run was with Aqua3 with wrapper version 1 This second run was done with I think is the latest version 2.25 As you notice the dramatic difference in scores. All HW n settings remained the same for both runs. Is there something that I must do with the newer version? Thank you... Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Crew Strunkenbold Posted May 18, 2013 Crew Share Posted May 18, 2013 Try to run on all cores. AM3 shows huge bumps in performance running with at least 2 cores. Im missing some kind of checkbox window, where I can select on which cores I want to run the bench. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Crew Leeghoofd Posted May 19, 2013 Crew Share Posted May 19, 2013 Having the same issue on my laptop, missing out on 45K in AM3 196K iso 240 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Moose83 Posted May 19, 2013 Share Posted May 19, 2013 I have V2.22 and V2.25 here, V2.22 is a lot faster;) Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
richba5tard Posted May 31, 2013 Share Posted May 31, 2013 v2.25: it always says the xml file is utf-8 (xml starts with <?xml version="1.0" encoding="utf-8"?>), but when the HWBOT engine parses this file it sometimes fails because there are non utf8 characters. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
GENiEBEN Posted May 31, 2013 Share Posted May 31, 2013 Should I go for UTF-16? Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
richba5tard Posted May 31, 2013 Share Posted May 31, 2013 No, the character set itself is not the issue, the issue is that the file is not in the character set it claims to be. It seems like the file is always written in the character set of the OS, but the wrapper says it is utf8. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
GENiEBEN Posted May 31, 2013 Share Posted May 31, 2013 It seems like the file is always written in the character set of the OS, but the wrapper says it is utf8. You are right, just looked over the code. If I ignore the charset in xml altogether would your parser handle the file? Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Crew Strunkenbold Posted May 31, 2013 Crew Share Posted May 31, 2013 Im missing some kind of checkbox window, where I can select on which cores I want to run the bench. Back in the days without any wrapper we used prioaff.exe tool to manually assign on which cores AQ3 should run. Genie, would that be hard to implement? There are some OS's outthere where you need to run the bench on atleast 2 cores before full performance is achieved. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
GENiEBEN Posted June 1, 2013 Share Posted June 1, 2013 Yeah it's a feature requested by everyone, will be in next version Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Crew Strunkenbold Posted June 1, 2013 Crew Share Posted June 1, 2013 That's great, thx! Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Aleslammer Posted July 1, 2013 Share Posted July 1, 2013 Get a 0 score using the wrapper with a Matrox G550 & Parhelia 256, (XP-32) both have no problem using the exe. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
GENiEBEN Posted July 1, 2013 Share Posted July 1, 2013 Get a 0 score using the wrapper with a Matrox G550 & Parhelia 256, (XP-32) both have no problem using the exe. Yeah there seems to be a problem with most IGP, but it is now fixed in 2.26 (to be launched soon). Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
chispy Posted July 20, 2013 Share Posted July 20, 2013 AM3 gives bugged high scores ? Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
chispy Posted July 21, 2013 Share Posted July 21, 2013 I can hear only crickets in here. Whats up with the support lately ? I have sent emails to Genieben a while ago and also ask questions about this bugged high scores and everyone just keep quiet ????? I need an answer please help on this matter. Genieben you got PM. Thank you in advanced. Regards: Chispy Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Massman Posted July 22, 2013 Author Share Posted July 22, 2013 I don't see a reason why Genieben's wrapper would give bugged scores. Mostly, when users report a bugged scores it's a matter of finding a couple settings that is making the result lower than expected. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
GENiEBEN Posted July 22, 2013 Share Posted July 22, 2013 I can hear only crickets in here. Whats up with the support lately ? I have sent emails to Genieben a while ago and also ask questions about this bugged high scores and everyone just keep quiet ????? I need an answer please help on this matter. Genieben you got PM. Thank you in advanced. Regards: Chispy AFK in vacation, seen your PM Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
chispy Posted July 26, 2013 Share Posted July 26, 2013 Thank you Genieben for the PM and welcome back from vacations :celebration: Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Moose83 Posted September 7, 2013 Share Posted September 7, 2013 I have an Aquamark 2.26 score to upload. Checking Wrapper File is ok, but when i submit finally, i get an error Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Join the conversation
You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.